Jeroen Schokker

Dr. Jeroen Schokker

Geomodelling, TNO - Geological Survey of the Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2007 in Quaternary Geochronology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJakob Wallinga
Jakob Wallinga
ABAdrie J.J. Bos
Adrie J.J. Bos
PDPieter Dorenbos
Pieter Dorenbos
AMAndrew S. Murray
Andrew S. Murray
Jeroen SchokkerJeroen Schokker
Jeroen Schokker

10 November 2023 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EPElena A. Pearce
Elena A. Pearce
Mazier FlorenceMazier Florence
Mazier Florence
SNSigne Normand
Signe Normand
RFRalph McKinlay Fyfe
Ralph McKinlay Fyfe
VAValérie Andrieu
Valérie Andrieu
Jens-Christian SvenningJens-Christian Svenning
Jens-Christian Svenning
The extent of vegetation openness in past European landscapes is widely debated. In particular, the temperate forest biome has traditionally been defined as dense, closed-canopy forest; however, some argue that large herbivores maintained greater openness or even wood-pasture conditions. Here, we address this question for the Last Interglacial period (129,000–116,000 years ago), before Homo sapiens –linked megafauna declines and anthropogenic landscape transformation. We applied the vegetation reconstruction method REVEALS to 96 Last Interglacial pollen records. We found that light woodland and open vegetation represented, on average, more than 50% cover during this period. The degree of openness was highly variable and only partially linked to climatic factors, indicating the importance of natural disturbance regimes. Our results show that the temperate forest biome was historically heterogeneous rather than uniformly dense, which is consistent with the dependency of much of contemporary European biodiversity on open vegetation and light woodland.

1 December 2013 in Netherlands Journal of Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMichiel Van Der Meulen
Michiel Van Der Meulen
JDJ.C. Doornenbal
J.C. Doornenbal
JGJ.L. Gunnink
J.L. Gunnink
Jan StafleuJan Stafleu
Jan Stafleu
Jeroen SchokkerJeroen Schokker
Jeroen Schokker
TDT.M. van Daalen
T.M. van Daalen
Over the last ten to twenty years, geological surveys all over the world have been entangled in a process of digitisation. Their paper archives, built over many decades, have largely been replaced by electronic databases. The systematic production of geological map sheets is being replaced by 3D subsurface modelling, the results of which are distributed electronically. In the Netherlands, this transition is both being accelerated and concluded by a new law that will govern management and utilisation of subsurface information. Under this law, the Geological Survey of the Netherlands has been commissioned to build a key register for the subsurface: a single national database for subsurface data and information, which Dutch government bodies are obliged to use when making policies or decisions that pertain to, or can be affected by the subsurface. This requires the Survey to rethink and redesign a substantial part of its operation: from data acquisition and interpretation to delivery. It has also helped shape our view on geological surveying in the future.The key register, which is expected to start becoming operational in 2015, will contain vast quantities of subsurface data, as well as their interpretation into 3D models. The obligatory consultation of the register will raise user expectations of the reliability of all information it contains, and requires a strong focus on confidence issues. Building the necessary systems and meeting quality requirements is our biggest challenge in the upcoming years. The next step change will be towards building 4D models, which represent not only geological conditions in space, but also processes in time such as subsidence, anthropogenic effects, and those associated with global change.

1 November 2005 in Quaternary Science Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jeroen SchokkerJeroen Schokker
Jeroen Schokker
PCPiet Cleveringa
Piet Cleveringa
AMAndrew S. Murray
Andrew S. Murray
JWJakob Wallinga
Jakob Wallinga
WWWim E. Westerhoff
Wim E. Westerhoff

19 December 2006 in Journal of Soils and Sediments
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMichiel Van Der Meulen
Michiel Van Der Meulen
ASAd van der Spek
Ad van der Spek
GLGer de Lange
Ger de Lange
SGStephan H. L. L. Gruijters
Stephan H. L. L. Gruijters
SGSerge F. van Gessel
Serge F. van Gessel
RKRob A. A. van der Krogt
Rob A. A. van der Krogt

1 February 2004 in Journal of Quaternary Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jeroen SchokkerJeroen Schokker
Jeroen Schokker
PCPiet Cleveringa
Piet Cleveringa
AMAndrew S. Murray
Andrew S. Murray