Breast milk transfer of first-line ART from mother to infant is not fully understood. To determine the concentrations of lamivudine, emtricitabine and tenofovir in maternal blood, breast milk and infant blood from breastfeeding mother–infant pairs. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling of maternal dried blood spots (DBS), dried breast milk spots (DBMS) and infant DBS from 30 Ugandan and 29 Nigerian mothers receiving first-line ART and their infants was conducted. DBS and DBMS were collected pre-dose and at 5–6 timepoints up to 12 h following observed dosing. Infant DBS were sampled twice during this period. Lamivudine, emtricitabine and tenofovir were quantified using LC-MS/MS, with non-compartmental analysis to calculate key pharmacokinetic parameters. Peak concentrations in breast milk from women taking lamivudine and emtricitabine occurred later than in plasma (4–8 h compared with 2 h for lamivudine and 2–4 h for emtricitabine). Consequently, the milk-to-plasma (M:P) ratio of lamivudine taken once daily was 0.95 (0.82–1.15) for AUC_0–12, whereas for AUC_12–20 this was 3.04 (2.87–4.16). Lamivudine was detectable in 36% (14/39) of infants [median 17.7 (16.3–22.7) ng/mL]. For 200 mg of emtricitabine once daily, the median M:P ratio was 3.01 (2.06–3.38). Three infants (19%) had measurable emtricitabine [median 18.5 (17.6–20.8) ng/mL]. For 300 mg of tenofovir once daily, the median M:P ratio was 0.015 (0–0.03) and no infant had measurable tenofovir concentrations. Emtricitabine and lamivudine accumulate in breast milk and were detected in breastfeeding infants. In contrast, tenofovir penetrates the breast milk to a small degree, but is undetectable in breastfeeding infants.

Aims: Using a model‐based approach, the efavirenz steady‐state pharmacokinetics in African children is characterized, quantifying demographic and genotypic effects on the drug's disposition. Simulations are also conducted allowing prediction of optimized doses of efavirenz in this population.Methods: We modelled the steady‐state population pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in Ugandan and Zambian children using nonlinear mixed‐effects modelling. Individual mid‐dose efavirenz concentrations were derived and simulations explored genotype‐based dose optimization strategies.Results: A two‐compartment model with absorption through transit compartments well described 2086 concentration‐time points in 169 children. The combined effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) 516G>T and 983T>C explained 44.5% and 14.7% of the variability in efavirenz clearance and bioavailability, respectively. The detected frequencies of composite CYP2B6 genotype were 0.33 for 516GG|983TT, 0.35 for 516GT|983TT, 0.06 for 516GG|983TC, 0.18 for 516TT|983TT, 0.07 516GT|983TC and 0.01 for 516GG|983CC. The corresponding estimated clearance rates were 6.94, 4.90, 3.93, 1.92, 1.36, and 0.74 l h⁻¹ for a 15.4 kg child and median (95% CI) observed mid‐dose concentrations 1.55 (0.51–2.94), 2.20 (0.97–4.40), 2.03 (1.19–4.53), 7.55 (2.40–14.74), 7.79 (3.66–24.59) and 18.22 (11.84–22.76) mg l⁻¹, respectively. Simulations showed that wild‐type individuals had exposures at the bottom of therapeutic range, while slower metabolizers were overexposed.Conclusions: Dosage guidelines for African children should take into consideration the combined effect of SNPs CYP2B6 516G>T and 983T>C.

Background. The antiretroviral drug efavirenz is widely used during breastfeeding. Evaluating its safety requires an understanding of its breast milk pharmacokinetics, level of breastfed infants' exposure, and potential influence of polymorphisms in drug disposition genes. Methods. For this observational study, we investigated plasma and breast milk pharmacokinetics of efavirenz and breastfed infants' exposure in human immunodeficiency virus positive nursing mothers and their breastfed infants. We also evaluated potential variability due to genetic polymorphisms in CYP2B6, NR1I3, CYP2A6, ABCB1, ABCB5, and ABCG2. Results. CYP2B6 516G>T was independently associated with efavirenz concentrations in maternal plasma, breast milk, and infant plasma (n = 134). When stratified based on CYP2B6 516G>T (n = 29 ; 11 GG, 10 GT and 8 TT), efavirenz pharmacokinetic parameters in plasma and breast milk differed significantly between patient groups. The median time-averaged milk-to-plasma concentration ratio was 1.10 (range: 0.57–1.71). The estimated maximum infant efavirenz dose from breast milk was 809 µg/kg/day (215–2760) and pediatric dose weight-adjusted exposure index was 4.05% (1.08–13.8). Infant plasma concentrations did not change significantly during the dosing interval, 157 ng/mL (28.6–1360) in pooled analysis and 315 ng/mL (108–1360) in CYP2B6 516TT group. Infant plasma concentrations were highest up to 8 days of age at 1590 ng/mL (190–4631) and decreased by about 90% in the age stratum day 9 to 3 months. No efavirenz related toxicity was reported. Conclusions. Most breastfed infants are exposed to <10% of the weight-adjusted therapeutic pediatric dose, the safety threshold for exposure to maternal drugs from breast milk.

This manuscript describes the development, validation and clinical application of a novel method for the quantification of the antiretroviral drug efavirenz in dried breast milk spots using LC-MS. Dried breast milk spots were prepared by spotting 30 μL of human breast milk on each circle of Whatman 903 Protein Saver cards. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a reverse-phase C18 column with 1 mM ammonium acetate in water/acetonitrile using a solvent gradient at a flow rate of 400 μL/min and detection was by TSQ Quantum Access triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with a heated electrospray ionization source. The method was applied to characterize the breast milk pharmacokinetic profile of efavirenz in HIV-positive nursing mothers receiving regimens containing 600 mg of efavirenz once daily. The assay was validated over the concentration range 50–7500 ng/mL. Accuracy ranged between 95.2% and 102.5% and precision ranged between 1.05% and 9.53%. The average recovery of efavirenz from dried breast milk spots was 106.4% and the matrix effect was 8.14%. Stability of efavirenz in dried breast milk spots and processed samples at room temperature, −40°C and −80°C was demonstrated. In the pharmacokinetic study, the mean (SD) AUC_0–24, C_max and C_min of efavirenz in breast milk were 59 620 ng·h/mL (17 440), 4527 ng/mL (1767) and 1261 ng/mL (755.9), respectively. The mean (range) milk-to-plasma concentration ratio over the dosing interval was 0.78 (0.57–1.26). The dried breast milk spot method is simple, robust, accurate and precise, and can be used in settings with limited resources.

Purpose: To treat malaria, HIV-infected patients normally receive artemether (80 mg twice daily) concurrently with antiretroviral therapy and drug-drug interactions can potentially occur. Artemether is a substrate of CYP3A4 and CYP2B6, antiretrovirals such as efavirenz induce these enzymes and have the potential to reduce artemether pharmacokinetic exposure. The aim of this study was to develop anin vitro in vivoextrapolation (IVIVE) approach to model the interaction between efavirenz and artemether. Artemether dose adjustments were then simulated in order to predict optimal dosing in co-infected patients and inform future interaction study design.Methods: In vitrodata describing the chemical properties, absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of efavirenz and artemether were obtained from published literature and included in a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (PBPK) to predict drug disposition simulating virtual clinical trials. Administration of efavirenz and artemether, alone or in combination, were simulated to mirror previous clinical studies and facilitate validation of the model and realistic interpretation of the simulation. Efavirenz (600 mg once daily) was administered to 50 virtual subjects for 14 days. This was followed by concomitant administration of artemether (80 mg eight hourly) for the first two doses and 80 mg (twice daily) for another two days.Results: Simulated pharmacokinetics and the drug-drug interaction were in concordance with available clinical data. Efavirenz induced first pass metabolism and hepatic clearance, reducing artemether C_maxby 60% and AUC by 80%. Dose increases of artemether, to correct for the interaction, were simulated and a dose of 240 mg was predicted to be sufficient to overcome the interaction and allow therapeutic plasma concentrations of artemether.Conclusions: The model presented here provides a rational platform to inform the design for a clinical drug interaction study that may save time and resource while the optimal dose is determined empirically. Wider application of IVIVE could help researchers gain a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underpinning variability in drug disposition.