Xu Tao

Dr. Xu Tao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2019 in Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CWChenglong Wu
Chenglong Wu
XTXiaobo Tian
Xiaobo Tian
XTXu Tao
Xu Tao
XLXiaofeng Liang
Xiaofeng Liang
YCYun Chen
Yun Chen
JTJiwen Teng
Jiwen Teng

1 May 2015 in Science China Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XTXu Tao
Xu Tao
ZZZhongJie Zhang
ZhongJie Zhang
BLBaoFeng Liu
BaoFeng Liu
YCYun Chen
Yun Chen
MZMingHui Zhang
MingHui Zhang
JTJiWen Teng
JiWen Teng

1 September 2018 in Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XWXu Wang
Xu Wang
LCLing Chen
Ling Chen
YAYinshuang Ai
Yinshuang Ai
XTXu Tao
Xu Tao
MJMingming Jiang
Mingming Jiang
YGYifan Gao
Yifan Gao

1 June 2019 in Tectonophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLin Chen
Lin Chen
XSXiaodong Song
Xiaodong Song
TGTaras V. Gerya
Taras V. Gerya
XTXu Tao
Xu Tao
YCYun Chen
Yun Chen


30 May 2016 in Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYoushan Liu
Youshan Liu
JTJiwen Teng
Jiwen Teng
XTXu Tao
Xu Tao
ZBZhiming Bai
Zhiming Bai
HLHaiqiang Lan
Haiqiang Lan
JBJosé Badal
José Badal
In correlative least-squares reverse time migration (CLSRTM), the estimation of the optimal step size is usually determined by fitting a parabola and finding its minimum; it involves at least two times extra reading of all seismic records, which significantly lowers the efficiency of the algorithm. To improve the efficiency of the CLSRTM algorithm, we have deduced an analytical step-length (ASL) formula based on the linear property of the demigration operator. Numerical examples performed with the data synthetized by the Marmousi and Sigsbee2A models were used to test its validity. In complex models with imperfect migration velocity, such as the Sigabee2A model, our formula makes the value of the objective function converges to a much smaller minimum. Additional numerical tests performed with the data either acquired irregularly or contaminated by different noise levels verify the robustness of the ASL formula. Compared with the commonly used parabolic search method, the ASL formula is much more efficient because it is free from an extra estimation of the value of the objective function.