Francesca Romano

Dr. Francesca Romano


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 October 2022 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Roberta AngelicoRoberta Angelico
Roberta Angelico
FRFrancesca Romano
Francesca Romano
CRCamilla Riccetti
Camilla Riccetti
MPMarco Pellicciaro
Marco Pellicciaro
Luca TotiLuca Toti
Luca Toti
GTGiuseppe Tisone
Giuseppe Tisone
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are still underused in kidney transplantation (KT) due to recipients’ “frailty” and risk of postoperative complications. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of ERAS in KT during the “extended-criteria donor” era, and to identify the predictive factors of prolonged hospitalization. In 2010–2019, all patients receiving KT were included in ERAS program targeting a discharge home within 5 days of surgery. Recipient, transplant, and outcomes data were analyzed. Of 454 KT [male: 280, 63.9%; age: 57 (19–77) years], 212 (46.7%) recipients were discharged within the ERAS target (≤5 days), while 242 (53.3%) were discharged later. Patients within the ERAS target (≤5 days) had comparable recipient and transplant characteristics to those with longer hospital stays, and they had similar post-operative complications, readmission rates, and 5 year graft/patient survival. In the multivariate analysis, DGF (HR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.08–4.34, p < 0.030) and in-hospital dialysis (HR: 3.68, 95% CI: 1.73–7.85, p < 0.001) were the only predictive factors for late discharge. The ERAS approach is feasible and safe in all KT candidates, and its failure is primarily related to the postoperative graft function, rather than the recipient’s clinical status. ERAS pathways, integrated with strict collaboration with local nephrologists, allow early discharge after KT, with clinical benefits.

16 October 2015 in Expert Review of Clinical Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAntonella Diamanti
Antonella Diamanti
TCTeresa Capriati
Teresa Capriati
CBCarla Bizzarri
Carla Bizzarri
FFFrancesca Ferretti
Francesca Ferretti
MAMonica Ancinelli
Monica Ancinelli
MLMattia Locatelli
Mattia Locatelli
Celiac disease (CD) is associated with several autoimmune diseases (ADs) and, in particular, thyroid autoimmunity (TA) and Type 1 diabetes (T1D). TA and T1D are defined as 'associated conditions' to CD (conditions at increased prevalence in CD but not directly related to gluten ingestion). The diagnosis of CD may precede or follow that of TA/T1D. To date, the available evidence suggests that the common genetic background is the main factor determining the high prevalence of the association. Conversely, no conclusive findings clarify whether extrinsic gluten-related factors (age at the first introduction, concomitant breastfeeding, length of gluten exposure and gluten-free diet) may link CD to the ADs. The aim of this review is to evaluate whether genetic background alone could explain the association between CD and ADs or if gluten-related factors ought to be considered. The pathophysiological links clarifying how the gluten-related factors could predispose to ADs will also be discussed.

17 March 2020 in Updates in Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SDStefano D’ugo
Stefano D’ugo
FRFrancesca Romano
Francesca Romano
SSSimone Sibio
Simone Sibio
GBGiulia Bagaglini
Giulia Bagaglini
BSBruno Sensi
Bruno Sensi
GSGiuseppe S. Sica
Giuseppe S. Sica

4 January 2021 in Transplant Infectious Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Tommaso Maria ManziaTommaso Maria Manzia
Tommaso Maria Manzia
Roberta AngelicoRoberta Angelico
Roberta Angelico
Luca TotiLuca Toti
Luca Toti
GPGennaro Pisani
Gennaro Pisani
GVGiuseppe Vita
Giuseppe Vita
GTGiuseppe Tisone
Giuseppe Tisone
The outbreak of COVID‐19 led to a reduction in the number of organ transplant interventions in most Countries. In April 2020, at the Tor Vergata University in Rome, Italy, two patients on the waiting list for kidney transplantation (KT) declined a deceased donor's kidney offer. Therefore, between April 20 and 25, 2020, we conducted a telephone survey among our 247 KT waitlist patients. Our aim was to explore: (a) the COVID‐19 diffusion among them and (b) their current willingness to be transplanted in case of a kidney offer from a deceased donor. Two hundred and forty‐three patients participated in a phone interview. One patient had died from COVID‐19. Eighty‐five (35%) KT candidates would decline any kidney offer, in most cases until the end of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Upon a multivariate analysis, female gender (OR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.26‐4.03,P = .006), high cardiovascular risk (OR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.06‐5.08,P = .034), a waiting list time <3 years (OR = 0.375, 95% CI = 0.15‐0.95,P = .04), and the need to be transferred to another hospital for HD (OR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.10‐5.9,P = .03) were associated with such refusal. The COVID‐19 pandemic led to a fear of transplantation in a third of the KT candidates. Proactive educational webinars could be a useful tool to remove, or at least lessen, any doubts on the part of KT candidates and to avoid losing the opportunity to quit dialysis.

1 October 1996 in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LNL. Nigro
L. Nigro
CVC. Vinci
C. Vinci
FRFrancesca Romano
Francesca Romano
Roberta RussoRoberta Russo
Roberta Russo
One hundred subjects positive for anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies were tested for anti-Leishmania antibodies by the indirect immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and the direct agglutination test (DAT). Subjects were subsequently followed for two years to monitor the onset of visceral leishmaniasis. Fifteen subjects were positive for anti-Leishmania antibodies in either one or both tests. Eleven were positive only by IFAT, one only by DAT, and three by both tests. During the two-year follow-up period, nine subjects developed visceral leishmaniasis; of these, six were serologically positive, four by IFAT alone and two by both tests. The results indicate that IFAT and DAT have a similar specificity but that IFAT has a higher sensitivity and a greater diagnostic significance.

22 May 2018 in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PBPaola Sabrina Buonuomo
Paola Sabrina Buonuomo
MMMarina Macchiaiolo
Marina Macchiaiolo
GLGiovanna Leone
Giovanna Leone
PVPaola Valente
Paola Valente
GMGerarda Mastrogiorgio
Gerarda Mastrogiorgio
ABAndrea Bartuli
Andrea Bartuli
Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia is a rare life-threatening disease characterized by markedly elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations and accelerated atherosclerosis. The presence of double gene defects in the LDL-Receptor, either the same defect (homozygous) or two different LDL-raising mutations (compound heterozygotes) or other variants, identify the homozygous phenotype (HopFH). Apheresis is a procedure in which plasma is separated from red blood cells before the physical removal of LDL-C or the LDL-C is directly removed from whole blood. It is currently the treatment of choice for patients with HopFH whose LDL-C levels are not able to be reduced to target levels with conventional lipid-lowering drug therapy. The aim of this study is to report a cohort of six paediatric patients and to evaluate the long term efficacy of combined medical therapy and LDL-apheresis on LDL-C reduction. We collected data from six children with confirmed diagnosis of HopFH (two females and four males; age range at diagnosis 3–8 years, mean 6 ± 1 years) from a single clinical hospital in Italy from 2007 to 2017. Clinical manifestations and outcomes may greatly vary in children with HopFH. Medical therapy and LDL-apheresis for the severe form should be started promptly in order to prevent cardiovascular disease. Lipoprotein apheresis is a very important tool in managing patients with HopFH at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Based on our experience and the literature data, the method is feasible in very young children, efficient regarding biological results and cardiac events, and safe with minor side-effects and technical problems. We advise treating homozygous and compound heterozygous children as soon as possible.