The role of endothelial cells in the pathophysiology of antibody-mediated rejection after renal transplantation has been widely investigated. We expand this scenario to the impact of epithelial cells on the microenvironment during rejection. Primary proximal tubular epithelial cells were stimulated via HLA class I, CD155 and CD166 based on their potential signal-transducing capacity to mediate back signaling after encounter with either T/NK cells or donor-specific antibodies. Upon crosslinking of these ligands with mAbs, PTEC secreted IL-6, CXCL1,8,10, CCL2, and sICAM-1. These proteins were also released by PTEC as consequence of a direct interaction with T/NK cells. Downmodulation of the receptor CD226 on effector cells confirmed the involvement of this receptor/ligand pair in back signaling. In vivo, CD155 and CD166 expression was detectable in proximal and distal tubuli of renal transplant biopsies, respectively. The composition of the protein microenvironment in these biopsies showed a substantial overlap with the PTEC response. Cluster and principal component analyses of the microenvironment separated unsuspicious from rejection biopsies and, furthermore, ABMR, TCMR, and borderline rejection. In conclusion, our results provide evidence that epithelial cells may contribute to the rejection process and pave the way to a better understanding of the pathomechanisms of kidney allograft rejection.

Although therapeutic options are gradually improving, the overall prognosis for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still poor. Gene therapy-based strategies are developed to complement the therapeutic armamentarium, both in early and late-stage disease. For efficient delivery of transgenes with antitumor activity, vectors demonstrating preferred tumor tropism are required. Here, we report on the natural tropism of adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotype 2 vectors for HCC. When applied intravenously in transgenic HCC mouse models, similar amounts of vectors were detected in the liver and liver tumor tissue. In contrast, transduction efficiency, as indicated by the level of transgene product, was moderate in the liver but was elevated up to 19-fold in mouse tumor tissue. Preferred transduction of HCC compared to hepatocytes was confirmed in precision-cut liver slices from human patient samples. Our mechanistic studies revealed that this preference is due to the improved intracellular processing of AAV2 vectors in HCC, resulting, for example, in nearly 4-fold more AAV vector episomes that serve as templates for gene transcription. Given this background, AAV2 vectors ought to be considered to strengthen current—or develop novel—strategies for treating HCC.

T-cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) remains a major cause of kidney transplant failure, despite being considered treatable. Its impact reflects a limited understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms and their clinical consequences. To address this, we induced acute TCMR in mouse kidney transplants and profiled molecular changes using single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq), spatial transcriptomics and immunofluorescence. Results were compared with human snRNA-seq data from TCMR and stable allografts, as well as single-cell deconvolution analysis of bulk transcriptomic data from kidney transplant biopsies. Here we show that TCMR induces injured epithelial cell states in mouse kidney allografts, particularly in proximal tubules and thick ascending limbs. Spatial transcriptomics of these injured epithelial states demonstrated heterogeneous localization, interactions with immune cells and cellular microenvironments. Cross-species analysis confirmed similar severely injured epithelial states in human samples, whose abundances correlated with transplant survival and persisted despite TCMR resolution. Collectively, our results identify epithelial injury cell states as a determinant of outcome after TCMR.

Immunocompromised patients are at risk of chronic hepatitis E (HEV) infection. Recurrent T-cell and borderline rejections in a pediatric patient with high HEV copy numbers led us to study HEV infection within renal transplants. To investigate frequency of renal HEV infection in transplanted patients, 15 samples from patients with contemporaneous diagnosis of HEV-infection were identified at our center. Ten samples had sufficient residual paraffin tissue for immunofluorescence (IF) and fluorescence-in-situ-hybridization (RNA-FISH). The biopsy of the pediatric index patient was additionally sufficient for tissue-PCR and electron microscopy. HEV virus RNA was detected in paraffin tissue of index patient by tissue-PCR. Subsequently, HEV infection was localized in tubular epithelial cells by immunofluorescence, RNA-FISH and electron microscopy. One additional biopsy from an adult was positive for HEV by RNA-FISH and IF. Focal IF positivity for HEV peptide was observed in seven additional allografts. Ribavirin therapy was not successful in pediatric index patient: after relapse rivavirin is still administered. In the second patient successful elimination of HEV was achieved after short-course ribavirin therapy. HEV infection is an important differential diagnosis for T-cell rejection within transplanted kidneys. Immunostaining of HEV peptide does not necessarily prove acute infection. RNA-FISH seems to be a reliable method to localize HEV.

Calciphylaxis is a serious complication in patients with chronic kidney disease associated mineral and bone disorder. It can occur in conditions with low and high bone turnover. So far, there are no definite diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines which may prevent the devastating outcome in many calciphylaxis patients. We report a case which clearly illustrates that knowledge of the underlying bone disorder is essential for a directed treatment. Based on this experience we discuss a systematic diagnostic and therapeutic approach in patients with calciphylaxis. We report a patient with severe calciphylaxis. Initial evaluation showed an elevated serum parathormone concentration and a bone-specific alkaline phosphatase activity in the upper normal range; however, the bone biopsy clearly showed adynamic bone disease. Extended dialysis with low calcium dialysate concentration and citrate anticoagulation, and administration of teriparatide led to a further increase in bone-specific alkaline phosphatase activity and most importantly, resulted in an activated bone turnover as confirmed by a second bone biopsy 11 weeks later. This case illustrates that laboratory tests cannot reliably differentiate between high and low bone turnover in calciphylaxis patients. More importantly, this case highlights the fact that specific therapies that alter bone metabolism cannot be applied without knowledge of the bone status. On this background, we suggest that bone biopsies should be an integral part in the diagnosis and therapeutic decision in these patients and should be evaluated in further studies.