Research links high blood pressure variability (BPV) with stroke and cerebrovascular disease, however, its association with cognition remains unclear. Moreover, it remains uncertain which BP-derived parameter (ie, variability or mean) holds more significance in understanding vascular contributions to cognitive impairment. We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Scopus and performed a meta-analysis of studies that quantified the association between resting BPV with dementia or cognitive impairment in adults. Two authors independently reviewed all titles, abstracts, and full-texts and extracted data, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Study quality was assessed using the (modified) Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A multilevel meta-analysis was used, which included effect sizes for both BPV and mean BP, with a combined end point of dementia or cognitive impairment as primary outcome. In the primary analysis, 54 effect sizes were extracted from 20 studies, with a total analytical sample of n=7 899 697. Higher systolic BPV (odds ratio [OR], 1.25 [95% CI, 1.16–1.35]), mean systolic pressure (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02–1.29]), diastolic BPV (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.12–1.29]), and mean diastolic pressure (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.04–1.29]) were associated with dementia and cognitive impairment. A direct comparison showed that mean BP effect sizes were less strong than BPV effect sizes (OR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87–0.97], P <0.01), indicating that the relative contribution of BPV exceeded that of mean BP. Methodological and statistical heterogeneity was high. Secondary analyses were less consistent as to whether BPV and mean BP were differentially associated with dementia subtypes and cognitive domains. Future studies are required to investigate BPV as a target for dementia prevention.

Background: In older age, the benefits of antihypertensive treatment (AHT) become less evident, with greater associated risk. Of particular concern is compromising cerebral blood flow (CBF), especially in those with cognitive impairment. Methods: We created a synthesis of the published evidence by searching multiple electronic databases from 1970 to May 2021. Included studies had participants with mean age ≥50 years, hypertension or cognitive impairment, and assessed CBF before and after initiating AHT. Two authors independently determined eligibility and extracted data. Study quality was assessed using The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool. We summarized study characteristics (qualitative synthesis) and performed random-effects meta-analyses (quantitative synthesis). Results: Thirty-two studies (total n=1306) were included, of which 23 were eligible for meta-analysis. In line with the qualitative synthesis, the meta-analysis indicated no effect of AHT initiation on CBF (standardized mean difference, 0.08 [95% CI, −0.07 to 0.22]; P =0.31, I ² =42%). This was consistent across subgroups of acute versus chronic AHT, drug class, study design, and CBF measurement. Subgroups by age demonstrated an increase in CBF after AHT in those aged >70 years (standardized mean difference, 4.15 [95% CI, 0.16–8.15]; P =0.04, I ² =42%), but not in those aged 50 to 65 and 65 to 70 years (standardized mean difference, 0.18 [95% CI,−2.02 to 2.38]; P =0.87, I ² =49%; standardized mean difference, 1.22 [95% CI, −0.45 to 2.88]; P =0.15, I ² =68%). Overall, risk of bias was moderate-to-high and quality of evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was very low, reflecting the observational nature of the data. Conclusions: Accepting the observed limitations, current evidence does not suggest a harmful effect of AHT on CBF. Concerns over CBF should not preclude treatment of hypertension.

The effects of tyrosine on plasma response and cognition in aging are unknown. We assessed the dose-dependent response to tyrosine administration in older adults in both plasma tyrosine concentrations and working memory performance. In this double blind randomized cross-over trial 17 older adults (aged 60–75 years) received a single administration of 100, 150, or 200 mg/kg body weight of tyrosine. For comparison, 17 young adults (aged 18–35 years) received a dose of 150 mg/kg body weight of tyrosine. Tyrosine plasma concentrations were determined before and 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, and 240 min after tyrosine intake. Working memory was assessed using the N-back task at 90 min after tyrosine administration. Older adults showed a dose-dependent increase in plasma tyrosine concentrations (p < 0.001), and the plasma response was higher than for young adults with the same dose (p < 0.001). Load-dependent working memory performance decreased with higher doses of tyrosine (p = 0.048), especially in older adults with greater dose-dependent plasma tyrosine responses (p = 0.035). Our results show an age-related increase in plasma tyrosine response, which was associated with a dose-dependent decline in cognitive functioning in older adults.

Background: Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is common in older adults with hypertension. Antihypertensive treatment (AHT) prevents cardio- and cerebrovascular events. However, physicians are concerned to cause OH, making them hesitant to initiate or augment AHT in older adults with hypertension. Methods: We systematically researched electronic databases for trials with older participants (>= 65 years) with hypertension and OH assessment after initiating, discontinuing, or augmenting AHT. Study quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analyses on OH prevalence and postural blood pressure (BP) drop were performed. Results: Twenty-five studies (26,695 participants) met inclusion criteria, of which fifteen could be included in the meta-analyses. OH prevalence decreased after AHT initiation or augmentation (risk ratio 0.39 (95 % CI = 0.21-0.72; I-2 = 47 %; p < 0.01), n = 6 studies), but also after AHT discontinuation (risk ratio 0.39 (95 % CI = 0.28-0.55; I-2 = 0 %; p < 0.01), n = 2 studies). Postural BP drop did not change after initiation or augmentation of AHT (mean difference 1.07 (95 % CI = -0.49-2.64; I-2 = 92 %; p = 0.18), n = 11 studies). The main reason for ten studies not to be included in the meta-analyses was absence of baseline OH data. Most of these studies reported OH incidences between 0 and 2 %. Studies were heterogeneous in OH assessment methods (postural change, timing of BP measurements, and OH definition). Risk of bias was moderate to serious in twenty studies. Conclusion: Results suggest that AHT initiation or augmentation decreases OH prevalence, implying that the risk of inducing OH may be overestimated in current AHT decision-making in older adults. However, the overall low level of evidence and the finding that AHT discontinuation reduces OH prevalence limit firm conclusions at present and highlight an important research gap. Future AHT trials in older adults should measure OH in a standardized protocol, adhering to consensus guidelines to overcome these limitations.