Background: SARS‐CoV‐2 has triggered a pandemic and contributes to long‐lasting morbidity. Several studies have investigated immediate cellular and humoral immune responses during acute infection. However, little is known about long‐term effects of COVID‐19 on the immune system.Methods: We performed a longitudinal investigation of cellular and humoral immune parameters in 106 non‐vaccinated subjects ten weeks (10 w) and ten months (10 m) after their first SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Peripheral blood immune cells were analyzed by multiparametric flow cytometry, serum cytokines were examined by multiplex technology. Antibodies specific for the Spike protein (S), the receptor‐binding domain (RBD) and the nucleocapsid protein (NC) were determined. All parameters measured 10 w and 10 m after infection were compared with those of a matched, noninfected control group (n = 98).Results: Whole blood flow cytometric analyses revealed that 10 m after COVID‐19, convalescent patients compared to controls had reduced absolute granulocyte, monocyte, and lymphocyte counts, involving T, B, and NK cells, in particular CD3⁺CD45RA⁺CD62L⁺CD31⁺ recent thymic emigrant T cells and non‐class‐switched CD19⁺IgD⁺CD27⁺ memory B cells. Cellular changes were associated with a reversal from Th1‐ to Th2‐dominated serum cytokine patterns. Strong declines of NC‐ and S‐specific antibody levels were associated with younger age (by 10.3 years, p < .01) and fewer CD3⁻CD56⁺ NK and CD19⁺CD27⁺ B memory cells. Changes of T‐cell subsets at 10 m such as normalization of effector and Treg numbers, decline of RTE, and increase of central memory T cell numbers were independent of antibody decline pattern.Conclusions: COVID‐19 causes long‐term reduction of innate and adaptive immune cells which is associated with a Th2 serum cytokine profile. This may provide an immunological mechanism for long‐term sequelae after COVID‐19.

Hypersensitivity reactions are dysregulated and potentially devastating immune responses, characterized by a tendency to become chronic. They target either self-proteins or harmless foreign proteins and are driven by both T and B cells. Although numerous symptomatic treatment options for hypersensitivity reactions have been established over recent decades, only a few antigen-specific, causal approaches capable of specifically targeting the pathogenic autoreactive T and/or B cells have been developed. Among these are cell-based treatment modalities involving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)- or chimeric autoantibody-receptor (CAAR)-expressing cells. These therapies utilize B- or T-cell antigens, presented as B-cell epitopes or peptide-major histocompatibility complexes (pMHCs) to serve as bait. The latter are coupled to potent activation domains derived from the TCR/CD3 complex itself, such as the zeta or CD3 chains, as well as domains from bona fide co-stimulatory molecules (e.g., CD28, 4-1BB). Recent in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated the therapeutic potential of these ATMP-based strategies in eliminating autoreactive lymphocytes and alleviating hypersensitivity reactions. This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status of antigen-specific CAR and CAAR T-cell therapies, highlighting novel directions as well as the ongoing challenges within this promising research field.

Virus-like nanoparticles (VNP) are regarded as efficient vaccination platforms and have proven to be useful for the non-anaphylactogenic delivery of allergen-specific immunotherapy in preclinical models previously. Herein, we sought to determine the mode of VNP uptake by antigen presenting cells (APC). Accordingly, we screened a collection of substances known to inhibit different uptake pathways by APC. The human leukemia monocytic cell line THP-1 and the murine dendritic cell line DC 2.4 were examined for the uptake of fluorescently labelled VNP in the presence or absence of inhibitors. The inhibitory effect of candidate substances that blocked VNP uptake in APC lines was subsequently evaluated in studies with primary APC present in splenocyte and lung cell homogenates in vitro and upon intratracheal application of VNP in vivo. The uptake of allergen-specific VNP in vitro and in vivo was mainly observed by macrophages and CD103⁺ dendritic cells and was sensitive to inhibitors that block macropinocytosis, such as hyperosmolarity induced by sucrose or the polyphenol compound Rottlerin at low micromolar concentrations but not by other inhibitors. Also, T-cell proliferation induced by allergen-specific VNP was significantly reduced by both substances. In contrast, substances that stimulate macropinocytosis, such as Heparin and phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), increased VNP-uptake and may, thus, help modulate allergen-specific T-cell responses. We have identified macropinocytosis as the principal uptake mechanism of APC for allergen-specific VNP in vitro and in vivo, paving the way for further improvement of VNP-based therapies, especially those that can be used for tolerance induction in allergy, in the future.

Background: Prophylactic vaccination against infectious diseases may induce a state of long-term protection in the otherwise healthy host. However, the situation is less predictable in immunocompromised patients and may require adjustment of vaccination schedules and/or basic therapy. Methods: A patient in full remission of multiple myeloma since the last three years and on long-term maintenance therapy with pomalidomide, a drug inhibiting angiogenesis and myeloma cell growth, was vaccinated twice with Comirnaty followed by two vaccinations with Vaxzevria. Seroconversion and SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular responses were monitored. Results: No signs of seroconversion or T cellular memory were observed after the first “full immunization” with Comirnaty. Consequently, long-term-maintenance therapy with Pomalidomide was stopped and two additional shots of Vaxzevria were administered after which the patient seroconverted with Spike(S)-protein specific antibody levels reaching 49 BAU/mL, mild S-peptide pool-specific T cell proliferation, effector cytokine production (IL-2, IL-13), and T cellular activation with increased numbers of CD3⁺CD4⁺CD25⁺ T cells as compared to vaccinated and non-vaccinated control subjects. However, despite suspension of immunosuppression and administration of in total four consecutive heterologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccine shots, the patient did not develop neutralizing RBD-specific antibodies. Conclusions: Despite immunomonitoring-based adjustment of vaccination and/or therapy schedules vaccination success, with clear correlates of protection, the development of RBD-specific antibodies could not be achieved in the immunocompromised patient with current SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Thus, our report emphasizes the need for improved active and passive immunization strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Virus-like nanoparticles (VNPs) based on Moloney murine leukemia virus represent a well-established platform for the expression of heterologous molecules such as cytokines, cytokine receptors, peptide MHC (pMHC) and major allergens, but their application for inducing protective anti-viral immunity has remained understudied as of yet. Here, we variably fused the wildtype SARS-CoV-2 spike, its receptor-binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid (NC) to the minimal CD16b-GPI anchor acceptor sequence for expression on the surface of VNP. Moreover, a CD16b-GPI-anchored single-chain version of IL-12 was tested for its adjuvanticity. VNPs expressing RBD::CD16b-GPI alone or in combination with IL-12::CD16b-GPI were used to immunize BALB/c mice intramuscularly and subsequently to investigate virus-specific humoral and cellular immune responses. CD16b-GPI-anchored viral molecules and IL-12-GPI were well-expressed on HEK-293T-producer cells and purified VNPs. After the immunization of mice with VNPs, RBD-specific antibodies were only induced with RBD-expressing VNPs, but not with empty control VNPs or VNPs solely expressing IL-12. Mice immunized with RBD VNPs produced RBD-specific IgM, IgG_2a and IgG₁ after the first immunization, whereas RBD-specific IgA only appeared after a booster immunization. Protein/peptide microarray and ELISA analyses confirmed exclusive IgG reactivity with folded but not unfolded RBD and showed no specific IgG reactivity with linear RBD peptides. Notably, booster injections gradually increased long-term IgG antibody avidity as measured by ELISA. Interestingly, the final immunization with RBD–Omicron VNPs mainly enhanced preexisting RBD Wuhan Hu-1-specific antibodies. Furthermore, the induced antibodies significantly neutralized SARS-CoV-2 and specifically enhanced cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) against RBD protein-expressing target cells. In summary, VNPs expressing viral proteins, even in the absence of adjuvants, efficiently induce functional SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies of all three major classes, making this technology very interesting for future vaccine development and boosting strategies with low reactogenicity.

Background: COVID-19, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has now become endemic and is currently one of the important respiratory virus infections regularly affecting mankind. The assessment of immunity against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants is important for guiding active and passive immunization and SARS-CoV-2-specific treatment strategies. Methods: We here devised a novel flow cytometry-based diagnostic platform for the assessment of immunity against cell-bound virus antigens. This platform is based on a collection of HEK-293T cell lines which, as exemplified in our study, stably express the receptor-binding domains (RBDs) of the SARS-CoV-2 S-proteins of eight major SARS-CoV-2 variants, ranging from Wuhan-Hu-1 to Omicron. Results: RBD-expressing cell lines stably display comparable levels of RBD on the surface of HEK-293T cells, as shown with anti-FLAG-tag antibodies directed against a N-terminally introduced 3x-FLAG sequence while the functionality of RBD was proven by ACE2 binding. We exemplify the usefulness and specificity of the cell-based test by direct binding of IgG and IgA antibodies of SARS-CoV-2-exposed and/or vaccinated individuals in which the assay shows a wide linear performance range both at very low and very high serum antibody concentrations. In another application, i.e., antibody adsorption studies, the test proved to be a powerful tool for measuring the ratios of individual variant-specific antibodies. Conclusion: We have established a toolbox for measuring SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity against cell-bound virus antigens, which may be considered as an important addition to the armamentarium of SARS-CoV-2-specific diagnostic tests, allowing flexible and quick adaptation to new variants of concern.