David R. Horton

Dr. David R. Horton


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 September 2023 in Annals of the Entomological Society of America
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Stefano CivolaniStefano Civolani
Stefano Civolani
VSVictoria Soroker
Victoria Soroker
WCW Rodney Cooper
W Rodney Cooper
DHDavid R. Horton
David R. Horton
The pear psyllids (Cacopsylla Ossiannilsson; Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Psyllidae) are a taxonomically difficult group of at least 24 species native to the Palaearctic region. One or more species occur in most pear-growing regions, in some cases as invasive introductions. Existing reviews of this group are primarily of taxonomic focus with limited overviews of biology. The earliest biological studies of the pear psyllids centered on a core group of a few western European species. In part, this focus arose because diversity of the pear psyllids was poorly understood. As taxonomic understanding has advanced over the last 3 decades, research has expanded taxonomically. Increasing difficulties in controlling the pear psyllids additionally has contributed to growth in research. Here, we review a now-extensive literature on diversity, biology, and management of the pear psyllids. Three broad observations emerged from this synthesis. First, large gaps in biological understanding of the pear psyllids persist for several geographic faunas, most notably for psyllids of the Eastern Palaearctic region. Second, taxonomic diversity is accompanied by biological diversity. Despite the commonality in host use among the pear psyllids, with each species being limited to development on Pyrus, striking differences exist among species in life cycles, wintering, and other biological traits. Third, many of the tools being used to manage pear psyllids today are in existence because of the long history of basic research which has targeted these pests. These tools include new insecticides of higher selectivity, various cultural and horticultural tactics, and practices that conserve natural enemies in orchards.

19 June 2020 in Journal of Economic Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KWKatie Wentz
Katie Wentz
WCW Rodney Cooper
W Rodney Cooper
DHDavid R. Horton
David R. Horton
RKRobert Kao
Robert Kao
LNLouis B Nottingham
Louis B Nottingham
Erythritol is a dietary sweetener that is used for low-calorie or diabetic diets. Although safe for human consumption, erythritol is lethal to certain Dipteran pests, but insecticidal effects of erythritol on phloem-feeding insects have yet to be examined. Our goal was to determine whether erythritol has insecticidal activity against pear psylla, Cacopsylla pyricola (Foerster) (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). We first demonstrated that ingestion of erythritol solutions compared with water by pear psylla caused reduced feeding, impaired motor functions, and reduced survival time of adults. We then tested whether foliar treatment of pear leaves with erythritol was also lethal to pear psylla. Foliar treatment of erythritol led to reduced 3-d survival of pear psylla nymphs and adults, and reduced rates of oviposition by pear psylla adults. Psylla adults also preferred to settle on untreated leaves than on erythritol-treated leaves in preference assays. Finally, we conducted field experiments to test whether applications of erythritol provided pear trees with protection against pear psylla under natural field conditions. Those experiments showed a reduction in pear psylla nymphs on erythritol-treated trees compared with untreated trees, but only if the erythritol was completely dissolved into solution by heating. Laboratory trials confirmed the importance of heating. Results of our experiments demonstrate that erythritol is insecticidal to pear psylla nymphs and adults and provide the first report that erythritol is lethal to a phloem-feeding insect. These findings suggest that erythritol may provide a new safe and effective tool for the management of pear psylla.

1 February 1990 in The Canadian Entomologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DHDavid R. Horton
David R. Horton
JCJohn L. Capinera
John L. Capinera
A non-pest population of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), was monitored in the field and in the laboratory to define some cultural and host plant factors that might prompt increased use of potato by a population locally adapted to a wild host species (Solanum sarrachoides Sendt.). This study tested whether elimination of the beetle’s natural host from plots of potato would result in increased densities of beetles on potato, and examined whether beetles showed differences in performance on and in preference for S. sarrachoides or potato. In 2 years of study, egg densities on potato were higher in weed-free than weedy plots; paired preference tests in the laboratory also indicated that beetles deposited the most egg masses (92%) on S. sarrachoides. Densities of larvae and adults on potato were not affected by weed density. Growth rates of larvae were significantly faster on S. sarrachoides than on potato for both early-season (pre 7 July) and late-season (post 21 July) foliage. Survival and adult size were not affected by host species. In choice tests, late-instar larvae preferred S. sarrachoides to potato. Host preference of larvae varied with age of foliage, and S. sarrachoides became increasingly preferred later in the growing season.

6 January 2024 in Insects
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DHDavid R. Horton
David R. Horton
The pear psyllids (Cacopsylla spp.; Psylloidea) comprise ~24 species of sap-feeding insects distributed in Europe, temperate Asia, and (as introductions) in the Americas. These pear-specialized insects are among the most damaging and difficult to control pests in orchards. Biological control increasingly is being used to replace or partially replace insecticidal management of pear psyllids. Many key natural enemies of pear psyllids regularly occur in non-orchard habitats on native plants. The presence of beneficial species both in orchard and non-orchard habitats (here referred to as “spillover”) has prompted suggestions that native plants and their associated psyllids should be conserved as alternative resources for natural enemies of pear psyllids. The expectation is that the natural enemies will move from those habitats into psyllid-infested orchards. This review shows that psyllids in native habitats are important resources for several key predators and parasitoids of pear psyllids. These resources are critical enough that some beneficials exhibit an almost nomadic existence as they move between plant species, tracking the seasonal appearance and disappearance of psyllid species. In contrast, other natural enemies show minimal or no spillover between orchard and non-orchard habitats, which likely is evidence that they exhibit limited movement at best between orchard and non-orchard habitats. To show conclusively that spillover also indicates that a beneficial species disperses between native habitats and orchards requires difficult research on insect movement. This review concludes with a brief discussion of these difficulties and possible solutions.

3 October 2015 in Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WCW. Rodney Cooper
W. Rodney Cooper
DHDavid R. Horton
David R. Horton

28 April 2021 in Annals of the Entomological Society of America
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DHDavid R. Horton
David R. Horton
EMEugene Miliczky
Eugene Miliczky
TWTimothy D Waters
Timothy D Waters
DBDaniel Burckhardt
Daniel Burckhardt
SHSusan E Halbert
Susan E Halbert
The Psylloidea (Hemiptera) comprise ~4,000 species of small sap-feeding insects known as psyllids or jumping plant-lice. We summarize species composition of the nonnative psyllid fauna in North America and review detection records, current distributions, host use, life histories, and geographical sources. Forty-six species are considered to be nonnative accounting for ~10% of the known North American psyllid fauna. The family Psyllidae is overrepresented in the pool of exotics (52% of exotic species) relative to global psyllid diversity, whereas Triozidae (at 11% of exotic species) is underrepresented. Records of initial detection range from the 1832 detection of a European pear psyllid to the 2016 detection of a Ficus specialist from Asia. Many species exhibit discontinuous distributions in North America presumably caused by multiple introductions or by secondary spread of established populations. Host plants of nonnative species are almost exclusively trees and shrubs. The factor most correlated with introduction is presence of hosts from the psyllid’s native region. Virtually all host plants in North America have been imported intentionally for human-related use, with initial importation beginning in the 1500s and 1600s. Arrival of host plants in North America often preceded psyllid detection or arrival by decades or centuries. There has been almost no spillover by psyllids onto native plant species reflecting the narrow host range of Psylloidea. A glaring exception is the recent damaging colonization of a native Fraxinus closely related to the psyllid’s European Fraxinus host. Biological and geographical traits correlated with arrival and establishment of nonnative psyllids have shifted through time. Temperate Europe was the source of the earliest arriving species, with initial detection records primarily in New England and eastern Canada. In contrast, recent arrivals are mostly Myrtaceae- and Fabaceae-feeding species from the Neotropics or Australia, with detection records limited mostly to Florida or California. Early-arriving, temperate zone species exhibit a formal winter diapause while recent arrivals from the Neotropics and Australia appear to reproduce more-or-less continuously.