Poultry products in Zambia form an integral part of the human diet in many households, as they are cheap and easy to produce. The burden of poultry diseases has, however, remained a major challenge. Growing consumer demand for poultry products in Zambia has resulted in non-prudent antimicrobial use on farms, intending to prevent and treat poultry diseases for growth optimisation and maximising profits. This cross-sectional study aimed to identify the different types of bacteria causing diseases in chickens in Lusaka and to detect the extended-spectrum lactamase (ESBL)-encoding genes. We collected 215 samples from 91 diseased chickens at three post-mortem facilities and screened them for Gram-negative bacteria. Of these samples, 103 tested positive for various clinically relevant Enterobacteriaceae, including Enterobacter (43/103, 41.7%), Escherichia coli (20/103, 19.4%), Salmonella (10/103, 9.7%), and Shigella (8/103, 7.8%). Other isolated bacteria included Yersinia, Morganella, Proteus, and Klebsiella, which accounted for 21.4%. E. coli, Enterobacter, Salmonella, and Shigella were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The results revealed that E. coli, Enterobacter, and Shigella were highly resistant to tetracycline, ampicillin, amoxicillin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, while Salmonella showed complete susceptibility to all tested antibiotics. The observed resistance patterns correlated with antimicrobial usage estimated from sales data from a large-scale wholesale and retail company. Six (6/14, 42.9%) E. coli isolates tested positive for bla_CTX-M, whilst eight (8/14, 57.1%) Enterobacter samples tested positive for bla_TEM. Interestingly, four (4/6, 66.7%) of the E. coli isolates carrying bla_CTX-M-positive strains were also positive for bla_TEM. Sanger sequencing of the PCR products revealed that five (5/6, 83.3%) of the abovementioned isolates possessed the bla_CTX-M-15 allele. The results suggest the presence of potentially pathogenic ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in poultry, threatening public health.

Background/Objectives: Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) remains a growing public health threat, underscoring the need for robust surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (AMC) and Antimicrobial Use (AMU). This study analysed AMC and AMU trends in Zambia’s human and animal health sectors, identifying priority areas for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) under a One Health framework. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in February 2025, utilising data from 2018 to 2023. Sources of data included the Zambia Medicines Regulatory Authority (ZAMRA) and the WOAH Animal Antimicrobial Use (ANIMUSE) Global Database platform. AMC was analysed using the WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) methodology. Antimicrobials were classified using the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) system, and consumption was measured in Defined Daily Doses (DDDs) per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID). Antibiotics were further categorised using the WHO Access, Watch, and Reserve (AwaRe) classification. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPPS version 25.0. Results: In the human health sector, oral antibiotics accounted for 88% of total consumption. Penicillins (33%), cephalosporins (19.2%), and macrolides (12.4%) were the most consumed classes. In 2023, 98,651,882.42 DDDs per 1000 inhabitants/day were recorded, with amoxicillin, ceftriaxone, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim leading as the most consumed antibiotics. According to the consumption of antibiotics by the WHO AwaRe classification, 47% were Access, 40% Watch, and 3% Reserve group antibiotics. In animal health, tetracyclines dominated (63%), followed by sulphonamides (26%) and penicillins (11%). AMU in animal health peaked in 2023. Conclusions: This study found high AMC and AMU, especially Watch-group antibiotics and tetracyclines, highlighting the need for strengthened antimicrobial stewardship, regulatory oversight, and integrated One Health surveillance to mitigate AMR risks in Zambia.

Background/Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health threat that undermines treatment in humans and animals. In Zambia, where livestock production underpins food security and livelihoods, AMR challenges are aggravated by limited surveillance, weak diagnostics, and poor regulatory enforcement, facilitating the spread of resistant pathogens across the human–animal–environment interface. This study aims to analyse AMR patterns of bacterial isolates collected from Zambia’s animal health sector between 2020 and 2024, to generate evidence that informs national AMR surveillance, supports antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions, and strengthens One Health strategies to mitigate the spread of resistant pathogens. Methods: We conducted a retrospective descriptive analysis of previously collected routine laboratory data from five well-established animal health AMR surveillance sentinel sites between January 2020 and December 2024. Data were analysed by year, sample type, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) profiles using WHONET. Results: A total of 1688 samples were processed, with faecal samples accounting for 87.6%. Animal environmental samples (feed, manure, litter, abattoir/meat processing floor, wall, and equipment surface swabs) (collected from abattoirs, water, and farms) increased significantly over time (p = 0.027). Overall, Escherichia coli (E. coli) (50.4%) and Enterococcus spp. (30%) were the most frequently isolated bacteria. E. coli exhibited high resistance to tetracycline (74%) and ampicillin (72%) but remained susceptible to aztreonam (98%), nitrofurantoin (95%), and imipenem (93%). Enterococcus spp. were susceptible to penicillin (84%) and ampicillin (89%) but showed borderline resistance to vancomycin (53%) and linezolid (50%). Klebsiella spp. demonstrated resistance to ciprofloxacin (52%) and gentamicin (40%), whereas Salmonella spp. remained highly susceptible. Notably, resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid rose sharply from 22.2% to 81.8% (p = 0.027). Across 1416 isolates, high levels of multidrug resistance (MDR) were observed, particularly in E. coli (48.4%) and K. pneumoniae (18.6%), with notable proportions progressing toward possible Extensively Drug-Resistant (XDR) and Pan-Drug-Resistant (PDR) states. Conclusions: The findings of this study reveal rising resistance to commonly used antibiotics in the animal health sector. Despite the lack of molecular analysis, our findings underscore the urgent need for AMS programs and integrated AMR surveillance under Zambia’s One Health strategy.

Background: Zambia, like many low- and middle-income countries, faces a growing burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), driven by the misuse of antimicrobials in both human and animal health, a limited diagnostic capacity, and weak regulatory enforcement. To address this challenge, Standard Treatment Guidelines (STGs) were developed for the veterinary sector, which represents a major milestone in the country’s AMR containment strategy. STGs are evidence-based protocols that guide veterinary professionals in consistently and appropriately diagnosing and treating animal diseases. They promote the rational use of veterinary medicines, and can mitigate AMR and improve animal health outcomes. By translating the best evidence into best practices, STGs also provide a practical foundation for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs. Until 2023, Zambia lacked nationally adopted STGs for the veterinary sector. The introduction and standardization of these guidelines are expected to promote prudent antimicrobial use and raise the standard of care delivered to animal patients across the country. Objective: The aim of this paper is to provide a practical reference for future revisions of STGs and outline the successful methodology used to create STGs in the Zambian animal sector. Methods: A situational analysis was conducted to identify priority animal health conditions and existing treatment gaps within the veterinary sector. A multidisciplinary expert committee was then formed, comprising veterinarians, veterinary paraprofessionals, academics, regulatory authorities, and private sector stakeholders, to lead the development of the STGs. The process was guided by the WHO methodology for developing treatment guidelines, including a comprehensive review of the clinical evidence, local disease patterns, antimicrobial resistance data, and existing treatment practices. Draft STGs were developed with clearly defined, species-specific treatment protocols tailored to the Zambian context. For the validation process, the AGREE II instrument was used to assess the quality, clarity, and applicability of the guidelines. Structured stakeholder consultations with practitioners, policy-makers, and technical experts were held to ensure that the guidelines were practical, evidence-based, and aligned with national priorities. The validated drafts were then disseminated and piloted in selected districts. Conclusions: The development of the species-specific STGs represents an essential turning point in the country’s efforts to promote responsible veterinary care and contain AMR. STGs have become a prominent key support in the delivery of quality animal care. Further, the guidelines will assist in the optimization of antimicrobial use in animal health in Zambia.

Background/Objectives: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) play a vital role in combating antimicrobial resistance (AMR). However, their implementation in Zambia remains variable despite some notable progress. This study assessed healthcare professionals’ awareness of the Multisectoral National Action Plan (NAP) on AMR, alongside their perceptions, barriers, and implementation practices related to ASPs. Methods: A cross-sectional survey conducted between August and December 2024 included 364 healthcare professionals (HCPs) in 58 randomly selected public healthcare facilities in Zambia. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS 25.0. Results: Findings revealed that while 75.3% of respondents were aware of the Zambian NAP on AMS, only 68.1% of the respondents reported that their hospitals had established AMS committees. Conversely only 41.2% of the respondents stated that their hospitals possessed hospital-specific treatment guidelines. Encouragingly, 97.5% believed ASPs could enhance clinical outcomes and reduce AMR. Key barriers included limited funding (75.9%), inadequate IT infrastructure (64.1%), limited access to essential data (64%), and healthcare workforce shortages (53.8%). Conclusions: Whilst HCPs in Zambia demonstrated high awareness of the NAP and supported ASP implementation, systemic challenges hindered their consistent execution across health facilities. Gaps in treatment guideline development, AMR data usage, and the integration of antimicrobial susceptibility recording systems into clinical activities must be addressed to strengthen ASP efforts nationwide.

Background/Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical global health threat, with sub-Saharan Africa disproportionately affected. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs are essential in combating AMR; however, data on their implementation in resource-limited settings like Zambia remain scarce. This study assessed the post-implementation status of World Health Organization (WHO) AMS core elements in selected public hospitals in Zambia. Methods: A cross-sectional pre- and post-intervention survey was conducted in 11 public hospitals across Zambia’s 10 provinces. Baseline (pre-implementation) and 12-month follow-up (post-implementation) assessments were carried out using the WHO-adapted Periodic National and Healthcare Facility Assessment Tool. The six AMS core elements evaluated included leadership, accountability, AMS actions, education, monitoring, and feedback. Results: The average AMS program score increased from 59% at pre-implementation to 81% at post-implementation. Significant improvements were observed in education and training (+36%) and accountability (+31%). While leadership and monitoring also showed positive trends, gaps persisted in AMS actions (63%) and feedback/reporting mechanisms (68%). Drug and Therapeutics Committee (DTC) functionality improved by 23%, with 90% of facilities now holding regular DTC meetings. Implementation of AMS actions, such as ward rounds, rose from 0% to 73%. Challenges remained in clinical audit feedback, resource mobilization, and prescribing optimization. Variability across facilities highlighted differences in leadership, resources, and technical capacity. Conclusions: AMS implementation in Zambia improved substantially across key domains. However, sustained leadership, adequate financing, and continuous capacity-building are needed to address persistent gaps and ensure long-term success in mitigating AMR.