Jonny Blaker

Dr. Jonny Blaker

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2006 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KRKurosch Rezwan
Kurosch Rezwan
QCQ.Z. Chen
Q.Z. Chen
JBJonny Blaker
Jonny Blaker
ABAldo Roberto Boccaccini
Aldo Roberto Boccaccini

1 January 2011 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BDB. Deepa
B. Deepa
EAEldho Abraham
Eldho Abraham
BCBibin Mathew Cherian
Bibin Mathew Cherian
ABAlexander Bismarck
Alexander Bismarck
JBJonny Blaker
Jonny Blaker
MKMuniasamy Kottaisamy
Muniasamy Kottaisamy

1 June 2018 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BTBiranche Tandon
Biranche Tandon
JBJonny Blaker
Jonny Blaker
SCsarah cartmell
sarah cartmell

1 May 2005 in Expert Review of Medical Devices
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAldo R Boccaccini
Aldo R Boccaccini
JBJonny Blaker
Jonny Blaker
Synthetic bioactive and bioresorbable composite materials are becoming increasingly important as scaffolds for tissue engineering. Next-generation biomaterials should combine bioactive and bioresorbable properties to activate in vivo mechanisms of tissue regeneration, stimulating the body to heal itself and leading to replacement of the scaffold by the regenerating tissue. Certain bioactive ceramics such as tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite as well as bioactive glasses, such as 45S5 Bioglass, react with physiologic fluids to form tenacious bonds with hard (and in some cases soft) tissue. However, these bioactive materials are relatively stiff, brittle and difficult to form into complex shapes. Conversely, synthetic bioresorbable polymers are easily fabricated into complex structures, yet they are too weak to meet the demands of surgery and the in vivo physiologic environment. Composites of tailored physical, biologic and mechanical properties as well as predictable degradation behavior can be produced combining bioresorbable polymers and bioactive inorganic phases. This review covers recent international research presenting the state-of-the-art development of these composite systems in terms of material constituents, fabrication technologies, structural and bioactive properties, as well as in vitro and in vivo characteristics for applications in tissue engineering and tissue regeneration. These materials may represent the effective optimal solution for tailored tissue engineering scaffolds, making tissue engineering a realistic clinical alternative in the near future.

7 December 2016 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WWWeiguang Wang
Weiguang Wang
GCGuilherme Caetano
Guilherme Caetano
WAWilliam Stephen Ambler
William Stephen Ambler
JBJonny Blaker
Jonny Blaker
MFMaria Lucia Frade
Maria Lucia Frade
Paulo BartoloPaulo Bartolo
Paulo Bartolo
Scaffolds are physical substrates for cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation, ultimately leading to the regeneration of tissues. They must be designed according to specific biomechanical requirements, i.e., certain standards in terms of mechanical properties, surface characteristics, porosity, degradability, and biocompatibility. The optimal design of a scaffold for a specific tissue strongly depends on both materials and manufacturing processes, as well as surface treatment. Polymeric scaffolds reinforced with electro-active particles could play a key role in tissue engineering by modulating cell proliferation and differentiation. This paper investigates the use of an extrusion-based additive manufacturing system to produce poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL)/pristine graphene scaffolds for bone tissue applications and the influence of chemical surface modification on their biological behaviour. Scaffolds with the same architecture but different concentrations of pristine graphene were evaluated from surface property and biological points of view. Results show that the addition of pristine graphene had a positive impact on cell viability and proliferation, and that surface modification leads to improved cell response.

1 March 2004 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJonny Blaker
Jonny Blaker
SNS.N. Nazhat
S.N. Nazhat
ABA.R. Boccaccini
A.R. Boccaccini