Eric J Hunter

Dr. Eric J Hunter

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 September 2008 in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLM.A. Little
M.A. Little
PMPatrick E. McSharry
Patrick E. McSharry
EHEric J Hunter
Eric J Hunter
JSJennifer Spielman
Jennifer Spielman
LRLorraine O. Ramig
Lorraine O. Ramig
In this paper, we present an assessment of the practical value of existing traditional and nonstandard measures for discriminating healthy people from people with Parkinson's disease (PD) by detecting dysphonia. We introduce a new measure of dysphonia, pitch period entropy (PPE), which is robust to many uncontrollable confounding effects including noisy acoustic environments and normal, healthy variations in voice frequency. We collected sustained phonations from 31 people, 23 with PD. We then selected ten highly uncorrelated measures, and an exhaustive search of all possible combinations of these measures finds four that in combination lead to overall correct classification performance of 91.4%, using a kernel support vector machine. In conclusion, we find that nonstandard methods in combination with traditional harmonics-to-noise ratios are best able to separate healthy from PD subjects. The selected nonstandard methods are robust to many uncontrollable variations in acoustic environment and individual subjects, and are thus well suited to telemonitoring applications.

19 February 2020 in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EHEric J Hunter
Eric J Hunter
LCLady Catherine Cantor Cutiva
Lady Catherine Cantor Cutiva
ELEva van Leer
Eva van Leer
MMMiriam van Mersbergen
Miriam van Mersbergen
CNChaya Devie Nanjundeswaran
Chaya Devie Nanjundeswaran
SWSusanna Whitling
Susanna Whitling
Purpose: The purpose of this document is threefold: (a) review the uses of the terms “vocal fatigue,” “vocal effort,” “vocal load,” and “vocal loading” (as found in the literature) in order to track the occurrence and the related evolution of research; (b) present a “linguistically modeled” definition of the same from the review of literature on the terms; and (c) propose conceptualized definitions of the concepts.Method: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scientific Electronic Library Online. Four terms (“vocal fatigue,” “vocal effort,” “vocal load,” and “vocal loading”), as well as possible variants, were included in the search, and their usages were compiled into conceptual definitions. Finally, a focus group of eight experts in the field (current authors) worked together to make conceptual connections and proposed consensus definitions.Results: The occurrence and frequency of “vocal load,” “vocal loading,” “vocal effort,” and “vocal fatigue” in the literature are presented, and summary definitions are developed. The results indicate that these terms appear to be often interchanged with blurred distinctions. Therefore, the focus group proposes the use of two new terms, “vocal demand” and “vocal demand response,” in place of the terms “vocal load” and “vocal loading.” We also propose standardized definitions for all four concepts.Conclusion: Through a comprehensive literature search, the terms “vocal fatigue,” “vocal effort,” “vocal load,” and “vocal loading” were explored, new terms were proposed, and standardized definitions were presented. Future work should refine these proposed definitions as research continues to address vocal health concerns.

1 May 2015 in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ITIngo R. Titze
Ingo R. Titze
RBRonald J. Baken
Ronald J. Baken
KBKenneth W. Bozeman
Kenneth W. Bozeman
SGSvante Granqvist
Svante Granqvist
NBNathalie Henrich Bernardoni
Nathalie Henrich Bernardoni
JWJoe Wolfe
Joe Wolfe

23 December 2010 in Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EHEric J Hunter
Eric J Hunter
KTKristine Tanner
Kristine Tanner
MSMarshall E. Smith
Marshall E. Smith
Studies suggest that occupational voice users have a greater incidence of vocal issues than the general population. Women have been found to experience vocal health problems more frequently than men, regardless of their occupation. Traditionally, it has been assumed that differences in the laryngeal system are the cause of this disproportion. Nevertheless, it is valuable to identify other potential gender distinctions which may make women more vulnerable to voice disorders. A search of the literature was conducted for gender-specific characteristics which might impact the vocal health of women. This search can be used by health care practitioners to help female patients avoid serious vocal health injuries, as well as to treat better those women who already suffer from such vocal health issues.

16 June 2014 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BMBrian B. Monson
Brian B. Monson
EHEric J Hunter
Eric J Hunter
ALAndrew J. Lotto
Andrew J. Lotto
BSBrad H. Story
Brad H. Story
While human vocalizations generate acoustical energy at frequencies up to (and beyond) 20 kHz, the energy at frequencies above about 5 kHz has traditionally been neglected in speech perception research. The intent of this paper is to review (1) the historical reasons for this research trend and (2) the work that continues to elucidate the perceptual significance of high-frequency energy (HFE) in speech and singing. The historical and physical factors reveal that, while HFE was believed to be unnecessary and/or impractical for applications of interest, it was never shown to be perceptually insignificant. Rather, the main causes for focus on low-frequency energy appear to be because the low-frequency portion of the speech spectrum was seen to be sufficient (from a perceptual standpoint), or the difficulty of HFE research was too great to be justifiable (from a technological standpoint). The advancement of technology continues to overcome concerns stemming from the latter reason. Likewise, advances in our understanding of the perceptual effects of HFE now cast doubt on the first cause. Emerging evidence indicates that HFE plays a more significant role than previously believed, and should thus be considered in speech and voice perception research, especially in research involving children and the hearing impaired.

1 June 2009 in Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EHEric J Hunter
Eric J Hunter
ITIngo R. Titze
Ingo R. Titze
Objectives: We quantified the recovery of voice following a 2-hour vocal loading exercise (oral reading). Methods: Eighty-six adult participants tracked their voice recovery using short vocal tasks and perceptual ratings after an initial vocal loading exercise and for the following 2 days. Results: Short-term recovery was apparent, with 90% recovery within 4 to 6 hours and full recovery at 12 to 18 hours. Recovery was shown to be similar to a dermal wound healing trajectory. Conclusions: The new recovery trajectory highlighted by the vocal loading exercise in the current study is called a vocal recovery trajectory. By comparing vocal fatigue to dermal wound healing, this trajectory is parallel to a chronic wound healing trajectory (as opposed to an acute wound healing trajectory). This parallel suggests that vocal fatigue from the daily use of the voice could be treated as a chronic wound, with the healing and repair mechanisms in a state of constant repair. In addition, there is likely a vocal fatigue threshold at which point the level of tissue damage would shift the chronic healing trajectory to an acute healing trajectory.