PURPOSE: Hematologic toxic effects of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) can be permanent. Patients with underlying clonal hematopoiesis (CH) may be more inclined to develop hematologic toxicity after PRRT. However, this association remains understudied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated pre- and post-PRRT blood samples of patients with neuroendocrine tumors. After initial screening, 13 cases of interest were selected. Serial blood samples were obtained on 4 of 13 patients. Genomic DNA was analyzed using a 100-gene panel. A variant allele frequency cutoff of 1% was used to call CH. RESULT: Sixty-two percent of patients had CH at baseline. Persistent cytopenias were noted in 64% (7 of 11) of the patients. Serial sample analysis demonstrated that PRRT exposure resulted in clonal expansion of mutant DNA damage response genes ( TP53, CHEK2, and PPM1D) and accompanying cytopenias in 75% (3 of 4) of the patients. One patient who had a normal baseline hemogram and developed persistent cytopenias after PRRT exposure showed expansion of mutant PPM1D (variant allele frequency increased to 20% after exposure from < 1% at baseline). In the other two patients, expansion of mutant TP53, CHEK2, and PPM1D clones was also noted along with cytopenia development. CONCLUSION: The shifts in hematopoietic clonal dynamics in our study were accompanied by emergence and persistence of cytopenias. These cytopenias likely represent premalignant state, as PPM1D-, CHEK2-, and TP53-mutant clones by themselves carry a high risk for transformation to therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Future studies should consider CH screening and longitudinal monitoring as a key risk mitigation strategy for patients with neuroendocrine tumors receiving PRRT.

There has been a widespread adoption of hypomethylating agents (HMA: 5-Azacytidine (5-Aza)/decitabine) and venetoclax (Ven) for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, the mechanisms behind the combination’s synergy are poorly understood. Monotherapy often encounters resistance, leading to suboptimal outcomes; however, the combination of HMA and Ven has demonstrated substantial improvements in treatment responses. This study elucidates multiple synergistic pathways contributing to this enhanced therapeutic effect. Key mechanisms include HMA-mediated downregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins, notably MCL-1, and the priming of cells for Ven through the induction of genes encoding pro-apoptotic proteins such as Noxa. Moreover, Ven induces sensitization to HMA, induces overcoming resistance by inhibiting the DHODH enzyme, and disrupts antioxidant pathways (Nrf2) induced by HMA. The combination further disrupts oxidative phosphorylation in leukemia stem cells, amplifying the therapeutic impact. Remarkably, clinical studies have revealed a favorable response, particularly in patients harboring specific mutations, such as IDH1/2, NPM1, CEBPA, or ASXL1. This prompts future studies to explore the nuanced underpinnings of these synergistic mechanisms in AML patients with these molecular signatures.

The intricate interplay between Clonal Hematopoiesis (CH) and the repercussions of cancer therapies has garnered significant research focus in recent years. Previously perceived as an age-related phenomenon, CH is now closely linked to inflammation ("Inflammaging") and cancer, impacting leukemogenesis, cancer progression, and treatment responses. This review explores the complex interplay between CH and diverse cancer therapies, including chemotherapy, targeted treatments, radiation, stem cell transplants, CAR-T cell therapy, and immunotherapy, like immune checkpoint inhibitors. Notably, knowledge about post-chemotherapy CH mutation/acquisition has evolved from a de novo incident to more of a clonal selection process. Chemotherapy and radiation exposure, whether therapeutic or environmental, increases CH risk, particularly in genes like TP53 and PPM1D. Environmental toxins, especially in high-risk environments like post-disaster sites or space exploration, are associated with CH. CH affects clinical outcomes in stem cell transplant scenarios, including engraftment, survival, and t-MN development. The presence of CH also alters CAR-T cell therapy responses and impacts the efficacy and toxicity of immunotherapies. Furthermore, specific mutations like DNMT3A and TET2 thrive under inflammatory stress, influencing therapy outcomes and justifying the ongoing tailored interventions in clinical trials. This review underscores the critical need to integrate CH analysis into personalized medicine, enhancing risk assessments and refining treatment strategies. As we progress, multidisciplinary collaboration and comprehensive studies are imperative. Understanding CH's impact, especially concerning genotoxic stressors, will inform screening, surveillance, and early detection strategies, decreasing the risk of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms and revolutionizing cancer treatment paradigms.

This cohort study compares the risks of developing different hematologic cancers in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with glucagon-like peptide–1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) compared with metformin and insulin.

Introduction: Hypomethylating agents (HMA) have played a pivotal role for treating myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) over the past decade, inducing sustained hematological responses and delaying progression to leukemia. However, a vast majority of patients will experience treatment failure within 2 years, with poor prognoses and limited options, and management of this growing patient population remains unclear. Areas covered: With the introduction of new agents in the MDS field, a better understanding of the biology of MDS, and updated information on standard of care options (including allogeneic transplantation), we re-evaluate the global treatment strategy in MDS via novel agents, focusing in particular on investigational approaches for patients who fail to respond to HMA when applicable. This review aims to address two questions: what are reasonable alternatives to HMA in MDS, and what strategies can be used for patients experiencing HMA failure. Expert opinion/commentary: HMA therapy remains a mainstay of treatment, even if additional research is still warranted to maximize its benefits for the different groups of patients. The outcome of patients experiencing HMA failure remains grim, without standard of care, but several new approaches seem promising, as there is an increasing focus on studying treatments for patients refractory to HMA treatment.