Sharon A Savage

Dr. Sharon A Savage


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

40Years (1987-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 February 2009 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLisa Mirabello
Lisa Mirabello
RTRebecca J. Troisi
Rebecca J. Troisi
SSSharon A Savage
Sharon A Savage
BACKGROUND: Osteosarcoma, which is the most common primary bone tumor, occurs most frequently in adolescents, but there is a second incidence peak among individuals aged >60 years. Most osteosarcoma epidemiology studies have been embedded in large analyses of all bone tumors or focused on cases occurring in adolescence. Detailed descriptions of osteosarcoma incidence and survival with direct comparisons among patients of all ages and ethnicities are not available.METHODS: Frequency, incidence, and survival rates for 3482 patients with osteosarcoma from the National Cancer Institute's population‐based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program between 1973 and 2004 were investigated by age (ages 0‐24 years, 25‐59 years, and 60 to ≥85 years), race, sex, pathology subtype, stage, and anatomic site.RESULTS: There were large differences in incidence and survival rates by age. There was a high percentage of osteosarcoma with Paget disease and osteosarcoma as a second or later cancer among the elderly. There was a high percentage of osteosarcoma among patients with Paget disease and osteosarcoma as a second or later cancer among the elderly. Tumor site differences among age groups were noted. Survival rates varied by anatomic site and disease stage and did not improve significantly from 1984 to 2004.CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive, population‐based description of osteosarcoma, identified important differences in incidence, survival, pathologic subtype, and anatomic site among age groups, and quantified the impact of osteosarcoma in patients with Paget disease or as a second cancer on incidence and mortality rates. These findings may have implications in understanding osteosarcoma biology and epidemiology. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.

3 February 2009 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLisa Mirabello
Lisa Mirabello
RTRebecca J. Troisi
Rebecca J. Troisi
SSSharon A Savage
Sharon A Savage
Osteosarcoma incidence rates in the United States peak in adolescence and in the elderly. The international patterns of osteosarcoma incidence in children have been described, whereas those for young, middle age or elderly adults have not. Using the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, International Agency for Cancer Research database we compared incidence rates for children and adolescents (age 0–24 years), the middle age group (25–59 years) and elderly (≥60 years) persons by world regions and individual countries. Overall, worldwide osteosarcoma incidence rates were quite similar in the younger age groups. The greatest variation in incidence rates was observed in the elderly. Published 2009 UICC

6 May 2012 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KJKevin B Jacobs
Kevin B Jacobs
MYMeredith Yeager
Meredith Yeager
WZWeiyin Zhou
Weiyin Zhou
SWSholom Wacholder
Sholom Wacholder
ZWZhaoming Wang
Zhaoming Wang
SCStephen J. Chanock
Stephen J. Chanock
Luis Pérez-Jurado, Stephen Chanock and colleagues detect clonal chromosomal abnormalities in peripheral blood or buccal samples from individuals in the general population. They show that the frequency of such events increases with age and is associated with elevated risk of developing subsequent hematological cancers. In an analysis of 31,717 cancer cases and 26,136 cancer-free controls from 13 genome-wide association studies, we observed large chromosomal abnormalities in a subset of clones in DNA obtained from blood or buccal samples. We observed mosaic abnormalities, either aneuploidy or copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity, of >2 Mb in size in autosomes of 517 individuals (0.89%), with abnormal cell proportions of between 7% and 95%. In cancer-free individuals, frequency increased with age, from 0.23% under 50 years to 1.91% between 75 and 79 years (P = 4.8 × 10−8). Mosaic abnormalities were more frequent in individuals with solid tumors (0.97% versus 0.74% in cancer-free individuals; odds ratio (OR) = 1.25; P = 0.016), with stronger association with cases who had DNA collected before diagnosis or treatment (OR = 1.45; P = 0.0005). Detectable mosaicism was also more common in individuals for whom DNA was collected at least 1 year before diagnosis with leukemia compared to cancer-free individuals (OR = 35.4; P = 3.8 × 10−11). These findings underscore the time-dependent nature of somatic events in the etiology of cancer and potentially other late-onset diseases.

27 March 2013 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBStig E Bojesen
Stig E Bojesen
KPKaren A Pooley
Karen A Pooley
SJSharon E Johnatty
Sharon E Johnatty
JBJonathan Beesley
Jonathan Beesley
KMKyriaki Michailidou
Kyriaki Michailidou
ADAlison M Dunning
Alison M Dunning
Stig Bojesen, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Alison Dunning and colleagues report common variants at the TERT-CLPTM1L locus associated with mean telomere length measured in whole blood. They also identify associations at this locus to breast or ovarian cancer susceptibility and report functional studies in breast and ovarian cancer tissue and cell lines. TERT-locus SNPs and leukocyte telomere measures are reportedly associated with risks of multiple cancers. Using the Illumina custom genotyping array iCOGs, we analyzed ∼480 SNPs at the TERT locus in breast (n = 103,991), ovarian (n = 39,774) and BRCA1 mutation carrier (n = 11,705) cancer cases and controls. Leukocyte telomere measurements were also available for 53,724 participants. Most associations cluster into three independent peaks. The minor allele at the peak 1 SNP rs2736108 associates with longer telomeres (P = 5.8 × 10−7), lower risks for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative (P = 1.0 × 10−8) and BRCA1 mutation carrier (P = 1.1 × 10−5) breast cancers and altered promoter assay signal. The minor allele at the peak 2 SNP rs7705526 associates with longer telomeres (P = 2.3 × 10−14), higher risk of low-malignant-potential ovarian cancer (P = 1.3 × 10−15) and greater promoter activity. The minor alleles at the peak 3 SNPs rs10069690 and rs2242652 increase ER-negative (P = 1.2 × 10−12) and BRCA1 mutation carrier (P = 1.6 × 10−14) breast and invasive ovarian (P = 1.3 × 10−11) cancer risks but not via altered telomere length. The cancer risk alleles of rs2242652 and rs10069690, respectively, increase silencing and generate a truncated TERT splice variant.

1 November 2009 in The American Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMaria Teresa Landi
Maria Teresa Landi
NCNilanjan Chatterjee
Nilanjan Chatterjee
KYKai Yu
Kai Yu
LGLynn R. Goldin
Lynn R. Goldin
AGAlisa M. Goldstein
Alisa M. Goldstein
NCNeil E. Caporaso
Neil E. Caporaso

31 May 2017 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKChristian P. Kratz
Christian P. Kratz
MAMaria Isabel Achatz
Maria Isabel Achatz
LBLaurence Brugières
Laurence Brugières
TFThierry Frebourg
Thierry Frebourg
JGJudy E. Garber
Judy E. Garber
DMDavid Malkin
David Malkin
Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is an autosomal dominantly inherited condition caused by germline mutations of the TP53 tumor suppressor gene encoding p53, a transcription factor triggered as a protective cellular mechanism against different stressors. Loss of p53 function renders affected individuals highly susceptible to a broad range of solid and hematologic cancers. It has recently become evident that children and adults with LFS benefit from intensive surveillance aimed at early tumor detection. In October 2016, the American Association for Cancer Research held a meeting of international LFS experts to evaluate the current knowledge on LFS and propose consensus surveillance recommendations. Herein, we briefly summarize clinical and genetic aspects of this aggressive cancer predisposition syndrome. In addition, the expert panel concludes that there are sufficient existing data to recommend that all patients with LFS be offered cancer surveillance as soon as the clinical or molecular LFS diagnosis is established. Specifically, the panel recommends adoption of a modified version of the “Toronto protocol” that includes a combination of physical exams, blood tests, and imaging. The panel also recommends that further research be promoted to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of these risk-adapted surveillance and cancer prevention strategies while addressing the psychosocial needs of individuals and families with LFS. Clin Cancer Res; 23(11); e38–e45. ©2017 AACR. See all articles in the online-only CCR Pediatric Oncology Series.