Katrin E. Giel

Prof. Dr. Katrin E. Giel

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Tübingen, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2015 in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ELElisabeth J. Leehr
Elisabeth J. Leehr
KKKerstin Krohmer
Kerstin Krohmer
KSKathrin Schag
Kathrin Schag
TDThomas Dresler
Thomas Dresler
Stephan ZipfelStephan Zipfel
Stephan Zipfel
KGKatrin E. Giel
Katrin E. Giel

17 March 2022 in Nature Reviews Disease Primers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KGKatrin E. Giel
Katrin E. Giel
CBCynthia Bulik
Cynthia Bulik
Fernando Fernández-ArandaFernando Fernández-Aranda
Fernando Fernández-Aranda
PHPhillipa Hay
Phillipa Hay
AKAnna Keski-Rahkonen
Anna Keski-Rahkonen
SZStephan Zipfel
Stephan Zipfel

27 October 2017 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KGKatrin E. Giel
Katrin E. Giel
MTMartin Teufel
Martin Teufel
FJFlorian Junne
Florian Junne
Stephan ZipfelStephan Zipfel
Stephan Zipfel
KSKathrin Schag
Kathrin Schag
The specific eating pattern of Binge Eating Disorder (BED) patients has provoked the assumption that BED might represent a phenotype within the obesity spectrum that is characterized by increased impulsivity. Following the guidelines of the PRISMA statement (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses), we here provide a systematic update on the evidence on food-related impulsivity in obese individuals, with and without BED, as well as normal-weight individuals. We separately analyzed potential group differences in the impulsivity components of reward sensitivity and rash-spontaneous behavior. Our search resulted in twenty experimental studies with high methodological quality. The synthesis of the latest evidence consolidates conclusions drawn in our initial systematic review that BED represents a distinct phenotype within the obesity spectrum that is characterized by increased impulsivity. Rash-spontaneous behavior in general, and specifically towards food, is increased in BED, while food-specific reward sensitivity is also increased in obese individuals without BED, but potentially to a lesser degree. A major next step for research entails the investigation of sub-domains and temporal components of inhibitory control in BED and obesity. Based on the evidence of impaired inhibitory control in BED, affected patients might profit from interventions that address impulsive behavior.

15 February 2016 in International Journal of Eating Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KGKatrin E. Giel
Katrin E. Giel
AHAnne Hermann‐Werner
Anne Hermann‐Werner
JMJochen Mayer
Jochen Mayer
KDKatharina Diehl
Katharina Diehl
SSSven Schneider
Sven Schneider
FGfor the GOAL study group
for the GOAL study group

1 January 2010 in Obesity Facts
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KGKatrin E. Giel
Katrin E. Giel
ATAnsgar Thiel
Ansgar Thiel
MTMartin Teufel
Martin Teufel
JMJochen Mayer
Jochen Mayer
Stephan ZipfelStephan Zipfel
Stephan Zipfel
Background: Studies have repeatedly demonstrated the influence of physical appearance on behavior and treatment of individuals in work settings. A high proportion of obese individuals in the USA have reported perceived discrimination in the work place due to their body weight. The present review examines the specific kind, context and extent of a weight bias in work settings. Methods: We performed a literature search in the scientific databases PubMed and PsychINFO to identify studies which have investigated aspects of a potential weight bias in the occupational context. Results: There is evidence from self-report data, surveys, and laboratory research for a weight bias in five aspects of work life. Evidence shows that obesity is a general barrier to employment, certain professions and professional success. Obese individuals are at higher risk of encountering stereotypes concerning their work-related qualities and for general unequal treatment in the work place. Conclusion: Current evidence reveals a weight bias in several areas in the work place. The ecological validity of results is limited due to the predominant reliance on laboratory studies with student samples. Field studies are needed to examine weightbased discrimination in actual work environments as well as to uncover underlying mechanisms.

11 February 2011 in International Journal of Eating Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KGKatrin E. Giel
Katrin E. Giel
MTMartin Teufel
Martin Teufel
HFHans‐Christoph Friederich
Hans‐Christoph Friederich
MHMartin Hautzinger
Martin Hautzinger
PEPaul Enck
Paul Enck
Stephan ZipfelStephan Zipfel
Stephan Zipfel