Abhinav Khanna

Dr. Abhinav Khanna


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 July 2024 in Patient Safety in Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EDEkamjit S. Deol
Ekamjit S. Deol
GHGrant Henning
Grant Henning
SBSpyridon Basourakos
Spyridon Basourakos
RVRanveer M. S. Vasdev
Ranveer M. S. Vasdev
VSVidit Sharma
Vidit Sharma
AKAbhinav Khanna
Abhinav Khanna
Background: Retained surgical items (RSI) are preventable events that pose a significant risk to patient safety. Current strategies for preventing RSIs rely heavily on manual instrument counting methods, which are prone to human error. This study evaluates the feasibility and performance of a deep learning-based computer vision model for automated surgical tool detection and counting. Methods: A novel dataset of 1,004 images containing 13,213 surgical tools across 11 categories was developed. The dataset was split into training, validation, and test sets at a 60:20:20 ratio. An artificial intelligence (AI) model was trained on the dataset, and the model’s performance was evaluated using standard object detection metrics, including precision and recall. To simulate a real-world surgical setting, model performance was also evaluated in a dynamic surgical video of instruments being moved in real-time. Results: The model demonstrated high precision (98.5%) and recall (99.9%) in distinguishing surgical tools from the background. It also exhibited excellent performance in differentiating between various surgical tools, with precision ranging from 94.0 to 100% and recall ranging from 97.1 to 100% across 11 tool categories. The model maintained strong performance on a subset of test images containing overlapping tools (precision range: 89.6–100%, and recall range 97.2–98.2%). In a real-time surgical video analysis, the model maintained a correct surgical tool count in all non-transition frames, with a median inference speed of 40.4 frames per second (interquartile range: 4.9). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that using a deep learning-based computer vision model for automated surgical tool detection and counting is feasible. The model’s high precision and real-time inference capabilities highlight its potential to serve as an AI safeguard to potentially improve patient safety and reduce manual burden on surgical staff. Further validation in clinical settings is warranted.

16 April 2025 in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAbhinav Khanna
Abhinav Khanna
TWTamir Wolf
Tamir Wolf
IFIgor Frank
Igor Frank
AKAlexander Krueger
Alexander Krueger
PSParas Shah
Paras Shah
MTMatthew K Tollefson
Matthew K Tollefson
BACKGROUND: The creation of operative reports is a tedious documentation task that increases administrative burden, which is a potential driver of burnout. Additionally, operative reports are inherently subjective and may contain inaccuracies and incomplete information. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) technology have enabled computer vision systems to accurately detect operative steps on surgical video. We aim to develop a platform for the automated creation of video-based AI surgical operative reports in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. STUDY DESIGN: An AI computer vision algorithm was used to automatically detect surgical steps. Each step detected on video was mapped to prespecified text, which was then compiled into a narrative AI operative report. The accuracy of the AI operative reports was compared with operative reports written by surgeons, using expert review of raw surgical video footage as the ground truth. RESULTS: A total of 158 cases from a tertiary referral center were included. In surgeon operative reports, 84 cases (53.2%) had at least 1 discrepancy between the operative report and surgical video. Of these, 43 cases (27.2%) had a clinically significant discrepancy based on expert video review. In AI operative reports, 46 cases (29.1%) had at least 1 discrepancy between the operative report and surgical video. Of these, 20 cases (12.7%) had a clinically significant discrepancy. Overall accuracy was higher for AI operative reports compared with surgeon operative reports (87.3% vs 72.8%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Operative reports created by AI achieved higher accuracy than those written by surgeons. To our knowledge, this is the first report of automated video-based AI surgical documentation. Future studies are warranted to explore the potential for this novel tool to reduce documentation burden, improve operative report accuracy, promote surgical transparency, and decrease subjectivity in surgical documentation.

9 January 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAbrar Mian
Abrar Mian
MTMatthew K. Tollefson
Matthew K. Tollefson
PSParas Shah
Paras Shah
VSVidit Sharma
Vidit Sharma
AMAhmed Mian
Ahmed Mian
AKAbhinav Khanna
Abhinav Khanna
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become the leading approach for radical prostatectomy driven by innovations aimed at improving functional and oncological outcomes. The initial advancement in this field was transperitoneal multiport robotics, which has since undergone numerous technical modifications. These enhancements include the development of extraperitoneal, transperineal, and transvesical approaches to radical prostatectomy, greatly facilitated by the advent of the Single Port (SP) robot. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of these evolving techniques and their impact on RARP. Additionally, we explore the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in digitizing robotic prostatectomy. AI advancements, particularly in automated surgical video analysis using computer vision technology, are unprecedented in their scope. These developments hold the potential to revolutionize surgeon feedback and assessment and transform surgical documentation, and they could lay the groundwork for real-time AI decision support during surgical procedures in the future. Furthermore, we discuss future robotic platforms and their potential to further enhance the field of RARP. Overall, the field of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer has been an incubator of innovation over the last two decades. This review focuses on some recent developments in robotic prostatectomy, provides an overview of the next frontier in AI innovation during prostate cancer surgery, and highlights novel robotic platforms that may play an increasing role in prostate cancer surgery in the future.

28 August 2024 in Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EDEkamjit S. Deol
Ekamjit S. Deol
VSVidit Sharma
Vidit Sharma
AFAnthony E. Fadel
Anthony E. Fadel
RVRanveer Vasdev
Ranveer Vasdev
GHGrant Henning
Grant Henning
AKAbhinav Khanna
Abhinav Khanna

26 May 2025 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDaniel S. Roberson
Daniel S. Roberson
VSVidit Sharma
Vidit Sharma
SBStephen A. Boorjian
Stephen A. Boorjian
MMMatthew T. McLeay
Matthew T. McLeay
GRGiuseppe Reitano
Giuseppe Reitano
AKAbhinav Khanna
Abhinav Khanna

7 March 2024 in Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EDEkamjit S. Deol
Ekamjit S. Deol
MTMatthew K. Tollefson
Matthew K. Tollefson
AAAlenka Antolin
Alenka Antolin
MZMaya Zohar
Maya Zohar
OBOmri Bar
Omri Bar
AKAbhinav Khanna
Abhinav Khanna
Objective: Automated surgical step recognition (SSR) using AI has been a catalyst in the “digitization” of surgery. However, progress has been limited to laparoscopy, with relatively few SSR tools in endoscopic surgery. This study aimed to create a SSR model for transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT), leveraging a novel application of transfer learning to reduce video dataset requirements.Materials and methods: Retrospective surgical videos of TURBT were manually annotated with the following steps of surgery: primary endoscopic evaluation, resection of bladder tumor, and surface coagulation. Manually annotated videos were then utilized to train a novel AI computer vision algorithm to perform automated video annotation of TURBT surgical video, utilizing a transfer-learning technique to pre-train on laparoscopic procedures. Accuracy of AI SSR was determined by comparison to human annotations as the reference standard.Results: A total of 300 full-length TURBT videos (median 23.96 min; IQR 14.13–41.31 min) were manually annotated with sequential steps of surgery. One hundred and seventy-nine videos served as a training dataset for algorithm development, 44 for internal validation, and 77 as a separate test cohort for evaluating algorithm accuracy. Overall accuracy of AI video analysis was 89.6%. Model accuracy was highest for the primary endoscopic evaluation step (98.2%) and lowest for the surface coagulation step (82.7%).Conclusion: We developed a fully automated computer vision algorithm for high-accuracy annotation of TURBT surgical videos. This represents the first application of transfer-learning from laparoscopy-based computer vision models into surgical endoscopy, demonstrating the promise of this approach in adapting to new procedure types.