Background: Education plays a pivotal role in the care of oncological patients, reducing health costs, hospital readmission, and disease relapses. Education can be supportive in achieving multiple outcomes, improving symptom control and quality of life. A new approach is emerging in patient education: gamification. Gamification was defined as the “use of game elements in non-game contexts”, including the application of games in serious contexts. The aim of this review is to explore the use of gamification in the oncology setting. Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted in the MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases using the JBI guidelines. Results: The 13 included reports were critically appraised by two reviewers independently. It seems that gamification could be effective both in prevention and cancer treatments. Gamification also seems to improve chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting management, quality of life, and reduced anxiety levels in different cancer groups. Moreover, gamification seems effective in improving self-care in cancer patients, regardless of gender, age, and ethnicity. Conclusions: Gamification improves patient engagement and biopsychosocial outcomes and could represent a valid approach to cancer patient education; however, it is not a substitute for healthcare professionals, who remain the leaders in the education process.

Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) has been identified as a World Health Organization health priority. In particular, urge UI (UUI) refers to urine leakage associated with a sudden and compelling desire to void urine. It affects quality of life more than other kinds of UI, but it is not always treated adequately. For these reasons, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of conservative treatment practices to counteract UUI in women aged 40–65 years old. Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. According to the protocol registered in PROSPERO, a systematic search was carried out in the CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus and Web of Science databases up to October 2022, to find primary studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Results: Fourteen studies were included. The scientific literature reported different strategies dealing with the problem of UUI, some purely physical, others physical and psycho-educational and others exclusively psychological. Conclusion: Conservative treatments are useful to aid the reduction in UUI episodes in middle-aged women. However, none of them can be considered more effective than others due to the impossibility of conducting meta-analytical analyses. Further studies comparing the effectiveness of conservative treatments for UUI are needed.

Background: Meals are central to daily life, health, and social participation, yet their safety and enjoyment can be compromised in people with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD). Despite the broad impact of OD on physical and psychosocial well-being and daily functioning, structured guidance for comprehensive mealtime management in clinical practice is lacking. To address this gap, a set of expert consensus-based “Do’s and Don’ts” covering four meal-related domains was developed. Methods: A modified Delphi consensus study promoted by the Italian Society of Deglutology involved a multidisciplinary panel of 53 experts in OD and related disciplines. Experts developed “Do” and “Don’t” statements across four domains: nutrition-focused diet prescription, meal preparation, mealtime experience, and patient and caregiver education. After panel conveners’ review, 61 statements underwent two rounds of online voting using a 3-point ordinal scale plus an additional option ‘unable to express an opinion’. Consensus was predefined as ≥75% agreement. Statements were revised between rounds based on participants’ comments to ensure clinical accuracy and practical applicability. Results: The response rate was 85% for Round 1 and 97.8% for Round 2. After Round 2, 57 of 61 statements (93.4%) reached the consensus threshold (≥75% agreement). Conclusions: Mealtime management in OD should be individualized and person-centered, balancing swallowing safety, nutritional requirements, quality of life, and enjoyment of eating. Management should extend beyond compensatory strategies alone to include the social and relational dimensions of meals. Active involvement and education of patients and caregivers are essential to support therapeutic adherence and daily implementation of recommendations. Interprofessional collaboration and multimodal educational strategies are crucial to ensuring a coordinated, safe, and effective nutritional approach to OD care.