The ongoing spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) poses a significant threat to global health. As the coronavirus outbreak began spreading, hospitals were forced to relocate resources to treat the growing number of COVID-19 patients. As a consequence, doctors across the country canceled tens of thousands of nonurgent surgeries. However, recognizing that the COVID-19 situation may be highly variable and fluid in different communities across the country, elective surgery could be still allowed in some centers for patients included in the high-priority class. The majority of endocrine disorders requiring surgical treatment in patients identifiable as first-priority class, or needing hospitalization within 30 days, are generally represented by malignant thyroid tumors, hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, and some adrenal disorders. The need for urgent intervention is evaluated on a case-by-case basis according to the severity of the symptoms, the likelihood of progression, and global clinical judgment. On the basis of the above indications, during the last 4 weeks, we performed 18 planned surgical treatments in patients with thyroid cancer (total thyroidectomies, plus lymph node dissection if needed) or multinodular toxic goiter. In no case, postoperative ventilatory support was needed, and the average hospital stay was 3 days. The negative COVID-19 status for all the treated patients was appropriately evaluated beforehand. Nobody knows how long the current COVID-19 pandemic will be lasting. Certainly, we will be requested in the next future to incrementally offer surgical services for endocrine disorders that have been deferred for the COVID-19 pandemic.

Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), which occurs in 6–12% of patients previously treated with surgery, with or without pre-operative chemoradiation therapy, represents a complex and heterogeneous disease profoundly affecting the patient’s quality of life (QoL) and long-term survival. Its management usually requires a multidisciplinary approach, to evaluate the several aspects of a LRRC, such as resectability or the best approach to reduce symptoms. Surgical treatment is more complex and usually needs high-volume centers to obtain a higher rate of radical (R0) resections and to reduce the rate of postoperative complications. Multiple factors related to the patient, to the primary tumor, and to the surgery for the primary tumor contribute to the development of local recurrence. Accurate pre-treatment staging of the recurrence is essential, and several classification systems are currently used for this purpose. Achieving an R0 resection through radical surgery remains the most critical factor for a favorable oncologic outcome, although both chemotherapy and radiotherapy play a significant role in facilitating this goal. If a R0 resection of a LRRC is not feasible, palliative treatment is mandatory to reduce the LRRC-related symptoms, especially pain, minimizing the effect of the recurrence on the QoL of the patients. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive narrative review of the literature regarding the management of LRRC.

Background/Objectives: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is a serious vascular complication in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). It is associated with a high risk of graft loss, re-transplantation (re-OLT), and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and management of HAT, analyzing potential risk factors. The secondary objectives included quantifying 90-day postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. Methods: In this retrospective, observational, single-center study, data from liver transplant donors and recipients who underwent OLT between 2004 and 2024 were analyzed. HAT was classified as early (e-HAT, ≤30 days) or late (l-HAT, >30 days). Univariate statistical analysis was performed to identify the risk factors associated with HAT occurrence. Multivariate analysis was not performed due to the small number of HAT events, which would increase the risk of model overfitting. Results: In the 20 year study period, a total of 532 OLTs were performed, including 37 re-OLTs. The rates of major morbidity, reoperation, and mortality within 90 days were 44.5%, 22.3%, and 7.1%, respectively. HAT occurred in 2.4% of cases (e-HAT: 1.6%; l-HAT: 0.7%). Among e-HAT cases, 66.6% were asymptomatic and identified through routine postoperative Doppler ultrasound. All e-HAT cases were surgically treated, with a re-OLT rate of 33.3%. Three l-HAT cases required re-OLT. Overall, the HAT-related mortality and re-OLT rates were 7.6% and 46.1%, respectively. At a follow-up of 86 months, the rate of graft loss was 9.2%, and the rate of post-OLT survival was 77%. Patients who developed HAT had a higher donor-to-recipient body weight ratio and longer warm ischemia times (WITs). Additionally, patients undergoing re-OLT had a higher risk of developing HAT. Conclusions: Although the incidence of HAT is low, its clinical consequences are severe. Early Doppler ultrasound surveillance is crucial for detecting e-HAT and preventing graft loss. A high donor-to-recipient body weight ratio, a prolonged warm ischemia time, and re-OLT seem to be associated with a high risk of HAT.

Sex steroid hormones and systemic iron metabolism are emerging as modulators of colorectal cancer (CRC) development and progression. However, information linking systemic factors to tumor characteristics and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is limited, particularly in a sex-specific context. We measured serum levels of sex hormones [testosterone, estradiol, progesterone, Luteinizing Hormone (LH), Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH), Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)] and iron-related biomarkers (iron, transferrin, ferritin, % transferrin saturation, ceruloplasmin, and the ceruloplasmin/transferrin ratio) in 82 CRC patients and 31 healthy controls. EMT-related proteins [mediator of ErbB2-driven cell motility 1 (MEMO1), E-cadherin, fibronectin, vimentin, and vinculin] were quantified by Western blotting in tumor and adjacent normal mucosa. Non-parametric tests and Spearman correlations were applied, stratified by sex and corrected for age and anemia where appropriate. Progesterone levels were significantly lower in male CRC patients (median 0.17 ng/mL vs. 0.20 ng/mL, p = 0.04) and higher in female patients (0.17 ng/mL vs. 0.10 ng/mL, p = 0.0077) compared with controls. The iron-related biomarkers indicated a pattern of iron deficiency, including in non-anemic patients, with reduced % transferrin saturation (p < 0.01) and an elevated ceruloplasmin/transferrin ratio (p = 0.02). Correlations were found between iron status, tumor stage, and hormonal levels. Progesterone correlated with EMT protein expression in healthy mucosa (e.g., fibronectin in females: ρ = 0.567, p = 0.014; vimentin in males: ρ = −0.446, p = 0.007), but not in tumor tissue. In the healthy mucosa of male patients, ceruloplasmin/transferrin correlated with MEMO1 (ρ = 0.419, p = 0.04), vinculin (ρ = 0.299, p = 0.041), and vimentin (ρ = 0.394, p = 0.07); transferrin levels inversely correlated with MEMO1 expression (ρ = −0.392, p = 0.032), and vimentin showed a positive correlation with serum iron (ρ = 0.350, p = 0.043). Furthermore, fibronectin expression inversely correlated with iron in the sole tumor tissue of female patients (ρ = −0.366, p = 0.040). These findings support the role of sex hormones and iron metabolism in CRC biology, suggesting that EMT might be accompanied by altered iron uptake and redox remodeling, which can enhance cellular motility and the metastatic potential.

Background/Objectives: Life expectancy for people in their 60s is 24.3 years in high-income countries. Health systems face the burden of disease in the elderly population and must assess the impact of treatments such as major surgery. The aim of this study is to quantify the impact of advanced age on short-term postoperative outcomes after resective colorectal surgery (RCRS). Methods: All patients who underwent RCRS at our institution between July 2022 and November 2023 were entered into a database. Preoperative, perioperative, and early (within 30 days) postoperative data were recorded. Patients were categorized into a young group (under 75 years, YG) and an elderly group (over 75 years, EG). A retrospective comparative analysis of postoperative outcomes was performed between the two groups; postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien classification. Results: Fifty-three and ninety-five patients were in the EG and YG, respectively. Indications for RCRS was cancer in 83% of EG patients and 61.1% of YG patients (p = 0.006), and the clinical presentation, localization, and rate of neoadjuvant treatment in oncological patients were comparable. Another indication for RCRS was complicated diverticular disease (17% of EG patients and 38.9% of YG patients; p = 0.006). With respect to the baseline characteristics, the ASA and CCI scores were worse in the EG (p = 0.001). No significant differences in the surgical approach, mini-invasive approach, conversion rate, definitive stoma creation, or number of harvested lymph nodes were found between the two groups. Overall, EG reported a higher relative risk (RR) of short-term postoperative complications (1.64, CI: 1.03–2.63), but no significant differences were found in terms of grade ≥3 complications (RR: 0.9, CI: 0.23–3.44). In the EG, a higher risk of ICU admission (RR:2.69, CI: 1.5–4.8) and a one-day longer postoperative hospital stay (6 vs. 5 days) were reported. Conclusions: Advanced age does not seem to contraindicate RCRS, especially in colorectal cancer patients. The impact of elderly age on short-term outcomes seems to be minimal and acceptable.

Organ-preserving strategies have gained increasing relevance in the management of rectal cancer, driven by the improved ability of neoadjuvant therapies to induce major and complete tumor regression. The introduction of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT), delivered through induction and/or consolidation chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy, has substantially increased both pathological and clinical complete response rates. This progress has renewed interest in non-operative management—namely Watch-and-Wait (W&W)—and in local excision (LE) as potential alternatives to total mesorectal excision (TME). However, the W&W strategy raises important oncologic concerns, including a non-negligible rate of local regrowth—consistently reported at approximately 20–30%—which is associated with inferior distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival. These limitations underscore the inherent uncertainty in reliably defining a true clinical complete response. Within this context, LE may serve as a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic modality by confirming the pathological response, improving local control through removal of residual resistant tumor clones, and enabling more accurate stratification of patients suitable for organ preservation versus those requiring completion TME. Overall, while TNT has expanded the therapeutic opportunities for rectal preservation, LE appears to play a critical role in reducing the discordance between clinical and pathological assessment, thereby offering a more oncologically secure pathway toward organ preservation. This narrative review discusses the current role, benefits, and limitations of organ-preserving approaches after TNT in both locally advanced and early rectal cancer.