Hai Trieu Phan

Dr. Hai Trieu Phan


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 December 2022 in Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSimone Braccio
Simone Braccio
NGNathan Guillou
Nathan Guillou
NPNolwenn Le Pierrès
Nolwenn Le Pierrès
NTNicolas Tauveron
Nicolas Tauveron
HPHai Trieu Phan
Hai Trieu Phan

1 October 2020 in Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NVN. Voeltzel
N. Voeltzel
HPHai Trieu Phan
Hai Trieu Phan
QBQuentin Blondel
Quentin Blondel
Begoña González LandínBegoña González Landín
Begoña González Landín
NTNicolas Tauveron
Nicolas Tauveron

12 January 2024 in Thermo
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HCHugues Charton
Hugues Charton
CPChristian Perret
Christian Perret
HPHai Trieu Phan
Hai Trieu Phan
In this work, different CFD models to compute flows inside a steam ejector were investigated. The results were compared to the analytical models as well as the experimental results from the literature. All the simulations gave realistic results from the hydrodynamic perspective with a relative error of the entrainment ratio between 25% and 40% compared to reference experimental data. However, an analysis of the temperature profiles showed that only realistic results from the thermodynamic perspective were given by multiphase calculations. The first multiphase model tested was the so-called Wet-Steam model from ANSYS Fluent. This model gave inconsistent results for the steam ejector CFD simulation due to the physical boundaries of this model. The second model tested was the Eulerian mixture model, which gave the most realistic results in terms of the physical conditions of the liquid and vapor phases inside the ejector. It also showed that the phase change could have a significant impact on the value of the critical output pressure as a way to improve the performance of the ejector.

20 June 2023 in Applied Thermal Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSimone Braccio
Simone Braccio
NPNolwenn Le Pierrès
Nolwenn Le Pierrès
NTNicolas Tauveron
Nicolas Tauveron
BCBertrand Chandez
Bertrand Chandez
HPHai Trieu Phan
Hai Trieu Phan

23 January 2026 in Applied Thermal Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VLVu-Hai La
Vu-Hai La
BMBenoît Michel
Benoît Michel
RRRemi Revellin
Remi Revellin
HPHai Trieu Phan
Hai Trieu Phan

1 January 2023 in AIP Conference Proceedings
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
FAFabio Aste
Fabio Aste
HPHai Trieu Phan
Hai Trieu Phan
Solar Heat for Industrial Processes (SHIP) is a growing-interest concept in the context of the reduction of both energy consumption and greenhouse gases emissions. As industry often needs cooling power at negative temperatures, solar-fuelled NH3/H2O absorption systems can be employed for this task. In the context of the FriendSHIP European project, different innovative solutions are investigated for cooling production at -20°C and -40°C from 100-250°C solar heat. The first proposition concerns a GAX (Generator-Absorber heat eXchange) cycle based on Plate Heat Exchangers (PHE). This innovative design improves heat and mass transfers, thus performance. In addition, manufacturing costs decrease, as the needed components are standardized and available in the market. Two variants are simulated on EES (Engineer Equation Solver) for -20°C and -40°C cooling production. Other absorption cycles are modified to fit PHEs, in particular the pressure-staged cycle, the vapour-exchange cycle and the Semi-GAX cycle. They all are two-stage cycles and are simulated for -40°C cooling production only. The numerical comparison allows identifying the best solutions for the SHIP integration, giving an overview on the operating temperature ranges for each cycle. In particular, the following results are obtained. At ambient temperature TAMB = 20°C and below, the GAX cycle is the most performing one. It shows a maximum Coefficient of Performance (COP) of 0.53 for a cold production TE,OUT = -20°C (+27% compared to the single-stage cycle), and a COP of 0.36 at TE,OUT = -40°C (+60% than the single-stage cycle). For TAMB > 30°C, the pressure-staged cycle with GAX is the preferable one, as it can be operated with COP>0.15 at TAMB up to 50°C. The Semi-GAX cycle seems the most adapted to operation at low heat source temperature, being able to operate down to 80°C with COP>0.20.