Opinion statement: Improvements in systemic therapy in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have improved patient outcomes and reduced the incidence of CNS relapse. However, management of patients with CNS disease remains challenging, and relapses in the CNS can be difficult to salvage. In addition to treatment with CNS-penetrant systemic therapy (high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine), intrathecal prophylaxis is indicated in all patients with ALL, however is not uniformly administered in patients with AML without high-risk features. There is a limited role for radiation treatment in CNS prophylaxis; however, radiation should be considered for consolidative treatment in patients with CNS disease, or as an option for palliation of symptoms. Re-examining the role of established treatment paradigms and investigating the role of radiation as bridging therapy in the era of cellular therapy, particularly in chemotherapy refractory patients, is warranted.

Despite the increasing utilization of bridging radiotherapy (Br-RT), its impact on chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) efficacy and toxicity remains poorly characterized. We retrospectively reviewed patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas (BCLs) who received Br-RT followed by CAR-T from 2018 to 2020 across 10 institutions. Br-RT toxicities were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) per American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Consensus Guidelines. One hundred seventy-two patients (168 large BCL) received Br-RT before axicabtagene ciloleucel (73%), tisagenlecleucel (24%), or brexucabtagene autoleucel (2%). At leukapheresis, most patients (74%) had advanced-stage disease and 39% had bulky disease measuring ≥10cm. Comprehensive Br-RT was administered to 39% and bridging systemic therapy to 35%. Among all patients, grade ≥3 Br-RT toxicity occurred in 2% (1 grade 5 toxicity), grade ≥3 CRS in 9%, and grade ≥3 ICANS in 24%. Median follow-up was 31.3 months. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 38% and 53%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, comprehensive Br-RT was associated with superior PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; P < .001) and OS (HR, 0.48; P = .011). Patients with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) normalization after Br-RT (high pre-Br-RT LDH, normal post-Br-RT LDH) had superior PFS and OS compared with those with high post-Br-RT LDH and similar PFS and OS compared with those with normal baseline LDH. In this particularly high-risk cohort, Br-RT before CAR-T demonstrates an acceptable toxicity profile with favorable clinical outcomes compared with historical controls. Comprehensive Br-RT and LDH normalization after Br-RT may be associated with superior PFS and OS.

Background Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is rare, with a treatment backbone that typically includes high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy, with radiation often reserved for persistent or progressive disease. In this study, we report the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with PCNSL to potentially defer whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or as salvage after WBRT. Methodology We performed a single-institution, retrospective review of 20 patients with PCNSL who received single-fraction or fractionated SRS to 32 lesions between September 1992 and July 2019. Results The median age at SRS was 67 years (interquartile range (IQR) = 56-74 years). The median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at SRS was 80 (IQR = 50-80). In total, 18 (90%) patients received methotrexate-based chemotherapy prior to SRS, with a median of eight cycles (IQR = 5-10). A total of 10 patients received SRS for recurrent disease after chemotherapy and/or WBRT, nine patients received SRS for the persistent disease after chemotherapy alone, and one patient received up-front SRS. Overall, five patients received SRS following WBRT. The median SRS dose was 16 Gy (IQR = 14-22.5 Gy) in one fraction (IQR = 1-5 fractions). Eight patients (40%) were treated with consolidative pomalidomide or lenalidomide following SRS. The local control rate was 100% (32/32 lesions at a median follow-up of 15 months). In total, 13 of 16 (81%) patients with available follow-up experienced distant brain recurrence. The median time to distant failure following SRS was 10 months (IQR = 1-16 months). Three patients received salvage SRS, and three patients received salvage WBRT. The median overall survival from diagnosis was 39 months (95% confidence interval = 24-54 months). KPS at the time of SRS was significantly correlated with time to progression (p = 0.002). The use of lenalidomide or pomalidomide after SRS was associated with improved overall survival after SRS (three vs. 14 months, p = 0.035). Consolidative etoposide and cytarabine after initial methotrexate-based chemotherapy was also associated with improved survival following SRS (eight vs. 47 months, p = 0.028). Conclusions SRS offers effective local tumor control for patients with PCNSL; however, the majority of patients experience distant progression. SRS may have a role in the salvage setting for patients with recurrence after WBRT, or allow deferral of WBRT in select patients, although systemic therapy appears to strongly influence outcomes in this cohort.

Many hospitalized children are underimmunized. We assessed the association between hospital immunization practices and tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap), meningococcal, human papillomavirus (HPV), and influenza vaccine delivery. An electronic survey regarding hospital vaccine delivery practices was distributed via the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) and Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings networks to PHIS hospitals. Number of vaccines delivered and total discharges in 2018 were obtained from the PHIS database to determine hospital vaccine delivery rates; patients 11 to 18 years old (adolescent vaccines) and 6 months to 18 years old (influenza vaccine) were included. Vaccine delivery rates were risk adjusted by using generalized linear mixed-effects modeling and compared with survey responses to determine associations between the number or presence of specific practices and vaccine delivery. Adjusted HPV and meningococcal vaccine delivery rates could not be calculated because of low delivery. Twenty-nine hospitals completed a survey (57%). 152 499 and 423 046 patient encounters were included for the adolescent and influenza vaccines, respectively. Unadjusted inpatient vaccine delivery rates varied. After adjustment, the number of practices was associated only with influenza vaccine delivery (P = .02). Visual prompts (P = .02), nurse or pharmacist ordering (P = .003), and quality improvement projects (P = .048) were associated with increased influenza vaccine delivery; nurse or pharmacist ordering had the greatest impact. No practices were associated with Tdap vaccine delivery. The number and presence of specific hospital practices may impact influenza vaccine delivery. Further research is needed to identify strategies to augment inpatient adolescent immunization.