Molecular therapy targeting tumor angiogenesis has been the standard treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, despite their significant antitumor effects, most of patients with mRCC have not been cured. Under such circumstances, anticancer immunotherapy has been considered a promising treatment modality for mRCC, and cancer-reactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are the most powerful effectors among several immune cells. However, anticancer CTLs can be inhibited by several immune inhibitory mechanisms, including the interaction between programmed death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1, on T cells and cancer cells, respectively. Alternatively, this also means that PD-L1 could be a promising target for anticancer immunotherapy. Therefore, we searched for PD-L1-derived peptides that are applicable for anticancer vaccine for HLA-A24⁺ RCC patients. Among 5 peptides derived from PD-L1, which were prepared based on the binding motif to the HLA-A24 allele, both PD-L1_11-19 and PD-L1_41-50 peptides induced peptide-specific CTLs from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of HLA-A24⁺ RCC patients. Such PD-L1 peptide-stimulated CD8⁺ T cells showed cytotoxicity against HLA-A24⁺ and PD-L1-expressing RCC cells. Although IFN-γ treatment increased PD-L1 expression on PD-L1^low RCC cells, their sensitivity to cytotoxicity of PD-L1 peptide-stimulated CD8⁺ T cells varied between patients. Altogether, these results indicate that both PD-L1_11-19 and PD-L1_41-50 peptides could be candidates for peptide-based anticancer vaccines for HLA-A24⁺ mRCC patients.

Castration-resistant prostate cancer is an incurable heterogeneous disease that is characterized by a complex multistep process involving different cellular and biochemical changes brought on by genetic and epigenetic alterations. These changes lead to the activation or overexpression of key survival pathways that also serve as potential therapeutic targets. Despite promising preclinical results, molecular targeted therapies aimed at such signaling pathways have so far been dismal. In the present study, we used a PTEN-deficient mouse model of prostate cancer to show that plasticity in castration-resistant tumors promotes therapeutic escape. Unlike castration-naïve tumors which depend on androgen receptor and PI3K/AKT signal activation for growth and survival, castration-resistant tumors undergo phenotypic plasticity leading to increased intratumoral heterogeneity. These tumors attain highly heterogeneous phenotypes that are characterized by cancer cells relying on alternate signal transduction pathways for growth and survival, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase and janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription, and losing their dependence on PI3K signaling. These features thus enabled castration-resistant tumors to become insensitive to the therapeutic effects of PI3K/AKT targeted therapy. Overall, our findings provide evidence that androgen deprivation drives phenotypic plasticity in prostate cancer cells and implicate it as a crucial contributor to therapeutic resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Therefore, incorporating intratumoral heterogeneity in a dynamic tumor model as a part of preclinical efficacy determination could improve prediction for response and provide better rationale for the development of more effective therapies.

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Targeted agents with a similar or different target molecule are often used sequentially in the treatment of metastatic RCC. Two tyrosine kinase inhibitors, sorafenib and sunitinib, have been reported to show little cross‐resistance, when used sequentially. In addition, a recent report showed that sunitinib rechallenge could potentially benefit selected patients. This case series shows that patients once refractory to sorafenib could regain disease control on rechallenge with sorafenib during sequential treatment. Outcomes of the sorafenib rechallenge were not significantly affected by the response to the initial sorafenib treatment or by the duration of intervening treatments between first sorafenib and rechallenge. OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinical outcomes of sorafenib rechallenge during sequential therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic RCC who received sorafenib rechallenge after failed treatment first with sorafenib and subsequently with other agents, were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics, best response, progression‐free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Of the 14 patients who received sorafenib rechallenge, 12 were evaluable for response. Eleven patients had previously undergone nephrectomy, and 10 had previously received systemic therapy, mostly interferon‐α (nine patients) and interleukin‐2 (six patients), with a median duration of 9 months. The best responses after the first sorafenib therapy were partial response (PR) in two patients, stable disease (SD) in seven, and progressive disease (PD) in two. The median PFS was 5.7 months. Initial sorafenib therapy was discontinued because of PD in eight patients and AEs in four patients. Rechallenge with sorafenib was undertaken after a 7.6 month median interval from the initial sorafenib challenge. Eight patients achieved SD on sorafenib rechallenge and median PFS was 5.4 (95% confidence interval, 3.8–7.0) months. The outcome of the sorafenib rechallenge was not significantly affected by the response to the initial sorafenib treatment or by the duration of treatments received between first sorafenib and rechallenge. No severe AE was newly observed on the rechallenge. CONCLUSION: In the systemic treatment of advanced RCC, it was suggested that patients once refractory to sorafenib could regain disease control on rechallenge with sorafenib during sequential treatment.

Despite recent advances in the treatment for advanced prostate cancer, outcomes remain poor. This lack of efficacy has prompted the development of alternative treatment strategies. In the present study we investigate the effects of the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib in a genetically engineered mouse model of prostate cancer and explore the rational combination with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus. Conditional prostate specific PTEN-deficient knockout mice were utilized to determine the pharmacodynamic and chemopreventive effects of sorafenib. This mouse model was also used to examine the therapeutic efficacy of sorafenib alone or in combination with everolimus. Preclinical efficacy was assessed by comparing the reduction of tumor burden, proliferation, angiogenesis and the induction of apoptosis. Molecular responses were assessed by immunohistochemical, TUNEL and western blot assays. Pharmacodynamic analysis revealed that a single dose of sorafenib decreased activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling axis at doses of 30–60 mg/kg, but activated JAK/STAT3 signaling. Levels of cleaved casapase-3 increased in a dose dependent manner. Chemoprevention studies showed that chronic sorafenib administration was capable of inhibiting tumor progression through the reduction of cancer cell proliferation, angiogenesis and the induction of apoptosis. In intervention models of established castration-naïve and castration-resistant prostate cancer, treatment with sorafenib provided modest but statistically insignificant reduction in tumor burden. However, sorafenib significantly inhibited cancer cell proliferation and MVD but had minimal effects on the induction of apoptosis. Interestingly, the administration of sorafenib increased the expression levels of the androgen receptor, p-GSK3β and p-ERK1/2 in castration-resistant prostate cancers. In both intervention models, combination therapy demonstrated a clear tendency of enhanced antitumor effects over monotherapy. Notably, the treatment combination of sorafenib and everolimus overcame therapeutic escape from single agent therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancers. In summary, we provide insights into the molecular responses of sorafenib therapy in a clinically relevant model of prostate cancer and present preclinical evidence for the development of targeted treatment strategies based on the use of multikinase inhibitors in combination with mTOR inhibitors for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.