Nursing research is rapidly increasing, yet contributions from numerous countries that may interest the international nursing community are impeded because many research articles are published in authors’ native language and not in English. The objectives of this work were to systematically review papers published in Italian related to job satisfaction and the quality of nursing care, and to discuss their findings in light of the international literature. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method was used. The Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and Indice della Letteretura Italiana di Scienze Infermieristiche (ILISI) databases were consulted for eligible studies published from January 2015 to November 2022. Two hundred sixteen papers were identified, 11 of which were selected for review: 8 on job satisfaction, two on workload issues, and 1 on quality of nursing care. The quality of included studies was assessed through the Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool (EPHPP). The results of our review were in line with those of international literature, and they can help to fill the knowledge gap on the quality of nursing performance in Italian care settings. In addition, the proposed method can provide further elements of discussion among literature providers and reviewers.

Purpose: The dermopigmentation of the Nipple-Areola Complex (NAC) is a safe non-surgical reconstruction technique that can restore psychophysical integrity, representing the final step after oncological surgery. This scoping review aims to identify and synthesize the literature focused on medical tattooing for NAC reconstruction in women who underwent breast reconstruction after cancer surgery. Competence and training, outcomes and organizational aspects were assessed as specific outcomes. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews was followed. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinical Key, Scopus and Cinahl databases were consulted. After title (N = 54) and abstract (N = 39) screening and full-text review (N = 18), articles that met eligibility criteria were analyzed, critically apprised and narratively synthesized. Results: 13 articles were analysed, with full texts (N = 11) and only abstract (N = 2). The overall quality of the literature (N observational studies = 11; N pilot experimental studies = 2) is weak. Nurses were the professionals mostly involved (N = 6), then medical staff (N = 4) and tattoo artists (N = 2). The professional training is poorly described in 6 papers. The most frequently assessed outcome was the satisfaction rate (N = 8). One study explored aspects of quality of life with a validated questionnaire. The management of these services resulted variable. Nurse-led services were implemented in 2 studies. Conclusion: Despite methodological weaknesses, NAC tattooing research is relevant because it helps women redefine their identity after demolitive cancer treatments. Further research on processes and outcomes is needed.

As the number of cancer survivors (CSs) is increasing worldwide, providing services relevant to the specific, unmet needs of these individuals is crucial. There are currently various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) whose aim is to identify the unmet needs of CSs. Still, limited guidance supports healthcare providers in choosing the most valid and reliable PROMs for this purpose. We conducted this overview of systematic reviews (SRs) on the psychometric properties of PROMs addressing the unmet needs of adult CSs suffering from non-cutaneous cancers. We searched databases for SRs published between 2012 and January 2023. Two SRs were included, covering 14 PROMs tested on 19,151 CSs. These were assessed according to the COSMIN methodology for SRs of PROMs for the quality of their measurement properties and risk of bias, thus providing guidance in selecting PROMs that appropriately reflect the unmet needs of CSs.

Background: The study’s aim is to identify the models of care used to provide survivorship care plans (SCPs) to cancer survivors in healthcare services, describing what kind of professionals are involved, in which settings and timings, and their feasibility. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews is followed. Studies that considered the SCPs applying different models of care, in any healthcare setting on any adult cancer survivors who completed oncological treatments, have been included. Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Cinahal were searched from 2013 to 2023 with these keywords: “Survivorship Care Plan”, “Oncology”, and “Program”. The study selection process was reported with the PRISMA-ScR. A total of 325 records were identified, 42 were screened, and, ultimately, 23 articles were included. Results: The models of care include: SCP standardization in hospitals; self-support oriented; consultation-based; primary or specialist direct referral; shared care; a multimodal approach. Multidisciplinary teams were involved in the SCP models of care. The settings were private clinics or cancer centers. One-hour SCP interventions were most frequently delivered through in-person visits, by telephone, or online. Conclusions: Implementing SCPs is feasible in healthcare contexts, but with challenges, like time and resource management. Patient-centered programs promoting coordinated care are promising models of care.

Aim: We aim to analyse the relationship between a nursing community‐based model of survivorship care, hypothesising its potential application in the Italian context. Design: Position paper. Methods: Discussion and agreement on evidence‐based and state‐of‐the‐art knowledge on survivorship care. Results: The integration of survivorship care in cancer prevention, treatment and rehabilitation pathways is essential to ensure tailored care for patients and their families. Programmes promoting coordinating care between hospitals and communities are promising models of care that may provide more graded assistance. Nurses are promising in this vision, favouring continuity, quality and appropriateness of survivorship care. Survivorship models in Italy are based on multidisciplinary rehabilitating programmes that are geared towards improving quality of life, reducing long‐term complications and preventing cancer relapses. A community nurse‐based model may guarantee equity in access to care by preventing disparities associated with fragilities. Also, it ensures care continuity by delivering services in community facilities. For citizens who are cancer survivors, the community nurse should also be the professional responsible for coordinating the survivorship care plan, promoting appropriateness and tailored care through advanced competence. Integrated into the oncological network, community nurses are capillary, context‐adaptive health ‘facilitators’ within society. Survivorship care models led by community nurses are promising in the Italian context. Organisational studies should be developed to test efficient models for delivering cancer survivorship care. Patient or Public Contribution: No patient or public contribution.

Purpose Selecting patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that accurately reflect the unmet needs of cancer survivors (CSs) remains a challenge in oncology, as current processes lack a structured methodology. This study aimed to develop and test the feasibility of a replicable, patient-centred framework for PROM selection, ensuring alignment between survivors' lived experiences and standardised outcome measures across diverse healthcare settings. Methods Our methodology integrated qualitative and quantitative approaches, mapping patient-expressed unmet needs onto the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). The process involved three steps: (1) identifying survivors’ needs through focus groups, interviews and questionnaires, (2) linking these needs to ICF categories using validated methodologies and (3) systematically evaluating existing PROMs based on their coverage of these categories. Application and results To demonstrate feasibility, we conducted a feasibility study involving 35 CSs and seven caregivers within the Italian healthcare context. Among the 14 PROMs analysed, the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES) covered 94.3% of ICF-linked needs, emerging as the most suitable option. The framework’s adaptability allows clinicians and researchers to identify context-specific PROMs for diverse populations and healthcare systems. Conclusions This study provides a robust, evidence-based methodology for optimising PROM selection, bridging the gap between patient narratives and standardised measurement. This feasibility study demonstrates the framework's practical applicability in clinical practice, with potential for broader implementation across diverse healthcare contexts. Its global applicability ensures that survivorship care remains patient-centred, data-driven and contextually relevant. Implications for Cancer Survivors By facilitating the selection of tailored PROMs, this framework enhances patient-centred survivorship care, ensuring that outcome assessments remain relevant to survivors’ experiences and improving care quality across different settings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06236373.