Hui Liu

Dr. Hui Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 April 2018 in Journal of Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CXChunlei Xia
Chunlei Xia
LFLongwen Fu
Longwen Fu
ZLZuoyi Liu
Zuoyi Liu
HLHui Liu
Hui Liu
Lingxin ChenLingxin Chen
Lingxin Chen
YLYuedan Liu
Yuedan Liu
Video tracking based biological early warning system achieved a great progress with advanced computer vision and machine learning methods. Ability of video tracking of multiple biological organisms has been largely improved in recent years. Video based behavioral monitoring has become a common tool for acquiring quantified behavioral data for aquatic risk assessment. Investigation of behavioral responses under chemical and environmental stress has been boosted by rapidly developed machine learning and artificial intelligence. In this paper, we introduce the fundamental of video tracking and present the pioneer works in precise tracking of a group of individuals in 2D and 3D space. Technical and practical issues suffered in video tracking are explained. Subsequently, the toxic analysis based on fish behavioral data is summarized. Frequently used computational methods and machine learning are explained with their applications in aquatic toxicity detection and abnormal pattern analysis. Finally, advantages of recent developed deep learning approach in toxic prediction are presented.

20 December 2018 in Journal of Oceanology and Limnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YZYe Zhao
Ye Zhao
QWQing Wang
Qing Wang
HLHui Liu
Hui Liu
BLBingjun Li
Bingjun Li
HZHongxia Zhang
Hongxia Zhang

11 May 2022 in Frontiers in Marine Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RZRongliang Zhang
Rongliang Zhang
QZQianqian Zhang
Qianqian Zhang
JZJianmin Zhao
Jianmin Zhao
ZWZhongxin Wu
Zhongxin Wu
HLHui Liu
Hui Liu
JZJiangning Zeng
Jiangning Zeng
The comparison of trophic structure and energy flow between natural and artificial reefs is imperative to evaluate whether these man-made structures work similarly to comparable natural reefs. Here, to characterize the potential difference in functioning between two types of reef ecosystems, two trophic models (Ecopath) at an artificial reef and an adjacent natural reef on the coast of the north Yellow Sea, China, were established. Both Ecopath models were divided into 18 functional groups from primary producers (algae and phytoplankton) and detritus to predatory species (e.g., Sebastes schlegelii). Model outputs showed that the ecosystem scale was smaller in the artificial reef (total system throughput (TPP) = 6,455.47 t·km−2·year−1) relative to its natural counterpart (TPP = 9,490.48 t·km−2·year−1). At both reef types, a large proportion of energy occurred at trophic levels I and II, and most of the primary production was utilized through a detritus pathway. This result implies a bottom-up energy flow control for both cases. However, two types of reef systems were behaving in a reasonable manner, as mean transfer efficiencies were similar to the Lindeman efficiency (10%). The ecosystem maturity of the artificial reef is not comparable to that of the natural reef for its inferior value of total primary production/total respiration (TPP/TR). Moreover, both the connectance index (CI) and system omnivory index (SOI) were slightly higher at the artificial reef relative to the natural reef as well as other coastal systems with parallel latitudes, suggesting that the current artificial system has formed complicated interspecies relations and high-level stability. This work updates our knowledge about the functioning evolvement of established artificial reefs and provides a baseline for the efficient management of coastal zones and further investigations.