Refractory angina is an independent predictor of adverse events in patients with vasospastic angina (VSA). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between coronary lumen complexity and refractory symptoms in patients with VSA. Seventeen patients with VSA underwent optical coherence tomography. The patients were divided into the refractory VSA group (n = 9) and the stable VSA group (n = 8). A shoreline development index was used to assess the coronary artery lumen complexity. Shear stress was estimated using a computational fluid dynamics model. No difference was observed in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The refractory VSA group showed the higher shoreline development index (refractory VSA 1.042 [1.017–1.188] vs stable VSA 1.003 [1.006–1.025], p = 0.036), and higher maximum medial thickness (refractory VSA 184 ± 17 μm vs stable VSA 148 ± 31 μm, p = 0.017), and higher maximum shear stress (refractory VSA 14.5 [12.1–18.8] Pa vs stable VSA 5.6 [3.0–10.5] Pa, p = 0.003). The shoreline development index positively correlates with shear stress (R² = 0.46, P = 0.004). Increased medial thickness of the coronary arteries provokes lumen complexity and high shear stress, which might cause refractory symptoms in patients with VSA. The shoreline index could serve as a marker for irritability of the medial layer of coronary arteries and symptoms.

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) progresses rapidly with a poor prognosis. Therefore, methods for early diagnosis that are easily accessible in any hospital, are required. We hypothesized that based on the pathology of CA, morphological left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) without electrical augmentation, namely paradoxical LVH, could be used to diagnose CA. This study aimed to investigate whether paradoxical LVH has diagnostic significance in identifying CA in patients with LVH. Patients who presented with left ventricular (LV) wall thickness ≥ 12 mm on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) were enrolled from a multicentre CMR registry. Paradoxical LVH was defined as a LV wall thickness ≥ 12 mm on CMR, SV1 + RV5 < 3.5 mV, and a lack of secondary ST-T abnormalities. The diagnostic significance of paradoxical LVH in identifying CA was assessed. Of the 110 patients enrolled, 30 (27 %) were diagnosed with CA and 80 (73 %) with a non-CA aetiology. The CA group demonstrated paradoxical LVH more frequently than the non-CA group (80 % vs. 16 %, P < 0.001). It was an independent predictor for detecting CA in patients with LVH (odds ratio: 33.44, 95 % confidence interval: 8.325–134.3, P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predict value, negative predict value and accuracy of paradoxical LVH for CA detection were 80 %, 84 %, 65 %, 92 % and 83 %, respectively. Paradoxical LVH can be used for identifying CA in patients with LVH. Our findings could contribute to the early diagnosis of CA, even in non-specialized hospitals.

Introduction: Insufficient nutrient intake is a strong independent predictor of mortality in elderly patients with heart failure. However, it is unclear to what extent energy intake affects their prognosis. This study investigated the association between patient outcomes and actual measured energy intake in elderly patients (≥65 years) with heart failure. Methods: This study enrolled 139 elderly patients who were hospitalized with worsening heart failure at Shingu Municipal Medical Center, Shingu, Japan, between May 2017 and April 2018. Energy intake was evaluated for three days (from three days prior to the day of discharge until the day of discharge). Based on basal energy expenditure calculated using the Harris–Benedict equation, the patients were classified into a low-energy group (n = 38) and a high-energy group (n = 101). We assessed the prognosis in terms of both all-cause mortality and readmission due to worsening heart failure as a primary outcome. Results: Compared to the patients in the high-energy group, the patients in the low-energy group were predominantly female, less frequently had smoking habits and ischemic heart diseases, and had a higher left ventricular ejection fraction. The low-energy group had higher mortality than the high-energy group (p = 0.028), although the two groups showed equivalent event rates of the primary outcome (p = 0.569). Conclusion: Calculations based on the Harris–Benedict equation revealed no significant difference in the primary outcome between the two groups, with a secondary outcome that showed worse mortality in the low-energy group. Given this result, energy requirement-based assessments using the Harris–Benedict equation might help in the management of elderly heart failure patients in terms of improved life outcomes.