Immunocytokines are an emerging class of antibody-cytokine fusion proteins combining the specificity of monoclonal antibodies with the potent immunostimulatory effects of cytokines, potentially enhancing the anti-tumor immune response while reducing systemic toxicity. We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines. We performed a comprehensive literature search using PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The search strategy included the terms "immunocytokine", "cytokine", "tumor", and "cancer". Filters were applied to retrieve only peer-reviewed articles and clinical trials. 25 publications were retrieved: 15 were Phase I studies; 2 Phase I/II, and 8 Phase II. Regarding ongoing clinical trials, 62 studies were included: 30 were Phase I studies, 2 Phase III, and the remaining 30 were either Phase II (n = 13) or Phase I/II (n = 17). In 50/62 trials, the primary and co-primary outcomes included safety measures, such as adverse effects, dose-limiting toxicities, and maximum tolerated dose. In both studies from literature and ongoing clinical trials, the most common target was extra-domain B (EDB) of fibronectin, and the most investigated type of cancer was melanoma. While all published studies focused on solid tumors, several ongoing trials include hematologic malignancies. Research interest in immunocytokines as a potential cancer treatment is increasing, although only limited data are currently available. Several trials, mainly in the early phase, are ongoing, paving the way for a possible broader clinical application of this class of immunotherapeutics.

Background: Linezolid standard dosing is typically applied in ICU without adjustments, even in renal impairment. This study examines serum concentration variability by renal function or CRRT administration in patients receiving 1200 mg/day of linezolid. Methods: This retrospective, single-center, non-randomized observational study was conducted at Niguarda Hospital (Milan, Italy) on data from the two-year period 2023–2024. ICU patients receiving linezolid, with a renal function determination and trough TDM performed at steady-state were included and stratified by renal function or CRRT status. Results: 54 patients were included, with 18 (33%) undergoing CRRT (CVVH). CRRT patients presented higher median linezolid concentrations (4.6 mg/L) than non-CRRT patients (3.2 mg/L), and a lower risk of underdosing (17% vs. 39%). CRRT patients showed significantly lower concentrations (4.6 mg/L vs. 10 mg/L, p = 0.007) than non-CRRT patients with renal function ≤ 30 mL/min, with fewer out-of-range levels (39% vs. 91%, p = 0.008) and overdosing (22% vs. 73%, p = 0.018). A significant inverse correlation was found between renal function and linezolid levels (Spearman’s rho = −0.61, p < 0.001), with CRRT patients exhibiting concentrations comparable to those of individuals with moderately impaired renal function. Continuous infusion resulted in significantly higher median concentrations (7.2 mg/L) than extended infusion (2.7 mg/L), with an increased risk of overdosing (47% vs. 17%; p = 0.018). Conclusions: After standard-dosing administration, linezolid levels vary widely in critically ill patients. Renal function significantly affects pharmacokinetics: severe impairment increases overdose risk, while ARC may cause underdosing. Standard-dosing appears adequate in CRRT patients, with levels similar to moderate-impairment. Continuous infusion aids target attainment in normal or ARC patients but raises overdose risk in severe impairment. TDM-based personalized dosing seems crucial to optimize therapy and reduce toxicity or failure.

Awareness related to the risk/benefit profile of therapies used in paediatric and elderly patients is limited. We carried out a study, called the MEAP 3.0 study, to collect and analyse evidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and drug–drug interactions (DDIs) that occurred in frail populations under polypharmacy in a real-world setting. Data were retrieved from reports of ADRs and pharmacological counselling from patients treated in hospitals and territorial health services. We collected 2977 ADRs reports and identified ‘anti-infectives for systemic use’ and ‘cardiovascular system’ as the most frequently implicated pharmacological classes in under-18 and over-65 patients, respectively. We detected 2179 DDIs, of which 10.7% were related to at least one ADR: 22 were classified as ‘contraindicated’ (7 in the paediatric group and 15 in the elderly one), and 61 as ‘major’ (6 in the paediatric patients and 55 in the geriatric ones), while 151 DDIs were classified as ‘moderate’ (10 referred to paediatric population, and 109 to elderly patient) and as ‘minor’ (1 in paediatric patients, and 31 in the elderly ones). The MEAP 3.0 project demonstrates that pharmacovigilance surveillance and therapeutic reconciliation are valid strategies to avoid potential DDIs and the occurrence of ADRs, allowing for personalised medicine.