The accelerating and inhibiting effects of nanoparticles on amyloid peptide aggregation are discussed for varying nanoparticle and peptide properties in the context of recent studies.

The skin secretions of Australian tree frogs are rich in peptides with potential antimicrobial activity. They interrupt bacterial cell membranes, although precisely how and whether all peptides have the same mechanism is not known. The interactions of three of these peptides-aurein 1.2, maculatin 1.1, and caerin 1.1 with supported phospholipid bilayers-are examined here using quartz crystal microbalance and atomic force microscopy. These approaches enabled us to reveal variations in material structure and density as a function of distance from the sensor surface when comparing mass sensorgrams over a range of harmonics of the natural resonance of the sensor crystal and hence obtain for the first time to our knowledge a mechanistic assessment of membrane disruption. We found that caerin inserted into the bilayer in a transmembrane manner, regardless of concentration and phospholipid composition consistent with a pore-forming mechanism. In contrast, maculatin and aurein interacted with membranes in a concentration-dependent manner. At low concentrations (<5 microM), maculatin exhibited transmembrane incorporation whereas aurein was limited to surface association. Upon reaching a threshold value of concentration, both peptides lysed the membrane. In the case of maculatin, the lysis progressed in a slow, concentration-dependent manner, forming mixed micelles, as shown by atomic force microscopy imaging. Aurein-induced lysis proceeded to a sudden disruption, which is consistent with the "carpet" mechanism. Both maculatin and aurein exhibit specificity toward phospholipids and thus have potential as candidates as antimicrobial drugs.

The function of any given biological membrane is determined largely by the specific set of integral membrane proteins embedded in it, and the peripheral membrane proteins attached to the membrane surface. The activity of these proteins, in turn, can be modulated by the phospholipid composition of the membrane. The reconstitution of membrane proteins into a model membrane allows investigation of individual features and activities of a given cell membrane component. However, the activity of membrane proteins is often difficult to sustain following reconstitution, since the composition of the model phospholipid bilayer differs from that of the native cell membrane. This review will discuss the reconstitution of membrane protein activities in four different types of model membrane — monolayers, supported lipid bilayers, liposomes and nanodiscs, comparing their advantages in membrane protein reconstitution. Variation in the surrounding model environments for these four different types of membrane layer can affect the three-dimensional structure of reconstituted proteins and may possibly lead to loss of the proteins activity. We also discuss examples where the same membrane proteins have been successfully reconstituted into two or more model membrane systems with comparison of the observed activity in each system. Understanding of the behavioral changes for proteins in model membrane systems after membrane reconstitution is often a prerequisite to protein research. It is essential to find better solutions for retaining membrane protein activities for measurement and characterization in vitro.