Objective: Cochlear implant impedances are influenced by the intracochlear position of the electrodes. Herein, we present an intuitive approach to calculate tissue resistances from transimpedance recordings, ultimately enabling to estimate the insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes. Methods: Electrode positions were measured in computed-tomography images of 20 subjects implanted with the same lateral wall cochlear implant model. The tissue resistances were estimated from intraoperative telemetry data using bivariate spline extrapolation from the transimpedance recordings. Using a phenomenological model, the electrode insertion depths were estimated. Results: The proposed method enabled the linear insertion depth of all electrodes to be estimated with an average error of 0.76 ± 0.53 mm. Conclusion: Intraoperative telemetry recordings correlate with the linear and angular depth of electrode insertion, enabling estimations with an accuracy that can be useful for clinical applications. Significance: The proposed method can be used to objectively assess surgical outcomes during and after cochlear implantation based on non-invasive and readily available telemetry recordings.

Objective: The insertion of the electrode array is a critical step in cochlear implantation. Herein we comprehensively investigate the impact of the alignment angle and feed-forward speed on deep insertions in artificial scala tympani models with accurate macro-anatomy and controlled frictional properties. Methods: Motorized insertions (n=1033) were performed in six scala tympani models with varying speeds and alignment angles. We evaluated reaction forces and micrographs of the insertion process and developed a mathematical model to estimate the normal force distribution along the electrode arrays. Results: Insertions parallel to the cochlear base significantly reduce insertion energies and lead to smoother array movement. Non-constant insertion speeds allow to reduce insertion forces for a fixed total insertion time compared to a constant feed rate. Conclusion: In cochlear implantation, smoothness and peak forces can be reduced with alignment angles parallel to the scala tympani centerline and with non-constant feed-forward speed profiles. Significance: Our results may help to provide clinical guidelines and improve surgical tools for manual and automated cochlear implantation.

Electrode array insertion into the inner ear is a critical step in cochlear implantation, and artificial scala tympani models can be a valuable tool for studying the dynamics of this process. This technical note describes the fabrication of electrode array dummies and scala tympani models that address shortcomings of previously published cochlear models. In particular, we improve the reproduction of frictional properties with an easy-to-apply polymer brush coating that creates hydrophilic surfaces, and produce geometries with accurate macro-anatomy based on microtomographic scans. The presented methods rely only on commonly available materials and tools and are based on publicly available data. Our validation shows very good agreement of insertion forces both in terms of linear insertion depth and insertion speed compared to previously published measurements of insertions in cadaveric temporal bones.

Purpose: As an increasing number of cochlear implant candidates exhibit residual inner ear function, hearing preservation strategies during implant insertion are gaining importance. Manual implantation is known to induce traumatic force and pressure peaks. In this study, we use a validated in-vitro model to comprehensively evaluate a novel surgical tool that addresses these challenges through motorized movement of a forceps. Methods: Using lateral wall electrodes, we examined two subgroups of insertions: 30 insertions were performed manually by experienced surgeons, and another 30 insertions were conducted with a robot-assisted system under the same surgeons’ supervision. We utilized a realistic, validated model of the temporal bone. This model accurately reproduces intracochlear frictional conditions and allows for the synchronous recording of forces on intracochlear structures, intracochlear pressure, and the position and deformation of the electrode array within the scala tympani. Results: We identified a significant reduction in force variation during robot-assisted insertions compared to the conventional procedure, with average values of 12 mN/s and 32 mN/s, respectively. Robotic assistance was also associated with a significant reduction of strong pressure peaks and a 17 dB reduction in intracochlear pressure levels. Furthermore, our study highlights that the release of the insertion tool represents a critical phase requiring surgical training. Conclusion: Robotic assistance demonstrated more consistent insertion speeds compared to manual techniques. Its use can significantly reduce factors associated with intracochlear trauma, highlighting its potential for improved hearing preservation. Finally, the system does not mitigate the impact of subsequent surgical steps like electrode cable routing and cochlear access sealing, pointing to areas in need of further research.

Objective: In conventional cochlear implantation, the insertion of the electrode array is strongly affected by the local anatomy and human kinematics. Herein, we present a concept for an insertion tool that allows to optimize the insertion trajectory beyond anatomical constraints and stabilizes the electrode array in manual implantation. A novel sleeve-based design allows the instrument to be compliant and potentially protective to intracochlear structures, while a tear-open mechanism allows it to be removed after insertion by simply retracting the tool. Methods: Conventional and tool-guided manual insertions were performed by expert cochlear implant surgeons in an analog temporal bone model that allows to simultaneously record intracochlear pressure, insertion forces and electrode array deformation. Results: Comparison between conventional and tool-guided insertions demonstrate a substantial reduction of maximum insertion forces, force variations, transverse intracochlear electrode array movement, and pressure transients. Conclusion: The presented tool can be utilized in manual cochlear implantation and significantly improves key metrics associated with intracochlear trauma. Significance: The instrument may ultimately help improve hearing outcomes in cochlear implantation. The versatile design may be used in both manual cochlear implantation and motorized and robotic insertion, as well as image-guided surgery.

Objective: Limitations in human kinematics during cochlear implantation induce pressure transients and increased forces on intracochlear structures. Herein, we present a novel head-mounted surgical tool designed for the motorized insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays. The tool integrates a force measurement feature to overcome the lack of haptic feedback in current robotic solutions. Methods: Utilizing a prototype device, we compare force measurements with those exerted on intracochlear structures in a realistic temporal bone model. Furthermore, we test the tool on six temporal bone specimens in a surgical setting to assess its performance in various anatomies. Results: Force measurements exhibit good agreement with intracochlear forces, offering significantly improved resolution over manual, tactile sensing. Successful electrode array insertions in six cadaver specimens affirmed the feasibility of tool setup, motorized insertion and tool removal in different anatomies. Conclusion: The tool allows the robot-assisted insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays and offers valuable insights during the surgical procedure, demonstrating promise for application in clinical contexts. Significance: This instrument has the potential to aid surgeons in achieving atraumatic placement of electrodes, consequently contributing to the improvement of hearing outcomes in cochlear implantation.