Objectives: To define the role of the intensivist in the initiation and management of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Design: Retrospective review of the literature and expert consensus. Setting: Series of in-person meetings, conference calls, and emails from January 2018 to March 2019. Subjects: A multidisciplinary, expert Task Force was appointed and assembled by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. Experts were identified by their respective societies based on reputation, experience, and contribution to the field. Interventions: A MEDLINE search was performed and all members of the Task Force reviewed relevant references, summarizing high-quality evidence when available. Consensus was obtained using a modified Delphi process, with agreement determined by voting using the RAND/UCLA scale, with score ranging from 1 to 9. Measurements and Main Results: The Task Force developed 18 strong and five weak recommendations in five topic areas of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation and management. These recommendations were organized into five areas related to the care of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: patient selection, management, mitigation of complications, coordination of multidisciplinary care, and communication with surrogate decision-makers. A common theme of the recommendations is extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is best performed by a multidisciplinary team, which intensivists are positioned to engage and lead. Conclusions: The role of the intensivist in the care of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation continues to evolve and grow, especially when knowledge and familiarity of the issues surrounding extracorporeal membrane oxygenation selection, cannulation, and management are applied.

The role of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy (V-V ECMO) in severe COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is still under debate and conclusive data from large cohorts are scarce. Furthermore, criteria for the selection of patients that benefit most from this highly invasive and resource-demanding therapy are yet to be defined. In this study, we assess survival in an international multicenter cohort of COVID-19 patients treated with V-V ECMO and evaluate the performance of several clinical scores to predict 30-day survival. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated retrospective non-interventional international multicenter registry study (NCT04405973, first registered 28 May 2020). In 127 patients treated with V-V ECMO at 15 centers in Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Belgium, and the United States, we calculated the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) Score, Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) Score, Predicting Death for Severe ARDS on V-V ECMO (PRESERVE) Score, and 30-day survival. Results: In our study cohort which enrolled 127 patients, overall 30-day survival was 54%. Median SOFA, SAPS II, APACHE II, RESP, and PRESERVE were 9, 36, 17, 1, and 4, respectively. The prognostic accuracy for all these scores (area under the receiver operating characteristic—AUROC) ranged between 0.548 and 0.605. Conclusions: The use of scores for the prediction of mortality cannot be recommended for treatment decisions in severe COVID-19 ARDS undergoing V-V ECMO; nevertheless, scoring results below or above a specific cut-off value may be considered as an additional tool in the evaluation of prognosis. Survival rates in this cohort of COVID-19 patients treated with V-V ECMO were slightly lower than those reported in non-COVID-19 ARDS patients treated with V-V ECMO.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a crucial life support therapy for patients with severe cardiac and respiratory failure. However, the complications associated with venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO), including thrombus formation, bleeding, and hemolysis, remain significant challenges that impact patient outcomes and healthcare costs. These complications primarily arise from blood–material interactions within the ECMO circuit, necessitating the development of biocompatible materials to optimize hemocompatibility. This review provides an updated overview of the latest advancements in VA-ECMO materials, focusing on cannula, oxygenators, and centrifugal pumps. Various surface modifications, such as heparin coatings, nitric oxide-releasing polymers, phosphorylcholine (PC)-based coatings, and emerging omniphobic surfaces, have been explored to mitigate thrombosis and bleeding risks. Additionally, novel oxygenator membrane technologies, including zwitterionic polymers and endothelial-mimicking coatings, offer promising strategies to enhance biocompatibility and reduce inflammatory responses. In centrifugal pumps, magnetic levitation systems and hybrid polymer-composite impellers have been introduced to minimize shear stress and thrombogenicity. Despite these advancements, no single material has fully addressed all complications, and further research is needed to refine surface engineering strategies. This review highlights the current progress in ECMO biomaterials and discusses future directions in developing more effective and durable solutions to improve patient safety and clinical outcomes.

COVID-19 can be associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome, which increases the likelihood of morbidity and mortality. Ventilator-induced lung injury is a known complication of mechanical ventilation (MV) and can further compound lung injury and recovery. Escalation to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be required in patients who deteriorate on MV. We report our experience with complete avoidance of MV using an ECMO First strategy deployed in an awake nonintubated COVID-19 patient with severe pneumonia.

Introduction: Sepsis remains a critical global health issue, causing multiple organ failure and high mortality rates, despite advances in antimicrobial therapies and supportive care. Extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) techniques have emerged as promising adjunctive strategies for the management of severe infections. The Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter (Seraph 100, ExThera Medical, Martinez, CA, USA) targets pathogens, while the Selective Cytopheretic Device (SCD, SeaStar Medical, Denver, CO, USA) neutralizes activated leukocytes. Although individually validated, evidence of the combined use of Seraph 100 and SCD remains scarce. Case Presentations: We present two cases that illustrate the combined use of Seraph 100 and SCD. The first case involves a 43-year-old woman with bacterial pneumonia, septic shock, and acute kidney injury (AKI). She underwent Seraph 100 hemoperfusion followed by SCD therapy, which improved her hemodynamics, oxygenation, and renal function, ultimately leading to full recovery. The second case involved a 31-year-old man with influenza, severe hypoxemia, and multi-organ failure. Despite advanced therapies, including veno-arterial venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Seraph 100, and SCD, his condition deteriorated, resulting in multi-organ failure and eventual death. Conclusion: These cases highlight the potential benefits and challenges of combining EBP, such as Seraph 100 and SCD. While successful in one case, the fatal outcome in the second underscores the importance of optimal patient selection, timing, and therapeutic strategies. Further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of combined EBP and to identify approaches for improving outcomes in critically ill patients.