Marin Golčić

Dr. Marin Golčić

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 June 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marin GolčićMarin Golčić
Marin Golčić
LSLuka Simetić
Luka Simetić
DHDavorin Herceg
Davorin Herceg
KBKrešimir Blažičević
Krešimir Blažičević
GJGordana Kenđel Jovanović
Gordana Kenđel Jovanović
SPStjepko Plestina
Stjepko Plestina
Immunotherapy has improved the prognosis of metastatic melanoma patients, although most patients do not achieve a complete response. While specific gut microbiome and dietary habits might influence treatment success, there is a lack of concordance between the studies, potentially due to dichotomizing patients only into responders and non-responders. The aim of this study was to elucidate whether metastatic melanoma patients with complete and sustained response to immunotherapy exhibit differences in gut microbiome composition among themselves, and whether those differences were associated with specific dietary habits. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing revealed that patients who exhibited a complete response after more than 9 months of treatment (late responders) exhibited a significantly higher beta-diversity (p = 0.02), with a higher abundance of Coprococcus comes (LDA 3.548, p = 0.010), Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum (LDA 3.392, p = 0.024), and lower abundance of Prevotellaceae (p = 0.04) compared to early responders. Furthermore, late responders exhibited a different diet profile, with a significantly lower intake of proteins and sweets and a higher intake of flavones (p < 0.05). The research showed that metastatic melanoma patients with a complete and sustained response to immunotherapy were a heterogeneous group. Patients with a late complete response exhibited microbiome and dietary habits which were previously associated with an improved response to immunotherapy.

21 February 2018 in American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Marin GolčićMarin Golčić
Marin Golčić
RDRenata Dobrila Dintinjana
Renata Dobrila Dintinjana
GGGoran Golčić
Goran Golčić
IPIra Pavlović-Ružić
Ira Pavlović-Ružić
ASAleksandra Stevanović
Aleksandra Stevanović
LGLidija Gović-Golčić
Lidija Gović-Golčić
Quality of life is the cornerstone of palliative care, and assessing it requires validated and standardized questionnaires. However, the majority of questionnaires are not tested in a hospice setting. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of life in a hospice using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 for Palliative Care (PAL) (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) questionnaire and validating it in Croatian language. The study was conducted prospectively on 151 consecutive patients who were evaluated at the admittance to the hospice and after 7 days. Along with the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL, both evaluations included the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and the Palliative Performance Score (PPS) version 2. Cronbach α coefficient was used to test the reliability of multi-item scales, while construct and concurrent validity was tested using the Pearson correlation coefficients. Known-group validity was evaluated using the Student t test. Physical functioning, pain, and emotional functioning scales all exhibited high reliability on both assessments and met the criteria of Cronbach α ≥.70, while fatigue scale met the predetermined criteria in the follow-up assessment (α = .90). Adequate validity was also displayed, with the highest correlation coefficients between the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and ESAS scales recorded for the corresponding items. The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL was also able to distinguish patients with different PPS scores, exhibiting excellent clinical validity. The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL can be used successfully in Croatian palliative care. However, inevitable issues such as low retest percentage due to short survival and low physical functioning scores need to be acknowledged in further formulations of quality of life questionnaires specific to hospice care.

13 August 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marin GolčićMarin Golčić
Marin Golčić
Robin L. JonesRobin L. Jones
Robin L. Jones
PHPaul Huang
Paul Huang
ANAndrea Napolitano
Andrea Napolitano
Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgical treatment is recommended for the majority of localised GIST, while systemic treatment is the cornerstone of management for metastatic or unresectable disease. While a three-year regimen of imatinib is the standard of care in the adjuvant setting, there is no precise recommendation for the duration of neoadjuvant treatment, where imatinib is usually given between 4 and 12 months. Continuous treatment with imatinib at a dose of 400 mg once per day is recommended for most patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST in the first line. An exception is represented by patients with tumours harbouring the imatinib-insensitive PDGFRA D842V mutation who would be better treated with avapritinib. Targeted therapies are also recommended in the presence of NTRK rearrangements and BRAF mutations, although limited data are available. While an increase in the dose of imatinib to 800 mg is an option for the second line, sunitinib is usually considered the standard of care. Similar outcomes were reported for ripretinib in patients with tumours harbouring KIT exon 11 mutation, with significantly fewer side effects. Regorafenib and ripretinib are the standards of care in the third and fourth lines, respectively. The recent development of various systemic treatment options allows for a more personalised approach based on the molecular profile of the GIST, patient characteristics, and the profile of medications’ adverse events. A multidisciplinary approach is paramount since combining systemic treatment with locoregional treatment options and supportive care is vital for long-term survival.

1 January 2019 in Acta Clinica Croatica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AČAleksandar Čubranić
Aleksandar Čubranić
Marin GolčićMarin Golčić
Marin Golčić
DFDora Fučkar-Čupić
Dora Fučkar-Čupić
BBBoris Brozović
Boris Brozović
DGDomagoj Gajski
Domagoj Gajski
IBIvan Brumini
Ivan Brumini
Burkitt lymphoma, a type of non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma, is the fastest growing human cancer, presenting pathologically with a ‘starry sky’ pattern. It is most often found in the abdomen and the jaw, however, localization in the...

1 January 2018 in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Marin GolčićMarin Golčić
Marin Golčić
RDRenata Dobrila Dintinjana
Renata Dobrila Dintinjana
GGGoran Golčić
Goran Golčić
AČAleksandar Čubranić
Aleksandar Čubranić

31 March 2020 in Anticancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLuka Simetić
Luka Simetić
KBKrešimir Blažičević
Krešimir Blažičević
KMKata Međugorac
Kata Međugorac
Marin GolčićMarin Golčić
Marin Golčić
DHDavorin Herceg
Davorin Herceg
Background/Aim: There is a lack of quality biomarkers of survival for patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy. Although the baseline level of S100 has prognostic value, its role during/after therapy in survival is unclear. Patients and Methods: We evaluated patients with metastatic melanoma treated with pembrolizumab with the goal of analysing the relationship between a relative change in S100 level at 12 weeks of immunotherapy and survival. Results: Patients with a relative change in S100 level >145% at 12 weeks of immunotherapy had significantly shorter progression-free (5.1 vs. 18.5 months, p≤0.0001) and overall survival (5.7 vs. 26.3 months, p<0.0001), further confirmed on multivariate analysis with hazard ratio of 32.25 (95% confidence interval=4.78–217.6, p=0.0004) for overall survival. Conclusion: A relative change in S100 level might be useful as a more precise biomarker of survival for patients with metastatic melanoma treated with pembrolizumab.