The significant physical and emotional effects of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are experienced by cancer patients. Severe symptoms decrease the patient's quality of life and potentially deters further treatment. The five main forms of CINV (i.e., acute, delayed, anticipatory, breakthrough, and refractory) require different treatment regimens, which often include 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, NK1 receptor antagonists, and corticosteroids. Despite a significant amount of research and development of antiemetic agents, management of CINV remains a great challenge with many needs waiting to be adequately addressed, such as controlling non-acute CINV, developing appropriate CINV treatment protocols for multiple-day chemotherapy patients, and providing options for those prone to CINV despite treatment. Further research is required to optimize CINV management for these patients.

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has particularly serious consequences for cancer patients, as they are at high risk for severe complications and mortality due to the virus since cancer patients are immunocompromised. Preliminary evidence suggests that patients with hematological, and metastatic malignancies are particularly susceptible to developing severe COVID-19 illness, which leads to poor prognosis. Biomarkers including C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 may be predictors of outcome and, therefore, crucial in assessing COVID-19 illness severity in cancer patients. A patient-specific risk and benefit inventory should be completed, and expert guidelines consulted when deciding to continue or postpone therapeutic interventions. This review presents preliminary evidence of COVID-19 infection and its impact on cancer, as well as discussion of general guidelines for the treatment and management of cancer patients with COVID-19.

Heart, Eye, and Artificial Intelligence: A Review

Background: Experimental evidence in tumor-bearing mouse models shows that exposure to cool, that is, sub-thermoneutral environmental temperature is associated with a higher tumor growth rate and an immunosuppressive tumor immune microenvironment than seen at thermoneutral temperatures. However, the translational significance of these findings in humans is unclear. We hypothesized that breast cancer patients living in warmer climates will have better survival outcomes than patients living in colder climates. Methods: A retrospective population-based analysis was conducted on 270,496 stage I-III breast cancer patients, who were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) over the period from 1996 to 2017. The average annual temperature (AAT) was calculated based on city level data from the National Centers for Environmental Information. Results: A total of 270, 496 patients were analyzed. Temperature as assessed in quartiles. After adjusting for potential confounders, patients who lived in the 3rd and 4th quartile temperature regions with AAT 56.7–62.5°F (3rd quartile) and > 62.5°F (4th quartile) had a 7% increase in the OS compared to patients living at AAT < 48.5°F (1st quartile) (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90–0.95 and HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.91–0.96, respectively). For DSS, When comparing AAT quartiles, patients living with AAT in the range of 56.7–62.5°F and > 62.5°F demonstrated a 7% increase each in DSS after adjustment (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90–0.96 and HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90–0.96). Conclusions: Higher environmental temperatures are associated with significantly better OS and DSS in breast cancer patients. Future research is warranted to confirm this observation using large datasets to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and investigate novel therapeutic strategies to minimize this geographic disparity in clinical outcomes.