Rutabaga [Brassica napus ssp. napobrassica (L.) Hanelt] is reported to be an excellent source of clubroot (Plasmodiophora brassicae) resistance genes. In this study, 124 rutabaga accessions from the Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and Iceland) were evaluated for their reaction to five single-spore isolates representing P. brassicae pathotypes 2F, 3H, 5I, 6M, and 8N and 12 field isolates representing pathotypes 2B, 3A, 3O, 5C, 5G, 5K, 5L, 5X (two isolates, L-G2 and L-G3), 8E, 8J, and 8P. The accessions were also genotyped using a 15K Brassica SNP array and 60 PCR-based primers linked to previously identified clubroot resistance genes. Six thousand eight hundred sixty-one SNP markers were retained after filtering with TASSEL 5.0, and used to evaluate four general linear models (GLM) and four mixed linear models (MLM). The PCA + K and Q + K MLM models gave the minimal deviance of the observed from the expected distribution in quantile-quantile plots, and hence were used for SNP-clubroot association analyses. In addition, 108 alleles derived from the PCR-based markers and the phenotypic data were analyzed with the PCA + K model. Forty-five SNPs and four PCR-based markers were identified to be associated strongly with resistance to isolates representing 13 pathotypes (2F, 3H, 5I, 6M, 8N, 2B, 3A, 3O, 5C, 5G, 5K, 5L, and 8P). These markers revealed the top and bottom segments of rutabaga chromosome A03 and the middle segment of chromosome A08 as genomic hotspots associated with resistance to the different P. brassicae pathotypes.

Background: Rutabaga or swede (Brassica napus ssp. napobrassica (L.) Hanelt) varies in root and leaf shape and colour, flesh colour, foliage growth habits, maturity date, seed quality parameters, disease resistance and other traits. Despite these morphological differences, no in-depth molecular analyses of genetic diversity have been conducted in this crop. Understanding this diversity is important for conservation and broadening the use of this resource. Results: This study investigated the genetic diversity within and among 124 rutabaga accessions from five Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Iceland) using a 15 K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) Brassica array. After excluding markers that did not amplify genomic DNA, monomorphic and low coverage site markers, the accessions were analyzedwith 6861 SNP markers. Allelic frequency statistics, including polymorphism information content (PIC), minor allele frequency (MAF) and mean expected heterozygosity ( $$ \overline{H} $$H ¯ e) and population differentiation statistics such as Wright’s F-statistics (F_ST) and analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) indicated that the rutabaga accessions from Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark were not genetically different from each other. In contrast, accessions from these countries were significantly different from the accessions from Iceland (P < 0.05). Bayesian analysis with the software STRUCTURE placed 66.9% of the rutabaga accessions into three to four clusters, while the remaining 33.1% constituted admixtures. Three multivariate analyses: principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) and neighbour-joining (NJ) clustering methods grouped the 124 accessions into four to six subgroups. Conclusion: Overall, the correlation of the accessions with their geographic origin was very low, except for the accessions from Iceland. Thus, Icelandic rutabaga accessions can offer valuable germplasm for crop improvement.

In this study, a rutabaga (Brassica napus ssp. napobrassica) donor parent FGRA106, which exhibited broad-spectrum resistance to 17 isolates representing 16 pathotypes of Plasmodiophora brassicae, was used in genetic crosses with the susceptible spring-type canola (B. napus ssp. napus) accession FG769. The F₂ plants derived from a clubroot-resistant F₁ plant were screened against three P. brassicae isolates representing pathotypes 3A, 3D, and 3H. Chi-square (χ²) goodness-of-fit tests indicated that the F₂ plants inherited two major clubroot resistance genes from the CR donor FGRA106. The total RNA from plants resistant (R) and susceptible (S) to each pathotype were pooled and subjected to bulked segregant RNA-sequencing (BSR-Seq). The analysis of gene expression profiles identified 431, 67, and 98 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the R and S bulks. The variant calling method indicated a total of 12 (7 major + 5 minor) QTLs across seven chromosomes. The seven major QTLs included: BnaA5P3A.CRX1.1, BnaC1P3H.CRX1.2, and BnaC7P3A.CRX1.1 on chromosomes A05, C01, and C07, respectively; and BnaA8P3D.CRX1.1, BnaA8P3D.RCr91.2/BnaA8P3H.RCr91.2, BnaA8P3H.Crr11.3/BnaA8P3D.Crr11.3, and BnaA8P3D.qBrCR381.4 on chromosome A08. A total of 16 of the DEGs were located in the major QTL regions, 13 of which were on chromosome C07. The molecular data suggested that clubroot resistance in FGRA106 may be controlled by major and minor genes on both the A and C genomes, which are deployed in different combinations to confer resistance to the different isolates. This study provides valuable germplasm for the breeding of clubroot-resistant B. napus cultivars in Western Canada.

Clubroot, caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae, is an important disease of canola (Brassica napus). Amisulbrom, a quinone inside inhibitor (QiI), was evaluated for its effectiveness in clubroot management in Alberta, Canada. Resting spores of P. brassicae were treated in vitro with 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10% (w/v) amisulbrom to determine its effect on spore germination and viability. Amisulbrom inhibited resting spore germination by up to 79% and reduced viable spores by 31% relative to the control. Applications of a liquid solution (AL1000, 1000 g active ingredient (ai) ha⁻¹) and granular formulations (AF700, 700 g ai ha⁻¹; AF1000, 1000 g ai ha⁻¹; AF1500, 1500 g ai ha⁻¹) of amisulbrom were tested on the canola cultivars ‘45H31’ (clubroot-susceptible) and ‘CS2000’ (moderately resistant) under greenhouse conditions and in field experiments in 2019 and 2020. In the greenhouse, the treatments were evaluated at inoculum concentrations of 1 × 10⁵ or 1 × 10⁷ resting spores g⁻¹ soil. A trend of decreasing clubroot severity with an increasing amisulbrom rate was observed. At the lower spore concentration, treatment with AF1500 resulted in a clubroot disease severity index (DSI) <20% for both cultivars, while the lowest DSI under both low and high spore concentrations was obtained with AL1000. The field results indicated a significant reduction in DSI, with varied effects of rates and liquid vs. granular formulations. The greatest reductions (up to 58.3%) in DSI were obtained with AF1500 and AL1000 in 2020. These findings suggest that amisulbrom holds promise as part of an integrated clubroot management approach.

Clubroot, a soilborne disease caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae, poses a significant threat to canola (Brassica napus) production. The use of lime to elevate soil pH shows promise for clubroot management. In this study, limestone and hydrated lime (HL) were evaluated for their effectiveness in controlling clubroot across four field sites in 2019 to 2020 and 2021 to 2022, and in greenhouse trials conducted in 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021. The treatments included an untreated control (UTC), limestone applied at rates of 5 and 10 t ha⁻¹ in either fall or spring, spring application of HL at 5.0 and 10 t ha⁻¹, and a combination of fall limestone application with spring HL application at rates of 2.5 or 5.0 t ha⁻¹ each. The canola hybrids ‘45H31’ (susceptible) and ‘CS2000’ (moderately resistant) were included in the greenhouse experiments, while ‘45H31’ was used in the field. Significant reductions (P < 0.05) in clubroot severity relative to the UTCs were observed in all lime treatments in the field or greenhouse, except for the 5.0 t ha⁻¹ spring limestone application at one field site in 2021 to 2022. Increases in soil pH and reductions in soil inoculum density were recorded for all lime treatments. The most consistent reductions in clubroot severity across sites and years were obtained with fall limestone or spring HL application at 10 t ha⁻¹, or the combination of fall limestone and spring HL at 5 t ha⁻¹ each. Applying limestone in the fall may present a viable option for managing clubroot in canola. [ ] Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .