Farmers are increasingly faced with challenges such as climate change, population growth, and the need for sustainable food production, while simultaneously having to address the environmental impacts of conventional agriculture. Agroecology has emerged as a holistic and sustainable approach to agriculture, integrating environmental, social, and economic principles. This study investigates the role of digital tools, including decision support systems (DSSs), in supporting agroecological transitions. Through a literature review and analysis of case studies, this paper examines the benefits and challenges associated with the adoption of digital tools in agroecology, highlighting their potential to promote sustainable practices such as soil and water management, pest control, and efficient resource use. The findings indicate that while digital solutions offer significant potential to enhance productivity and improve environmental outcomes, their adoption remains limited due to barriers such as low digital literacy, lack of infrastructure, and concerns about effectiveness in real-world farming conditions. Despite these challenges, digital solutions offer significant potential to enhance productivity, improve environmental outcomes, and support farmers’ decision-making. To comprehensively understand their benefits, a holistic approach is necessary, combining digital tools with hands-on training, policy support, and ongoing research. This paper highlights the role of digital tools in agroecology, explores their benefits and challenges, and discusses the need for continued research to assess their long-term potential in terms of the agroecological transition.

In recent years, land degradation has become a major challenge for human society, with negative impacts on the natural habitat, the economy, and human well-being. A variety of anthropogenic and natural factors are exacerbating the processes of land degradation in the era of climate change. Land restoration is an important and proactive strategy to combat this negative situation. Among the many approaches, the use of vegetation plays a central role in restoring soil health, preventing erosion, promoting biodiversity, and improving water retention. Therefore, the identification of new plant species that have the properties to contribute to land restoration is a necessity today. The plant proposed in this conceptual review for land restoration is the cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum L.). After a brief presentation of the agronomy, adaptability, and multiple uses of this plant species, its potential to provide important ecosystem services useful for land restoration to combat land degradation is herein emphasized. Recent studies have shown that this plant has great potential for phytoremediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals (Zn, Pb, Cr, Cd, Ni, Hg, and Co), especially in post-mining areas where pollution exceeds ecological limits. Most studies have shown that the accumulation of heavy metals is higher at the lamina stage. There is also some evidence that the cup plant thrives in flood-prone areas and contributes to their restoration. Cup plant cultivation can also reduce greenhouse gasses and increase the organic carbon content of the soil. Another method of land restoration related to the establishment of the cup plant in a given area is the suppression of weeds, particularly the prevention of the invasion of exotic weed species. Further research under different soil–climatic conditions is needed to investigate cup plant cultivation as a promising strategy for land restoration in a time when the climate is constantly changing.

Climate change has become one of the biggest challenges for farmers, advisors, researchers, and policymakers in recent years. Concerns about food security and the economic future have led these groups to search for methods to adapt to and mitigate climate change. In this context, cover crops have emerged as an important tool to improve soil health, prevent nitrate leaching, and increase crop productivity. The main objective of this review is to explore the multiple benefits of cover crops, including their role in improving soil health, sequestering CO₂, fixing N₂, and enhancing gas exchange, all of which contribute to the sustainability of agricultural systems under climate change conditions. One of the key findings of this research is that cover crop cultivation must be carefully tailored to the specific site, farm, intended purpose, and top priority, taking into account factors such as species selection, crop duration, and termination methods. Certain cover crop species have the potential to mitigate important climate change factors, such as soil erosion and nitrogen leaching, while increasing soil organic matter. However, many studies often focus on only one aspect of cover crops, overlooking the full range of ecosystem services they provide. In addition, future research must also address the economic challenges associated with cover crops.

Horseweed (C. canadensis) and fleabane (C. sumatrensis) are two annual or perennial herbaceous weeds present with high frequency and density in many parts of the world. Their response to water deficit was studied by means of seed germination tests and pot experiments. Seed germination was tested in solutions with different concentrations of polyethylene glycol (PEG). Two biotypes of each species were examined, one glyphosate resistant and the other susceptible. Growth responses were similar in the two species, both being more affected by lower (−1 MPa) than higher water potential (−0.2 MPa). The results revealed a significant effect of the biotype and the weed species on the drought stress response and adaptation. When high PEG concentrations were applied (−0.6 MPa), both C. sumatrensis biotypes had higher germination percentages (up to 88%) than the C. canadensis biotypes, while in most cases the seeds of the resistant biotypes germinated more (up to 72%) compared to the susceptible ones. These findings were confirmed by means of NDVI values, indicating that remote sensing can be used for a quick evaluation of the drought stress response of these weeds. The results obtained highlight the significant effect of species, biotypes and drought stress level on the germination, survival and growth of the weeds.

Thermal weed control can contribute to the development of sustainable integrated weed management systems. This study aimed to optimize hot foam use for thermal weed control in vineyards ( Vitis vinifera L.), spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.), and onions ( Allium cepa L.). In the vineyard, a randomized complete block design (RCBD) was established with four treatments repeated three times. The treatment list included three different hot foam application rates (13.33, 26.67, and 39.99 L m ⁻² ) and a control. The results showed that at the application rate of 39.99 L m ^–2 , the total weed density and biomass were reduced by 91 and 98%, respectively, compared to the control. This treatment was very effective on Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist. For both vegetables, four treatments were replicated three times (RCBD): untreated control (SSB-0) and stale seedbed with hot foam for thermal weed control before sowing but after 1 (SSB-1), 2 (SSB-2) and 3 weeks (SSB-3) of seedbed preparation. Compared to the control, SSB-3 reduced the biomass of Sinapis arvensis L., Papaver rhoeas L., and Lolium rigidum Gaud. in spinach by 85, 83, and 91%, respectively, and that of Amaranthus retroflexus L. in onions by 90%. In perennial crops, weed infestation appeared to decrease as the application rate of hot foam was increased. For open-field vegetables, the longer the period between seedbed preparation and pre-sowing thermal weed control, the greater the efficacy of hot foam in a stale seedbed. Further research is required to optimize hot foam as a thermal weed control tool in more cropping systems and environments.