Peter M. Bach

Dr. Peter M. Bach

Urban Water Management, Eawag, Switzerland / Monash University, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2014 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Peter M. BachPeter M. Bach
Peter M. Bach
WRWolfgang Rauch
Wolfgang Rauch
PMPeter Steen Mikkelsen
Peter Steen Mikkelsen
David McCarthyDavid McCarthy
David McCarthy
ADAna Deletic
Ana Deletic

1 March 2020 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BJBehzad Jamali
Behzad Jamali
Peter M. BachPeter M. Bach
Peter M. Bach
ADAna Deletic
Ana Deletic

1 September 2018 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BJBehzad Jamali
Behzad Jamali
RLRoland Löwe
Roland Löwe
Peter M. BachPeter M. Bach
Peter M. Bach
CUChristian Urich
Christian Urich
KAKarsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen
Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen
ADAna Deletic
Ana Deletic

1 December 2010 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMonique de Moel
Monique de Moel
Peter M. BachPeter M. Bach
Peter M. Bach
ABAbdelmalek Bouazza
Abdelmalek Bouazza
Rao Martand SinghRao Martand Singh
Rao Martand Singh
JSJingLiang O. Sun
JingLiang O. Sun

1 October 2017 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMartijn Kuller
Martijn Kuller
Peter M. BachPeter M. Bach
Peter M. Bach
DRDiego Ramirez-Lovering
Diego Ramirez-Lovering
ADAna Deletic
Ana Deletic

1 October 2019 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MKMartijn Kuller
Martijn Kuller
Peter M. BachPeter M. Bach
Peter M. Bach
SRSimon Roberts
Simon Roberts
DBDale Browne
Dale Browne
ADAna Deletic
Ana Deletic
Distributed green stormwater management infrastructure is increasingly applied worldwide to counter the negative impacts of urbanisation and climate change, while providing a range of benefits related to ecosystem services. They are known as Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) in Australia, Nature Based Solutions (NBS) in Europe, Low Impact Development (LID) in the USA, and Sponge City systems in China. Urban planning for WSUD has been ad-hoc, lacking strategy and resulting in sub-optimal outcomes. The purpose of this study is to help improve strategic WSUD planning and placement through the development of a Planning Support System. This paper presents the development of Spatial Suitability ANalysis TOol (SSANTO), a rapid GIS-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis tool using a flexible mix of techniques to map suitability for WSUD assets across urban areas. SSANTO applies a novel WSUD suitability framework, which conceptualises spatial suitability for WSUD implementation from two perspectives: 'Needs' and 'Opportunities' for WSUD. It combines biophysical as well as socio-economic, planning and governance criteria ('Opportunities') with criteria relating to ecosystem services ('Needs'). Testing SSANTO through comparing its results to work done by a WSUD consultancy successfully verified its algorithms and demonstrated its capability to reflect and potentially enhance the outcomes of planning processes. Manual GIS based suitability analysis is time and resource intensive. Through its rapid suitability analysis, SSANTO facilitates iterative spatial analysis for exploration of scenarios and stakeholder preferences. It thus facilitates collaborative planning and deeper understanding of the relationship between diverse and complex urban contexts and urban planning outcomes for WSUD.