Alexander Klimchouk

Dr. Alexander Klimchouk


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2009 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAlexander Klimchouk
Alexander Klimchouk

1 January 2016 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAlexander Klimchouk
Alexander Klimchouk
AAAugusto Auler
Augusto Auler
FBFrancisco H.R. Bezerra
Francisco H.R. Bezerra
CCCaroline L. Cazarin
Caroline L. Cazarin
Fabrizio BalsamoFabrizio Balsamo
Fabrizio Balsamo
YDYuri Dublyansky
Yuri Dublyansky

1 October 2018 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YDYuri V. Dublyansky
Yuri V. Dublyansky
AKAlexander Klimchouk
Alexander Klimchouk
STSergey V. Tokarev
Sergey V. Tokarev
GAGennady N. Amelichev
Gennady N. Amelichev
LLLukas Langhamer
Lukas Langhamer
CSChristoph Spötl
Christoph Spötl

20 November 2008 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CRC. Rehrl
C. Rehrl
SBS. Birk
S. Birk
AKAlexander Klimchouk
Alexander Klimchouk
To examine the interrelation between hydrogeological environment and conduit development in deep‐seated settings, a conceptual model is tested by numerical modeling. Based on field observations, simplified model settings are designed and crucial parameters are varied. A coupled continuum‐pipe flow model is employed for simulating conduit development within the soluble unit of a multilayer aquifer system. In agreement with field observations, the evolving cave patterns are characterized by pronounced horizontal passages and multiple vertical conduits at the bottom of the soluble unit but only few at the top. The frequency distribution of conduit diameters is found to be bimodal if the permeability of the rock formation is sufficiently high to allow competitive conduit development governed by the feedback between increasing flow and dissolution rates. This feedback, however, is suppressed in low‐permeability formations. As a consequence, conduit development is uniform rather than competitive.

1 February 2016 in Acta Carsologica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAlexander Klimchouk
Alexander Klimchouk
The paper examines representative definitions of karst (21), and discusses some concepts that influenced the modern understanding of the phenomenon. Several trends are discussed that took karst science beyond the limits of the traditional paradigm of karst. Dramatic progress in studies of speleogenesis plays the most significant role in changes taking place in the general understanding of karst. Also important is an adoption of the broad perspective to karst evolution which goes beyond the contemporary geomorphologic epoch and encompasses the entire life of a geological formation. Speleogenesis is viewed as a dynamic hydrogeological process of self-organization of the permeability structure in soluble rocks, a mechanism of the specific evolution of the groundwater flow system. The result is that these systems acquire a new, "karstic", quality and more complex organization. Since almost all essential attributes of karst owe their origin to speleogenesis, the latter is considered as the primary mechanism of the formation of karst. Two fundamental types of speleogenesis, hypogene and epigene, differentiate mainly due to distinct hydrodynamic characteristics of the respective groundwater flow systems: (1) of layered aquifer systems and fracture-vein flow systems of varying depths and degrees of confinement, and (2) of hydrodynamically open, near-surface unconfined systems. Accordingly, two major genetic types of karst are distinguished: hypogene and epigene. They differ in many characteristics, notably in relationships with the surface, hydrogeological behaviour, groundwater quality, and the areas of practical importance and approaches to solving karst-related issues. Although views on essential attributes of karst have been clearly changing, this was not reflected in definitions of the notion which are in broad use in the earth-science literature. A refined approach is suggested to the notion of karst in which it is viewed as a groundwater (fluid) flow system of a specific kind, which has acquired its peculiar properties in the course of speleogenesis.Kraška paradigma: spremembe, trendi in perspektiveDokument obravnava reprezentativne definicije krasa (21) in obravnava nekatere koncepte, ki so vplivali na sodobno razumevanje tega pojava. Razpravlja o več trendih, ki so popeljali krasoslovje preko meja tradicionalne paradigme krasa. Dramatični napredek v speleogenetskih raziskavah je igral najpomembnejšo vlogo pri spremembah, ki so se zgodile pri splošnem razumevanju krasa. Prav tako je za razvoj krasoslovja pomembno sprejetje široke perspektive, ki presega sodobno geomorfološko epoho in zajema celoten geološki razvoj. Speleogeneza je predstavljena kot dinamični hidrogeološki proces samoorganizacije stopnje prepustnosti posameznih struktur v topnih kamninah, to je kot mehanizem specifičnega razvoja sistema toka podzemne vode. Posledica tega je, da ti sistemi potrebujejo novo, "kraško", kakovostno in bolj kompleksno organizacijo. Ker skoraj vse bistvene značilnosti krasa izvirajo iz speleogeneze, je slednja šteta kot primarni mehanizem za nastanek krasa. Dve temeljni vrsti speleogeneze, hipogena in epigena, se razlikujeta predvsem zaradi različnih hidrodinamičnih značilnosti posameznih sistemov toka podzemne vode: (1) plastoviti vodonosni sistemi in tokovni sistemi po prelomih in žilah različnih globin in stopenj zaprtosti, ter (2) hidrodinamično odprti in plitvi sistemi. Posledično razlikujemo dva velika genetska tipa krasa: hipogeni in epigeni. Med seboj se razlikujeta v mnogih značilnostih, predvsem v odnosih s površjem, po hidrogeološkem obnašanju, kakovosti podzemne vode, ter na področjih praktičnega pomena in pristopov k reševanju vprašanj, povezanih s krasom. Čeprav so se stališča o bistvenih lastnostih krasa spreminjala, se to ni odrazilo v opredelitvi pojma, ki se na splošno uporablja v vedah o Zemlji. Pri predstavah o krasu predlagamo dodelan pristop, v katerem je poudarek na sistemu podzemne vode (tekočine) s specifičnim načinom pretakanja, ki je pridobilo svoje značilne lastnosti prav tekom speleogeneze.

11 May 2005 in Environmental Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AKAlexander Klimchouk
Alexander Klimchouk
SAS. D. Aksem
S. D. Aksem