Minjie Chen

Dr. Minjie Chen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 January 2024 in Molecular Neurobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YCYing Chai
Ying Chai
YLYuemin Liu
Yuemin Liu
ZLZhiyang Liu
Zhiyang Liu
WWWenbin Wei
Wenbin Wei
YDYabing Dong
Yabing Dong
MCMinjie Chen
Minjie Chen

19 March 2020 in Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZLZhiyang Dds Liu
Zhiyang Dds Liu
QXQianyang Xie
Qianyang Xie
MCMinjie Chen
Minjie Chen
CYChi Dds Yang
Chi Dds Yang
GBGuo Dds Bai
Guo Dds Bai
The aim of this study was to find out the most appropriate method of measuring condylar height on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Traditional three-circle method, modified three-circle method and ramal plane (RP) method were used by 2 separate observers for the measurement of condylar height and long axis of condyle on TMJ MRI. Pearson correlation coefficient (PCCs), intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), paired t test and Bland–Altman analysis were applied for the comparison of CH and long axis of condyle between 2 observers. Thirty-two patients’ images were finally included in our study. Comparing the 3 methods, it was revealed that the RP method has the highest consistency among the observers, followed by the modified three-circle method, and the traditional three-circle method has the worst consistency. The RP method is preferred for measuring the condylar height on MRI. If mandible edge cannot be observed on MRI, the modified three-circle method is recommended.