Background: Accurate assessment of thyroid cartilage invasion in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the larynx remains a challenge in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of non-ossified thyroid cartilage invasion in patients with SCC. Methods: CEUS, CECT, and MRI scans of 27 male patients with histologically proven SCC were evaluated and compared. A total of 31 cases were assessed via CEUS and CECT. The MR images of five patients and six cases were excluded (one patient had two suspected sites), leaving twenty-five cases for analysis via MRI. Results: CEUS showed the highest accuracy and specificity compared with CECT and MRI (87.1% vs. 64.5% and 76.0% as well as 84.0% vs. 64.0% and 72.7%, respectively). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of CEUS and MRI were the same (100%). CEUS yielded four false-positive findings. However, there were no statistically significant differences among the imaging modalities (p > 0.05). Conclusions: CEUS showed better diagnostic performance than CECT and MRI. Therefore, CEUS has the potential to accurately assess non-ossified thyroid cartilage invasion and guide appropriate treatment decisions, hopefully leading to improved patient outcomes.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) time–intensity curve (TIC) parameters in detecting non-ossified thyroid cartilage invasion in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods: A CEUS TIC analysis was performed on 32 cases from 27 patients with histologically confirmed laryngeal SCC. The diagnostic performance of time to peak (TTP), peak intensity (PI), wash-in slope (WIS), area under the curve (AUC), and their quantitative differences (∆TTP, ∆PI, ∆WIS, and ∆AUC) to discriminate between the invaded and the non-invaded non-ossified thyroid cartilage was determined using ROC analysis. A logistic regression analysis was employed to identify significant predictors. Results: In an ROC analysis, of all TIC parameters analyzed separately, ∆TTP showed the greatest diagnostic performance (AUC: 0.85). A ∆TTP cut-off of ≤ 8.9 s differentiated between the invaded and the non-invaded non-ossified thyroid cartilage with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 76.9%, and accuracy of 81.3%. A combination of ∆TTP and PI increased the AUC to 0.93, specificity to 100%, and accuracy to 96.8%, but reduced the sensitivity to 83.3%. Meanwhile, the visual assessment of enhancement on CEUS to detect cartilage invasion had 83.3% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity. In a univariate logistic regression, only ∆TTP was a significant predictor of non-ossified thyroid cartilage invasion (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.64–1.00). For every second increase in ∆TTP, the probability of thyroid cartilage invasion decreased by 20%. Conclusions: CEUS TIC parameters, particularly a combination of ∆TTP and PI, showed high diagnostic performance in the detection of non-ossified thyroid cartilage invasion in laryngeal SCC.