Philip Moons

Prof. Dr. Philip Moons

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 August 2020 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HBHelmut Baumgartner
Helmut Baumgartner
JBJulie De Backer
Julie De Backer
SBSonya V Babu-Narayan
Sonya V Babu-Narayan
WBWerner Budts
Werner Budts
MCMassimo Chessa
Massimo Chessa
EGESC Scientific Document Group
ESC Scientific Document Group
Guidelines summarize and evaluate available evidence with the aim of assisting health professionals in proposing the best management strategies for an individual patient with a given condition. Guidelines and their recommendations should facilitate decision making of health professionals in their daily practice. However, the final decisions concerning an individual patient must be made by the responsible health professional(s) in consultation with the patient and caregiver as appropriate.

27 August 2010 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
E(Endorsed by the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology (AEPC)
Endorsed by the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology (AEPC)
HBHelmut Baumgartner
Helmut Baumgartner
PBPhilipp Bonhoeffer
Philipp Bonhoeffer
NGNatasja M.S. De Groot
Natasja M.S. De Groot
FHFokko de Haan
Fokko de Haan
JWJørgen Westby
Jørgen Westby
Guidelines summarize and evaluate all currently available evidence on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient, suffering from a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk–benefit ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines are no substitutes for textbooks, and their legal implications have been discussed previously. Guidelines and recommendations should help physicians to make decisions in their daily practice. However, the ultimate judgement regarding the care of an individual patient must be made by his/her responsible physician(s).

11 June 2019 in Quality of Life Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TNThe Livsforsk Network
The Livsforsk Network
KHK. Haraldstad
K. Haraldstad
AWA. Wahl
A. Wahl
RAR. Andenæs
R. Andenæs
JAJohn Roger Andersen
John Roger Andersen
SHS. Helseth
S. Helseth
Purpose Quality of life (QOL) is an important concept in the field of health and medicine. QOL is a complex concept that is interpreted and defined differently within and between disciplines, including the fields of health and medicine. The aims of this study were to systematically review the literature on QOL in medicine and health research and to describe the country of origin, target groups, instruments, design, and conceptual issues. Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify research studies on QOL and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The databases Scopus, which includes Embase and MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for articles published during one random week in November 2016. The ten predefined criteria of Gill and Feinstein were used to evaluate the conceptual and methodological rigor. Results QOL research is international and involves a variety of target groups, research designs, and QOL measures. According to the criteria of Gill and Feinstein, the results show that only 13% provided a definition of QOL, 6% distinguished QOL from HRQOL. The most frequently fulfilled criteria were: (i) stating the domains of QOL to be measured; (ii) giving a reason for choosing the instruments used; and (iii) aggregating the results from multiple items. Conclusion QOL is an important endpoint in medical and health research, and QOL research involves a variety of patient groups and different research designs. Based on the current evaluation of the methodological and conceptual clarity of QOL research, we conclude that the majority QOL studies in health and medicine have conceptual and methodological challenges.

30 November 2010 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PMPhilip Moons
Philip Moons
LBLore Bovijn
Lore Bovijn
WBWerner Budts
Werner Budts
ABAnn Belmans
Ann Belmans
MGMarc Gewillig
Marc Gewillig
Background—: Over the past decades, the life expectancy of individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) has increased significantly. However, precise estimates for survival to adulthood are scarce for patients with CHD. We investigated the proportion of CHD patients born between 1990 and 1992 who survived into adulthood. We also compared their survival with that of CHD patients born in earlier eras and evaluated survival as a function of the type of heart defect. Methods and Results—: We reviewed the CHD program administrative and clinical database at the University Hospitals Leuven (Leuven, Belgium) and analyzed the records of 7497 CHD patients born from 1970 to 1992. Survival to 18 years of age in patients born between 1990 and 1992 was 88.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.3% to 90.5%), which was significantly greater than that of patients born in previous decades ( P <0.0001). For patients born between 1990 and 1992, survival into adulthood for those with mild heart defects was 98.0% (95% CI, 95.8% to 99.1%), whereas survival for those with moderate- and severe-complexity heart defects was 90.0% (95% CI, 86.8% to 92.5%) and 56.4% (95% CI, 47.4% to 64.5%), respectively. Analysis per heart defect confirmed these findings, demonstrating that patients with univentricular heart (49.1% [95% CI, 30.8% to 65.1%]) and hypoplastic left heart syndrome (7.5% [95% CI, 0.6% to 26.6%]) had the poorest survival rate. Conclusion—: This study demonstrates that almost 90% of children with CHD have the prospect of surviving into adulthood.

28 June 2010 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WDWillem Drenthen
Willem Drenthen
EBEric Boersma
Eric Boersma
ABAli Balci
Ali Balci
PMPhilip Moons
Philip Moons
JRJolien W. Roos-Hesselink
Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink
OIOn behalf of the ZAHARA Investigators
On behalf of the ZAHARA Investigators
Data regarding pregnancy outcome in women with congenital heart disease (CHD) are limited. In 1802 women with CHD, 1302 completed pregnancies were observed. Independent predictors of cardiac, obstetric, and neonatal complications were calculated using logistic regression. The most prevalent cardiac complications during pregnancy were arrhythmias (4.7%) and heart failure (1.6%). Factors independently associated with maternal cardiac complications were the presence of cyanotic heart disease (corrected/uncorrected) (P < 0.0001), the use of cardiac medication before pregnancy (P < 0.0001), and left heart obstruction (P < 0.0001). New characteristics were mechanical valve replacement (P = 0.0014), and systemic (P = 0.04) or pulmonary atrioventricular valve regurgitation related with the underlying (moderately) complex CHD (P = 0.03). A new risk score for cardiac complications is proposed. The most prevalent obstetric complications were hypertensive complications (12.2%). No correlation of maternal characteristics with adverse obstetric outcome was found. The most prevalent neonatal complications were premature birth (12%), small for gestational age (14%), and mortality (4%). Cyanotic heart disease (corrected/uncorrected) (P = 0.0003), mechanical valve replacement (P = 0.03), maternal smoking (P = 0.007), multiple gestation (P = 0.0014), and the use of cardiac medication (P = 0.0009) correlated with adverse neonatal outcome. In our tertiary CHD cohort, cardiac, obstetric, and neonatal complications were frequently encountered, and (new) correlations of maternal baseline data with adverse outcome are reported. A new risk score for adverse cardiac complications is proposed, although prospective validation remains necessary.

1 June 2007 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WDWillem Drenthen
Willem Drenthen
PPPetronella G. Pieper
Petronella G. Pieper
JRJolien W. Roos-Hesselink
Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink
WLWillem A. van Lottum
Willem A. van Lottum
AVAdriaan A. Voors
Adriaan A. Voors
DVDirk J. van Veldhuisen
Dirk J. van Veldhuisen