Diabetic retinopathy (DR), a common ocular microvascular complication of diabetes, contributes significantly to diabetes-related vision loss. This study addresses the imperative need for early diagnosis of DR and precise treatment strategies based on the explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework. The study integrated clinical, biochemical, and metabolomic biomarkers associated with the following classes: non-DR (NDR), non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. To create machine learning (ML) models, 10% of the data was divided into validation sets and 90% into discovery sets. The validation dataset was used for hyperparameter optimization and feature selection stages, while the discovery dataset was used to measure the performance of the models. A 10-fold cross-validation technique was used to evaluate the performance of ML models. Biomarker discovery was performed using minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR), Boruta, and explainable boosting machine (EBM). The predictive proposed framework compares the results of eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), natural gradient boosting for probabilistic prediction (NGBoost), and EBM models in determining the DR subclass. The hyperparameters of the models were optimized using Bayesian optimization. Combining EBM feature selection with XGBoost, the optimal model achieved (91.25 ± 1.88) % accuracy, (89.33 ± 1.80) % precision, (91.24 ± 1.67) % recall, (89.37 ± 1.52) % F1-Score, and (97.00 ± 0.25) % the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). According to the EBM explanation, the six most important biomarkers in determining the course of DR were tryptophan (Trp), phosphatidylcholine diacyl C42:2 (PC.aa.C42.2), butyrylcarnitine (C4), tyrosine (Tyr), hexadecanoyl carnitine (C16) and total dimethylarginine (DMA). The identified biomarkers may provide a better understanding of the progression of DR, paving the way for more precise and cost-effective diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Endometrial cancer, which is the most common gynaecological cancer in women after breast, colorectal and lung cancer, can be diagnosed at an early stage. The first aim of this study is to classify age, tumor grade, myometrial invasion and tumor size, which play an important role in the diagnosis and prognosis of endometrial cancer, with machine learning methods combined with explainable artificial intelligence. 20 endometrial cancer patients proteomic data obtained from tumor biopsies taken from different regions of EC tissue were used. The data obtained were then classified according to age, tumor size, tumor grade and myometrial invasion. Then, by using three different machine learning methods, explainable artificial intelligence was applied to the model that best classifies these groups and possible protein biomarkers that can be used in endometrial prognosis were evaluated. The optimal model for age classification was XGBoost with AUC (98.8%), for tumor grade classification was XGBoost with AUC (98.6%), for myometrial invasion classification was LightGBM with AUC (95.1%), and finally for tumor size classification was XGBoost with AUC (94.8%). By combining the optimal models and the SHAP approach, possible protein biomarkers and their expressions were obtained for classification. Finally, EWRS1 protein was found to be common in three groups (age, myometrial invasion, tumor size). This article’s findings indicate that models have been developed that can accurately classify factors including age, tumor grade, and myometrial invasion all of which are critical for determining the prognosis of endometrial cancer as well as potential protein biomarkers associated with these factors. Furthermore, we were able to provide an analysis of how the quantities of the proteins suggested as biomarkers varied throughout the classes by combining the SHAP values with these ideal models.

This study aims to develop an interpretable prediction model based on explainable artificial intelligence to predict bacterial sepsis and discover important biomarkers. A total of 1572 adult patients, 560 of whom were sepsis positive and 1012 of whom were negative, who were admitted to the emergency department with suspicion of sepsis, were examined. We investigated the performance characteristics of sepsis biomarkers alone and in combination for confirmed sepsis diagnosis using Sepsis-3 criteria. Three different tree-based algorithms—Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost)—were used for sepsis prediction, and after examining comprehensive performance metrics, descriptions of the optimal model were obtained with the SHAP method. The XGBoost model achieved accuracy of 0.898 (0.868–0.929) and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.940 (0.898–0.980) with a 95% confidence interval. The five biomarkers for predicting sepsis were age, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, procalcitonin, and positive blood culture. SHAP results revealed that older age, higher respiratory rate, procalcitonin, neutrophil–lymphocyte count ratio, C-reactive protein, plaque, leukocyte particle concentration, as well as lower oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, and hemoglobin levels increased the risk of sepsis. As a result, the Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)-based prediction model can guide clinicians in the early diagnosis and treatment of sepsis, providing more effective sepsis management and potentially reducing mortality rates and medical costs.

The aim of this study is to clarify the role of different Doppler parameters such as umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR), cerebroplacentouterine ratio (CPUR), aortic isthmus, renal artery, and umbilical vein flow Doppler in predicting adverse neonatal outcomes in fetuses with late -onset fetal growth restriction. The study included all patients diagnosed with fetal growth restriction at 32-39 weeks' gestation between 01/02/2020 and 01/02/2022 and treated at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inonu University School of Medicine. Patients included in the study had a median gestational week at delivery of 37 (minimum 33+0-maximum 39+0), median CPR of 1.42 (minimum-maximum 0.43-3.57), and median UCR of 0.7 (minimum-maximum 0.28-2.3). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the performance of the measured obstetric Doppler parameters in predicting the development of adverse neonatal outcomes. Umbilical venous blood flow showed the best performance in predicting adverse neonatal outcomes [area under the curve 0.952, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.902-0.981, p<0.001]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that fetuses with abnormal CPUR had a 4.5-fold (95% CI 0.084-0.583, p=0.02) increased risk of adverse neonatal outcome, whereas fetuses with abnormal umbilical venous flow had a 1.07-fold (95% CI 0.903-0.968, p<0.001) increased risk of adverse neonatal outcome. The results of this study demonstrate that the use of UCR, CPUR, umbilical venous flow, and aortic isthmus PI Doppler parameters along with umbilical artery PI and CPR are effective in predicting adverse neonatal outcomes in fetuses with late -onset fetal growth restriction.