Tacrolimus (Tac) is a pivotal immunosuppressant agent used to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Tac is characterized by a narrow therapeutic window and a high inter-patient and intra-patient pharmacokinetic variability (IPV). Although high IPV of Tac concentrations has been associated with adverse post-transplant outcomes following solid organ transplantation, the effects of Tac IPV on alloHSCT recipients have not been determined. Tac IPV was therefore retrospectively evaluated in 128 alloHSCT recipients receiving high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and the effects of Tac IPV on the occurrence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) were analyzed. Tac IPV was calculated from pre-dose concentrations (C₀) measured during the first month after Tac initiation. The cumulative rates of grades II-IV and grades III-IV aGVHD at day +100 were 22.7% and 7%, respectively. Higher Tac IPV was associated with a greater risk of developing GVHD, with patients having IPV > 50th percentile having significantly higher rates of grades II-IV (34.9% vs. 10.8%; hazard ratio [HR] 3.858, p < 0.001) and grades III-IV (12.7% vs. 1.5%; HR 9.69, p = 0.033) aGVHD than patients having IPV ≤ 50th percentile. Similarly, patients with IPV > 75th percentile had higher rates of grades II-IV (41.9% vs. 16.5%; HR 3.30, p < 0.001) and grades III-IV (16.1% vs. 4.1%; HR 4.99, p = 0.012) aGVHD than patients with IPV ≤ 75th percentile. Multivariate analyses showed that high Tac IPV (>50th percentile) was an independent risk factor for grades II-IV (HR 2.99, p = 0.018) and grades III-IV (HR 9.12, p = 0.047) aGVHD. Determination of Tac IPV soon after alloHSCT could be useful in identifying patients at greater risk of aGVHD.

Tacrolimus (Tac) is pivotal in preventing acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). It has been reported that genetic factors, including CYP3A5*3 and CYP3A4*22 polymorphisms, have an impact on Tac metabolism, dose requirement, and response to Tac. There is limited information regarding this topic in alloHSCT. The CYP3A5 genotype and a low Tac trough concentration/dose ratio (Tac C₀/D ratio) can be used to identify fast metabolizers and predict the required Tac dose to achieve target concentrations earlier. We examined 62 Caucasian alloHSCT recipients with a fast metabolizer phenotype (C₀/dose ratio ≤ 1.5 ng/mL/mg), assessing CYP3A5 genotypes and acute GVHD incidence. Forty-nine patients (79%) were poor metabolizers (2 copies of the variant *3 allele) and 13 (21%) were CYP3A5 expressers (CYP3A5*1/*1 or CYP3A5*1/*3 genotypes). CYP3A5 expressers had lower C₀ at 48 h (3.7 vs. 6.2 ng/mL, p = 0.03) and at 7 days (8.6 vs. 11.4 ng/mL, p = 0.04) after Tac initiation, tended to take longer to reach Tac therapeutic range (11.8 vs. 8.9 days, p = 0.16), and had higher incidence of both global (92.3% vs. 38.8%, p < 0.001) and grade II-IV acute GVHD (61.5% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.008). These results support the adoption of preemptive pharmacogenetic testing to better predict individual Tac initial dose, helping to achieve the therapeutic range and reducing the risk of acute GVHD earlier.

Background: Even though venetoclax in combination with azacitidine (VenAza) is considered a low-intensity regimen, its patients present a high incidence of cytopenia and infections during the first courses, making the initial management a challenging phase. Methods: This difficulty in our center led to the establishment of an At-Home (AH) program for ramp-up and follow-up patients during the VenAza combination induction phase focused on therapy administration, patient and caregiver education, and management of adverse events (AEs). A total of 70 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML) or relapsed/refractory AML (R/R AML) were treated with VenAza from March 2019 to May 2022. We compared outcomes between patients managed with a hospital-based (inpatient) approach and those managed through the AH program. Results: Despite most patients experiencing grade 3–4 cytopenias (96.9%), the incidence of serious infections and other AEs was comparable between both groups, with no significant difference in febrile neutropenia (42.3% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.38). Overall, the AH cohort demonstrated a significantly lower hospital readmission rate after ramp-up (29.5% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.001). Moreover, the inpatient cohort’s admission days were longer than in the AH cohort (13 vs. 8, p = 0.28). Conclusions: AH management was feasible and safe, leading to better resource use, enhanced patient comfort, and improved treatment compliance. The potential of AH programs for managing low-intensity chemotherapy regimens can reduce hospital admissions and subsequently improve patient and caregiver well-being.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a relevant cause of morbimortality in patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Foscarnet (FCN) is an effective drug against CMV administered intravenously and usually on an inpatient basis. The Home Care Unit (HCU) for hematologic patients at our hospital designed an at-home FCN administration model to avoid the hospitalization of patients requiring FCN treatment. This study analyzes whether the at-home administration of FCN is as safe and effective as its hospital administration. We collected and compared demographic, clinical, analytical, and economic data of patients with CMV infection post-allo-HCT who received FCN in the hospital (n = 16, 17 episodes) vs. at-home (n = 67, 88 episodes). The proportions of patients with cured CMV infections were comparable between the two groups (65.9% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.395). The median duration of FCN treatment was 15 (interquartile range [IQR] 9–23) and 14 (IQR 11–19) days in the HCU and inpatient cohorts, respectively (p = 0.692). There were no significant differences in the FCN toxicities between groups except for hypocalcemia (26.1% vs. 58.8%, p = 0.007), which was more prevalent in the inpatient cohort. A significant cost-effectiveness was found in the HCU cohort, with a median savings per episode of EUR 5270. It may be concluded that home administration of FCN is a safe, effective, and cost-efficient therapeutic option for patients with CMV infection and disease.