Daniel Ridley-Ellis

Dr. Daniel Ridley-Ellis


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 March 2016 in European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DRDaniel Ridley-Ellis
Daniel Ridley-Ellis
PSPeter Stapel
Peter Stapel
Vanesa BañoVanesa Baño
Vanesa Baño

30 September 2013 in European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LRLauri Rautkari
Lauri Rautkari
JHJuhani Honkanen
Juhani Honkanen
CHCallum A. S. Hill
Callum A. S. Hill
DRDaniel Ridley-Ellis
Daniel Ridley-Ellis
MHMark Hughes
Mark Hughes

29 March 2013 in Annals of Forest Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JMJohn R. Moore
John R. Moore
ALAndrew J. Lyon
Andrew J. Lyon
GSGregory J. Searles
Gregory J. Searles
SLStefan A. Lehneke
Stefan A. Lehneke
DRDaniel Ridley-Ellis
Daniel Ridley-Ellis

23 June 2009 in Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJohn R. Moore
John R. Moore
SMShaun J. Mochan
Shaun J. Mochan
FBFranka Brüchert
Franka Brüchert
AHAdrian I. Hapca
Adrian I. Hapca
DRDaniel Ridley-Ellis
Daniel Ridley-Ellis
SLStephen J. Lee
Stephen J. Lee
Mechanical tests were conducted on structural timber from a 37-year-old Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr), progeny trial located in Kershope Forest, Cumbria, UK. Values of modulus of rupture (MOR) and global modulus of elasticity (MOEG) in bending and density were compared between timber cut from four of the eight different seed lots which made up the experiment. Three of these seed lots were open-pollinated progeny of selected plus trees, while the fourth consisted of trees grown from an unimproved collection imported from the Queen Charlotte Islands (QCI) in British Columbia, Canada. The progenies from the plus trees were selected for their contrasting growth rates, stem form and wood density relative to the QCI control. Overall, the timber had characteristic values for density, MOR and MOEG consistent with the requirements for the C16 strength class. A significant difference in timber basic density was observed between two of the seed lots; however, there was no difference in MOR or MOEG between any of the seed lots. Most of the variation in strength properties in the study was attributable to differences between individual trees (»40 per cent) and individual pieces of timber from within a tree (»50 per cent), with only a small amount (⪅5 per cent) due to treatment differences. Results indicate that gains in merchantable log volume that have been achieved due to tree breeding do not appear to have been offset by a reduction in the mechanical properties of timber.

19 March 2022 in International Wood Products Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DRDaniel Ridley-Ellis
Daniel Ridley-Ellis
DGDavid Gil-Moreno
David Gil-Moreno
AHAnnette Harte
Annette Harte
This paper summarises the state of the art for strength grading of construction timber grown in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. It includes the latest approvals based on recent research on spruce, larch and Douglas-fir. It lists the following information along with the primary references: visual grading grades and strength class assignments; grading machines with approved settings for machine control grading; the species, size ranges and strength class combinations covered; and grade determining properties of specific strength classes for the UK and Irish markets. This paper is useful for those grading timber, and those specifying UK and Irish grown timber.

3 April 2019 in International Wood Products Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DGDavid Gil-Moreno
David Gil-Moreno
DRDaniel Ridley-Ellis
Daniel Ridley-Ellis
AHAnnette Harte
Annette Harte
Results of the recently approved machine control grading settings for Douglas fir in the Republic of Ireland and the UK have shown that the species can be graded to C18, and higher strength classes, and while there is a relatively high proportion of low strength timber, useful yields of grades up to C35 can be achieved. Large differences were found between subsamples, but it is believed that this is not a geographical difference between Ireland and the UK, but a feature of the representative sampling, and consequence of much more localized variation in timber quality.