Relapsed/refractory (R/R) indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) is generally considered incurable with current treatment options. Previous phase 1b/2 results showed combining magrolimab (anti–cluster-of-differentiation [CD] 47 antibody) with the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (M+R) has antitumor activity against R/R iNHL. We report 3-year follow-up data from this phase 1b/2 study assessing long-term safety and efficacy of M+R in R/R iNHL. After magrolimab priming, 4 patient groups in phase 1b M+R received 10 to 45-mg/kg magrolimab doses with 375 mg/m2 rituximab. Phase 2 explored 30 and 45 mg/kg magrolimab. Primary end points were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Exploratory analysis included circulating tumor DNA, biomarkers of magrolimab tumor penetration, and drug target expression assessments. Of 46 patients treated in phase 1b/2, 42 had follicular lymphoma and 4 had marginal zone lymphoma. All patients experienced ≥1 any-grade TEAE, and 44 reported ≥1 treatment-related TEAE. No additional toxicities were reported during long-term follow-up, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Median follow-up was 36.7 (range, 1.2-62.3) months. The ORR was 52.2%, with 30.4% achieving a complete response. The median DOR was 15.9 months, and median time-to-response was 1.8 months. Median PFS and OS were 7.4 (95% confidence interval, 4.8-13.0) months and not reached, respectively. These results demonstrate the long-term safety and efficacy of M+R in patients with iNHL and support further exploration of CD47-based treatment combinations. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02953509.

There is a paucity of data on the role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL). Using the CIBMTR registry, we report here the outcomes of AITL patients undergoing an allo-HCT. We evaluated 249 adult AITL patients who received their first allo-HCT during 2000–2016. The median patient age was 56 years (range = 21–77). Majority of the patients were Caucasians (86%), with a male predominance (60%). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was predominantly calcineurin inhibitor-based approaches while the most common graft source was peripheral blood (97%). Median follow-up of survivors was 49 months (range = 4–170 months). The cumulative incidence of grade 2–4 and grade 3–4 acute GVHD at day 180 were 36% (95% CI = 30–42) and 12 (95% CI = 8–17), respectively. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year was 49% (95%CI 43–56). The 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 19% (95% CI = 14–24), while the 4-year relapse/progression, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 21% (95% CI = 16–27), 49% (95% CI = 42–56), and 56% (95% CI = 49–63), respectively. On multivariate analysis, chemoresistant status at the time of allo-HCT was associated with a significantly higher risk for therapy failure (inverse of PFS) (RR = 1.73 95% CI = 1.08–2.77), while KPS < 90% was associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality (inverse of OS) (RR = 3.46 95% CI = 1.75–6.87). Our analysis shows that allo-HCT provides durable disease control even in AITL patients who failed a prior auto-HCT and in those subjects with refractory disease at the time of allografting.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies are transforming the treatment of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders and multiple myeloma, yet global access challenges and barriers for their implementation persist. Global access disparities persist, particularly for persons living in low and middle-income countries and for underserved populations in high income countries. In this review we address patient-related factors including age, comorbidities, fitness, race and ethnicity, and geographic location for CAR-T access. Also, we review disease-related and health system barriers like disease biology, potential for short and long-term toxicity, insurance access, referrals, supply and manufacturing, regulation, costs and treatment center capacity. Lastly, alternatives for overcoming these barriers exemplified by research efforts worldwide are discussed, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach from all stakeholders to improve global accessibility and ensure equitable access and improved outcomes for patients worldwide.

In patients with relapsed DLBCL in complete remission (CR), autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) and CAR-T therapy are both effective, but it is unknown which modality provides superior outcomes. We compared the efficacy of auto-HCT vs. CAR-T in patients with DLBCL in a CR. A retrospective observational study comparing auto-HCT (2015–2021) vs. CAR-T (2018–2021) using the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research registry. Median follow-up was 49.7 months for the auto-HCT and 24.7 months for the CAR-T cohort. Patients ages 18 and 75 with a diagnosis of DLBCL were included if they received auto-HCT (n = 281) or commercial CAR-T (n = 79) while in a CR. Patients undergoing auto-HCT with only one prior therapy line and CAR-T patients with a previous history of auto-HCT treatment were excluded. Endpoints included Progression-free survival (PFS), relapse rate, non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS). In univariate analysis, treatment with auto-HCT was associated with a higher rate of 2-year PFS (66.2% vs. 47.8%; p < 0.001), a lower 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (27.8% vs. 48% ; p < 0.001), and a superior 2-year OS (78.9% vs. 65.6%; p = 0.037). In patients with early (within 12 months) treatment failure, auto-HCT was associated with a superior 2-year PFS (70.9% vs. 48.3% ; p < 0.001), lower 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (22.8% vs. 45.9% ; p < 0.001) and trend for higher 2-year OS (82.4% vs. 66.1% ; p = 0.076). In the multivariable analysis, treatment with auto-HCT was associated with a superior PFS (hazard ratio 1.83; p = 0.0011) and lower incidence of relapse (hazard ratio 2.18; p < 0.0001) compared to CAR-T. In patients with relapsed LBCL who achieve a CR, treatment with auto-HCT is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared to CAR-T. These data support the consideration of auto-HCT in select patients with LBCL achieving a CR in the relapsed setting.

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) ineligible for available salvage therapies have limited options for long-term disease control, necessitating novel treatments. Previously, magrolimab (anti–cluster-of-differentiation-47 antibody) plus rituximab (M+R) demonstrated ability to induce complete responses (CR) in R/R DLBCL. Here, we report 3-year follow-up data from this phase 1b/2 study assessing long-term safety and efficacy of M+R, and initial safety and efficacy of M+R plus gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (M+R-GemOx), in R/R DLBCL. After magrolimab priming, 4 groups of patients received M+R, 10 to 45 mg/kg magrolimab with 375 mg/m2 rituximab; patients receiving M+R-GemOx received 30 or 45 mg/kg magrolimab with 375 mg/m2 rituximab, 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine, and 100 mg/m2 oxaliplatin. Primary end points were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Of 132 patients treated, 99 received M+R and 33 received M+R-GemOx. Most common any-grade TEAEs were fatigue (M+R, 40%; M+R-GemOx, 70%), infusion-related reactions (M+R, 39%), or anemia (M+R-GemOx, 70%). Treatment-related TEAEs led to magrolimab discontinuation in 7% (M+R) and 6% (M+R-GemOx). One death was considered treatment related (M+R-GemOx, colitis). M+R ORR was 24% (CR, 12%), and median DOR was 9.3 months. Median PFS and OS were 1.8 and 9.2 months, respectively. M+R-GemOx ORR was 52% (CR, 39%); 12-month DOR rate was 66.6% (95% confidence interval, 33.1-86.1). Median PFS and OS were 3.9 months and not reached, respectively. These results demonstrate that M+R with/without GemOx is well tolerated, and M+R-GemOx has clinical activity in patients with R/R DLBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02953509.