A complete mode of action human relevance analysis—as distinct from mode of action (MOA) analysis alone—depends on robust information on the animal MOA, as well as systematic comparison of the animal data with corresponding information from humans. In November 2003, the International Life Sciences Institute's Risk Science Institute (ILSI RSI) published a 2-year study using animal and human MOA information to generate a four-part Human Relevance Framework (HRF) for systematic and transparent analysis of MOA data and information. Based mainly on non-DNA-reactive carcinogens, the HRF features a “concordance” analysis of MOA information from both animal and human sources, with a focus on determining the appropriate role for each MOA data set in human risk assessment. With MOA information increasingly available for risk assessment purposes, this article illustrates the further applicability of the HRF for reproductive, developmental, neurologic, and renal endpoints, as well as cancer. Based on qualitative and quantitative MOA considerations, the MOA/human relevance analysis also contributes to identifying data needs and issues essential for the dose-response and exposure assessment steps in the overall risk assessment.

A critical analysis of the literature base regarding the reproductive and developmental toxicity of arsenic compounds, with emphasis on inorganic arsenicals, was conducted. The analysis was stimulated by the great number of papers that have purported to have shown an association between exposure of pregnant laboratory animals to arsenic compounds and the occurrence of offspring with cranial neural tube defects, particularly exencephaly. For the most part, the literature reports of arsenic developmental toxicity in experimental animals are inadequate for human risk assessment purposes. Despite the shortcomings of the experimental database, several conclusions are readily apparent when the animal studies are viewed collectively. First, cranial neural tube defects are induced in rodents only when arsenic exposure has occurred early in gestation (on Days 7 [hamster, mouse], 8 [mouse], or 9 [rat]). Second, arsenic exposures that cause cranial neural tube defects are single doses that are so high as to be lethal (or nearly so) to the pregnant animal. Third, the effective routes of exposure are by injection directly into the venous system or the peritoneal cavity; even massive oral exposures do not cause increases in the incidence of total gross malformations. Fourth, repetition of similar study designs employing exaggerated parenteral doses is the source of the large number of papers reporting neural tube defects associated with prenatal arsenic exposure. Fifth, in five repeated dose studies carried out following EPA Guidelines for assessing developmental toxicity, arsenic was not teratogenic in rats (AsIII, 101 micromol/kg/d, oral gavage; 101 micromol/m3, inhalation), mice (AsV, 338 micromol/kg/d, oral gavage; est. 402 micromol/kg/d, diet), or rabbits (AsV, 21 micromol/kg/d, oral gavage). Data regarding arsenic exposure and adverse outcomes of pregnancy in humans are limited to several ecologic epidemiology studies of drinking water, airborne dusts, and smelter environs. These studies failed to (1) obtain accurate measurements of maternal exposure during the critical period of organogenesis and (2) control for recognized confounders. The lone study that examined maternal arsenic exposure during pregnancy and the presence of neural tube defects in progeny failed to confirm a relationship between the two. It is concluded that under environmentally relevant exposure scenarios (e.g., 100 ppm in soil), inorganic arsenic is unlikely to pose a risk to pregnant women and their offspring.

Glyphosate is the active ingredient of several widely used herbicide formulations. Glyphosate targets the shikimate metabolic pathway, which is found in plants but not in animals. Despite the relative safety of glyphosate, various adverse developmental and reproductive problems have been alleged as a result of exposure in humans and animals. To assess the developmental and reproductive safety of glyphosate, an analysis of the available literature was conducted. Epidemiological and animal reports, as well as studies on mechanisms of action related to possible developmental and reproductive effects of glyphosate, were reviewed. An evaluation of this database found no consistent effects of glyphosate exposure on reproductive health or the developing offspring. Furthermore, no plausible mechanisms of action for such effects were elucidated. Although toxicity was observed in studies that used glyphosate-based formulations, the data strongly suggest that such effects were due to surfactants present in the formulations and not the direct result of glyphosate exposure. To estimate potential human exposure concentrations to glyphosate as a result of working directly with the herbicide, available biomonitoring data were examined. These data demonstrated extremely low human exposures as a result of normal application practices. Furthermore, the estimated exposure concentrations in humans are >500-fold less than the oral reference dose for glyphosate of 2 mg/kg/d set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( U.S. EPA 1993 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1993. Re-registration eligibility decision (RED), Glyphosate. Report no. EPA-738-R-93-014, Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs and Toxic Substances. [Google Scholar] ). In conclusion, the available literature shows no solid evidence linking glyphosate exposure to adverse developmental or reproductive effects at environmentally realistic exposure concentrations.

Anatomical and developmental differences of the parental–offspring interface among experimental animals and humans throughout gestation are reviewed focusing on biodistribution of immunoglobulins (IgG). The formation of the extraembryonic membranes, uteroplacental circulation, and characteristics of the placenta (gross shape, modes of implantation, surface modifications that increase surface area, and extent of embryonic invasion into maternal tissue) are reviewed. Placental physiology and function are covered with attention to transfer of xenobiotics. Placental transfer of immunoglobulins in the human, non-human primate (NHP), rodent, and rabbit is discussed and the transfer of human fragment crystallizable (Fc)-containing biopharmaceuticals and potential impact on developmental toxicity risk assessment are specifically addressed. Safety assessment is often limited to the NHP as the only pharmacologically relevant model, despite poor statistical power as employed in current experimental designs. Although data are limited, the gestational timing of placental IgG transfer in rabbits appears to be more consistent with that of humans (i.e. occurring at the very end and after completion of organogenesis) than that of rodents, making the rabbit a reasonable choice assuming it is pharmacologically relevant. The rodent is not considered the most appropriate model for human placental transfer of Fc-containing biopharmaceuticals because it is currently believed to overestimate exposure during organogenesis. Nevertheless, the rodent may provide a conservative approach for hazard identification. It is clear that additional experimentation is needed to further clarify the timing of prenatal transfer of Fc-containing biopharmaceuticals in various species.