Riccardo Beltramo

Prof. Riccardo Beltramo

Department of Management, University of Torino, 10134 Turin, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2018 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Carlo IngraoCarlo Ingrao
Carlo Ingrao
Antonio MessineoAntonio Messineo
Antonio Messineo
Riccardo BeltramoRiccardo Beltramo
Riccardo Beltramo
Tan YigitcanlarTan Yigitcanlar
Tan Yigitcanlar
GIGiuseppe Ioppolo
Giuseppe Ioppolo

1 September 2015 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMaria Beatrice Pairotti
Maria Beatrice Pairotti
ACAlessandro Cerutti
Alessandro Cerutti
FMFiorenzo Martini
Fiorenzo Martini
EVEnrica Vesce
Enrica Vesce
DPDario Padovan
Dario Padovan
Riccardo BeltramoRiccardo Beltramo
Riccardo Beltramo

26 February 2017 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Stefano DuglioStefano Duglio
Stefano Duglio
Riccardo BeltramoRiccardo Beltramo
Riccardo Beltramo
Evidence from several studies shows that small-scale sport events may have more positive repercussions for the host community than major ones in terms of both economic and social impacts. This study estimates the economic impacts on a small community derived from athletes’ expenditure at a specific small-scale sport tourism event, the Italo-Swiss mountain endurance trail CollonTrek. Even if this kind of event is considered a minor sport event, generating very limited economic activity, this study supports the hypothesis that the funds invested by the public administration are compensated for by revenue generated during the trail. In fact, according to the three analyzed scenarios (Conservative, Average and Liberal), for each euro invested by the public administration, an economic return between €17.62 and €18.92 has been estimated, and between €5.64 and €6.9 (32%–36.47%) represent the direct economic return for the local community. Furthermore, in addition to the direct economic benefits, in accordance with the feedback from a sample of participants at the event (n = 180), this kind of event has positive implications in terms of future tourism for the host valley, pointing out how this kind of tourist activities has positive repercussions in terms of economic and social sustainability.

2 January 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GDGaspare D'Amico
Gaspare D'Amico
KSKatarzyna Szopik-Depczynska
Katarzyna Szopik-Depczynska
Riccardo BeltramoRiccardo Beltramo
Riccardo Beltramo
Idiano D'AdamoIdiano D'Adamo
Idiano D'Adamo
Giuseppe IoppoloGiuseppe Ioppolo
Giuseppe Ioppolo
The smart and sustainable bioeconomy represents a comprehensive perspective, in which economic, social, environmental, and technological dimensions are considered simultaneously in the planning, monitoring, evaluating, and redefining of processes and operations. In this context of profound transformation driven by rapid urbanization and digitalization, participatory and interactive strategies and practices have become fundamental to support policymakers, entrepreneurs, and citizens in the transition towards a smart and sustainable bioeconomy. This approach is applied by numerous countries around the world in order to redefine their strategy of sustainable and technology-assisted development. Specifically, real-time monitoring stations, sensors, Internet of Things (IoT), smart grids, GPS tracking systems, and Blockchain aim to develop and strengthen the quality and efficiency of the circularity of economic, social, and environmental resources. In this sense, this study proposes a systematic review of the literature of smart and sustainable bioeconomy strategies and practices implemented worldwide in order to develop a platform capable of integrating holistically the following phases: (1) planning and stakeholder management; (2) identification of social, economic, environmental, and technological dimensions; and (3) goals. The results of this analysis emphasise an innovative and under-treated perspective, further stimulating knowledge in the theoretical and managerial debate on the smart and sustainable aspects of the bioeconomy, which mainly concern the following: (a) the proactive involvement of stakeholders in planning; (b) the improvement of efficiency and quality of economic, social, environmental, and technological flows; and (c) the reinforcement of the integration between smartness and sustainability.

29 May 2020 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alessandro BonadonnaAlessandro Bonadonna
Alessandro Bonadonna
ARAndrea Rostagno
Andrea Rostagno
Riccardo BeltramoRiccardo Beltramo
Riccardo Beltramo
Land fragmentation is a factor that limits the development of the agricultural and forestry sector, as well as the ability of operators to reach a profitable economic dimension. This phenomenon also influences the creation of activities and incomes in a negative way in marginal areas. In this context, land consolidation associations (LCA) can be a useful tool in reducing this limitation and promoting better management of the territory by improving the link between the landscape and tourism. This study aims to make a comparison between the different LCAs operating in the north-west of Italy, with a specific focus on differences and similarities amongst LCAs, highlighting each orientation towards the management of the landscape with the purpose of improving tourism development. The research used a survey method; a questionnaire was designed, and a semi-structured interview was conducted with each LCA president. Findings show that land management by LCAs allows the preservation and/or improvement of the landscape and supports the development of agricultural activities such as animal breeding. This kind of landscape-based land management increases the attractiveness of the territory in terms of tourism, stimulating the nature-oriented tourism tools. Therefore, on the one hand, the Piedmontese model supports the landscape and also allows economic and social goals to be reached by tourism solutions, and on the other hand it stimulates the improvement of the environment and the creation of chests of biodiversity.

26 August 2016 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Stefano DuglioStefano Duglio
Stefano Duglio
Riccardo BeltramoRiccardo Beltramo
Riccardo Beltramo
Sustainability is increasing in importance in relation to the competitiveness of winter tourism, particularly when considering mountain destinations. Exploring in more detail winter tourism related to ski resorts, operators are especially concerned about environmental issues caused by climate change. Therefore, they have gradually become aware of the importance of finding adequate solutions to cope with such issues as well as being able to sensitize tourists. The main goal of this paper is to analyze the different sustainable tools that can be adopted by the ski industry. In this field there appear to be two main approaches. The first line is that of sustainable labels being applied to local ski resorts; whereas the second consists in operators—such as the managers of cable cars—making use of specific labels or management systems that are environmentally oriented.