Ensemble machine learning methods have been widely used for modeling landslide susceptibility, but there has been no uniform ensemble method for this problem. The main objective of this study is to compare popular ensemble machine learning-based models and apply them to landslides susceptibility mapping. The selected models include the random forest (RF), which is a typical bagging ensemble model, and three advanced boosting models, namely, adaptive boosting (AB), gradient boosting decision trees (GBDT), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). This study considers 94 landslide points and 12 affecting factors. The data are divided into a training dataset consisting of 70% of the overall data, and a validation dataset, containing the remaining 30% of the data. The models are evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and three common performance metrics: sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The results indicate that the four ensemble models have an AUC of more than 0.8, suggesting that they can appropriately and accurately predict landslide susceptibility maps. In particular, the XGBoost model achieves the best performance among all models, having a sensitivity of 92.86, specificity of 90.00, and accuracy of 91.38. Furthermore, the bagging model has a sensitivity of 89.29, specificity of 86.67, and accuracy of 87.93, and it is superior to the GBDT, which achieves a sensitivity of 86.21, specificity of 86.21, and accuracy of 86.21, and the AB, reaching a sensitivity of 82.14, specificity of 80.00, and accuracy of 81.03. The results presented in this study indicate that the advanced ensemble model, the XGBoost model, could be a promising tool for the selection of ensemble models for predicting landslide susceptibility mapping.