Background: Little is known about sex differences in the risk of type 2 diabetes (DM2) development related to body fat depot. The main aim of this study was to assess sex-specific differences in the prevalence of diabetes in the relation to body mass, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and calculated body fat percentage (BF), adjusted by physical activity, in younger and older hypertensive adults. Subjects/Methods: The survey enrolled 12,289 adult hypertensive outpatients with body weight, height, and WC reported by their physicians across Poland. Prevalence of diabetes was plotted against body mass, BMI, WC, and calculated BF and adjusted by the self-reported level of physical activity. Results: In our cohort, younger women (<60 years) with BMI < 25.0 kg/m² had lower adjusted prevalence of diabetes than corresponding men (3.4% vs. 6.5%), while among older (≥60 years) with BMI < 25.0 kg/m², the prevalence of diabetes was greater in women than in men (19.4% vs. 11.2%). A 25% probability of diabetes was observed for younger women with lower BMI than younger men (32.1 kg/m² and 35.3 kg/m², respectively) and WC (100.7 cm and 116.1 cm, respectively) but greater BF (45.5% and 38.9%, respectively). The corresponding differences in BMI and WC in older ones were much smaller (27.6 kg/m² and 27.2 kg/m², respectively; 83.7 cm and 85.6 cm, respectively), but not for BF (40.7% and 30.1%, respectively). A doubling of diabetes probability (from 25% to 50%), adjusted by physical activity, was attributable to the lower increase in BMI and WC and BF in women than in men (6.3 vs. 9.8 kg/m², 25.0 vs. 36.1 cm, and 6.5 vs. 10.8%, for younger, and 8.1 vs. 11.3 kg/m², 26.2 vs. 73.2 cm and 8.8 vs. 13.3%, for older). Conclusions: This study shows a lower probability of diabetes in younger women than younger men with normal weight BMI ranges, adjusted to physical activity. This probability is greater for hypertensive women, regardless of age, due to the increase in BMI/WC and BF values adjusted for physical activity.

Solifenacin, a selective muscarinic receptor antagonist, is one of the best-tolerated and most effective medicines that relieve storage symptoms in patients with an overactive bladder (OAB). However, the persistence of solifenacin in daily clinical practice remains far below that reported in clinical trials. This study aimed to analyze the adherence of patients to the therapy and the reasons for solifenacin discontinuation and non-regular use in OAB patients managed by urologists. Data concerning non-compliance and the discontinuation of solifenacin, along with the reasons, were collected during two consecutive visits for 64,049 OAB outpatients. Over the two visits, 81.6% of the patients continued therapy, and 88.6% were taking solifenacin regularly. An age ≥ 75 yrs., the male sex, a rural or small-city dwelling, and a prescription of ≥10 mg predicted therapy continuation. The female sex, a higher education, a short or long duration of an OAB, and a non-idiopathic OAB predicted regular use. The persistence of nycturia and urinary incontinence during therapy predicted both discontinuation and non-regular use. Dissatisfaction with therapy was the most frequent reason for discontinuation. In conclusion, an initial prescription of solifenacin at a low dose reduces the chance of OAB symptom improvement and results in more frequent discontinuation. A high rate of discontinuation related to dissatisfaction suggests unrealistic expectations for OAB patients and insufficient education by urologists.

Background: Fixed-dose combination medications (FDCs) are recognized methods of increasing adherence to polytherapy in chronic diseases. However, the role of FDCs in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) remains uncertain. We designed this study to assess persistence, adherence, and patient satisfaction with FDCs recently introduced to the Polish pharmaceutical market, which contain tamsulosin (an α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist) in combination with solifenacin (a muscarinic receptor antagonist) or dutasteride (a 5-α reductase inhibitor). Methods: The analysis included 50,435 men (67.8 ± 8.8 years old) managed by urologists for BPH-associated LUTS, who had been on combination therapies for at least 3 months. Two study visits, with an interval of 2.1 ± 1.4 months, were conducted between February and December 2024. Results: Single-component drugs (83.1%) were more common forms of therapy compared to FDCs (16.9%). ARAs (α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists) with 5-α reductase inhibitors comprised 70.2%, while ARAs with muscarinic receptor antagonists or β3-adrenergic agonists comprised 29.5%. Persistence with therapy across two visits was 82.0% for single-component drugs and 93.6% for FDCs (p < 0.001); OR = 1.31 (95% CI: 1.02–1.63). Similarly, adherence was better in patients treated with FDCs (96.6% vs. 91.0% at visit 1, p < 0.001; 99.3% vs. 97.9% at visit 2, p < 0.05). Patients prescribed FDCs were satisfied with therapy more often than those prescribed single-component drugs (62.6% and 76.8% vs. 50.6% and 67.5% at visits 1 and 2, respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusions: 1. Combination therapies are still more commonly administered as separate tablets than FDCs in patients with BPH-associated LUTS. 2. The use of FDCs increases short-term satisfaction and persistence with therapy, with a mild effect on adherence.

This prospective, observational, multicenter study assessed the tolerance of Dobenox Forte^®, the first approved over-the-counter product containing calcium dobesilate, in 1795 outpatients with chronic venous disease (CVD) in daily clinical practice. In addition, the effectiveness (decrease in circumferences of a more affected limb at the ankle and middle part of the calf, and changes in the severity of CVD signs) was assessed. No adverse events related to use of the preparation were reported in a period of 64 ± 20 days. Dobenox Forte^® use was associated with a reduction in calf circumference by 13.1 mm (95%CI: 12.2–14.1) and in ankle circumference by 9.7 mm (95%CI: 9.2–11.0) in patients reporting swelling of the lower legs (60.0% of the cohort). A reduction in calf and ankle circumference by at least 1 cm was achieved in 34.9% and 24.9% of patients, respectively. The percentages of patients reporting moderate to very severe lower limb heaviness decreased from 96.6% to 56.0%, calf cramps decreased from 91.0% to 41.0%, calf pain decreased from 89.2% to 43.7%, swelling decreased from 86.1% to 38.8%, and burning sensation that worsens when standing decreased from 79.0% to 33.7%. The medicinal product Dobenox Forte^® is well tolerated by patients and seems to effectively reduce the symptoms of CVD.

The effectiveness of a fix-dose salmeterol/fluticasone combination therapy in asthma was previously shown for the original product. The study aim was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of a second entry DPI – dry powder inhaler (Salflumix Easyhaler) in patients with asthma in everyday clinical practice. This multicenter Investigator-Initiated Study that enrolled 2,037 adult outpatients with asthma treated with Salflumix Easyhaler, was conducted by 220 pulmonologists across Poland. Asthma control was assessed during 3 visits with 6 ± 2 weeks intervals based on the Asthma Control Test (ACT). In addition, patient Satisfaction with Asthma Treatment Questionnaire (SATQ) and adherence and adverse events (AEs) were monitored. During the observation (86 ± 30 days) the percentage of patients with controlled asthma (ACT 20-25 pts) increased from 35.5% at the first visit to 86.5% at the third visit (p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, there were more patients not obtaining asthma control among patients that switched from the treatment with other devices than in naive ones. Global SATQ scores increased from 5.8 ± 0.7 to 6.2 ± 0.6 during the observation. Patients’ satisfaction with the use of the Salflumix Easyhaler was high. Adherence exceeded 95%. Eight AEs were reported. Salflumix Easyhaler is highly effective and well-tolerated by naïve patients with asthma and those switching from another device. In general, patients show good compliance with medical product and are satisfied with the use of this new device, and not reporting difficulties and errors related to its’ use. Their physicians’ overall perception of Salflumix Easyhaler use is very positive.