Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is rising worldwide, as well as in the Republic of Kazakhstan, while its occurrence is also increasing in the younger population. Hereditary forms associated with the development of colon and rectal cancer and early-onset CRC have never been studied in the population of Kazakhstan. The aim of this research was to investigate the spectrum of CRC-related gene mutations to determine which mutations cause early onset of CRC in the Kazakhstan population. Methods: The study included 125 unrelated patients from Kazakhstan (range 17–50 years in age) with early onset CRC. Genomic DNA was obtained from peripheral blood of the patients. Next-generation sequencing was performed using the TruSightCancer Kit on the MiSeq platform. The Studio Variant was used to annotate and interpret genetic variants. Results: Bioinformatics analysis of Next-generation sequencing data revealed 11,152 variants from 85 genes, of them, 3,790 missense, 6,254 synonymous variants, 44 3′UTR variants, 10 frameshift variants, five stop-gain variants, four in-frame deletions, two splice donors, one splice acceptor variant, and 1,042 intron or non-coding variants. APC, BRCA2/1, ALK, BRIP1, EGFR, FANCA, FANCD2, FANCI, HNF1A, MEN1, NSD1, PMS2, RECQL4, RET, SLX4, WRN, and XPC genes mutated most often. According to the ACMG guidelines and LOVD/ClinVar databases, 24 variants were pathogenic (10 frameshifts, five missenses, five stop-gain, one in-frame deletion, and three splice-site mutations), and 289 were VUS with population frequency <1%, 131 of them were attributed as deleterious. In the study, 50% of all pathogenic mutations found in Kazakhstani patients with early CRC onset were identified in the subgroups with a family history of CRC and primary multiple tumors. In APC, pathogenic mutations were most often (21%). Conclusion: Pathogenic and likely pathogenic mutations were found in 20 (16%) out of 125 patients. Eight novel pathogenic mutations detected in FANCI, APC, BMPR1, ATM, and DICER1 genes have not been reported in previous literature. Given the high frequency and wide spectrum of mutations, NGS analysis must be carried out in families with a history of CRC/CRC-related cancers with the purpose to identify cause-effective mutations, clarify the clinical diagnosis, and prevent the development of the disease in other family members.

Https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28518 Gulnur Zhunussova, Nazgul Omarbayeva, Dilyara Kaidarova, Saltanat Abdikerim, Natalya Mit, Ilya Kisselev, Kanagat Yergali, Aigul Zhunussova, Tatyana...

Breast cancer is a global health problem. It is an age-dependent disease, but cases of early-onset breast cancer (eBC) are gradually increasing. There are many unresolved questions regarding eBC risk factors, mechanisms of development and screening. Only 10% of eBC cases are due to mutations in the BRCA1/BRCA2 genes, and 90% have a more complex genetic background. This poses a significant challenge to timely cancer detection in young women and highlights the need for research and awareness. Therefore, identifying genetic risk factors for eBC is essential to solving these problems. This study represents an association analysis of 144 eBC cases and 163 control participants to identify genetic markers associated with eBC risks in Kazakh women. We performed a two-stage approach in association analysis to assess genetic predisposition to eBC. First-stage genome-wide association analysis revealed two risk intronic loci in the CHI3L2 gene (p = 5.2 × 10⁻⁶) and MGAT5 gene (p = 8.4 × 10⁻⁶). Second-stage exonic polymorphisms haplotype analysis showed significant risks for seven haplotypes (p < 9.4 × 10⁻⁴). These results point to the importance of studying medium- and low-penetrant genetic markers in their haplotype combinations for a detailed understanding of the role of detected genetic markers in eBC development and prediction.

Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most common oncological diseases among men. Up to 20% of PC cases are associated with hereditary risks or syndromes. The impact of common variants, particularly EHBP1 c.1185+30064G>A rs721048, on developing PC and other malignancies remains unclear. There are also no data on the frequency of this variant in the Kazakh population or its association with PC, nor its potential connection with other malignancies, particularly colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: We utilized the TruSight Cancer Sequencing Panel to assess pathological genomic variants in 72 male patients with histologically verified aggressive PC and 119 patients of Kazakh nationality with histologically confirmed CRC compared to the control group. Results: A variant in the intron of the EHBP1 gene c.1185+30064G>A rs721048 was identified in 18 patients (25%) out of 72 with PC, while in the control group of 41 healthy males, the rs721048 variant was found in only 4 (9.8%) individuals. In the CRC group, rs721048 was detected in 17 cases (14.2%) and eight control individuals (10%). Conclusions: The frequency of the EHBP1 c.1185+30064G>A rs721048 variant in the PC group was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in healthy males of Kazakh nationality. Identifying EHBP1 c.1185+30064G>A among the male population of Kazakhstan will help form the high-risk groups for PC to prevent the development of malignant neoplasms. The presence of rs721048 was not significantly associated with the risk of developing CRC in our study.

Background/Objectives: This study presents the first molecular characterization of NF1 gene variants in Kazakhstani patients, expanding regional understanding of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). The NF1 gene encodes neurofibromin, a tumor suppressor protein that regulates the MAPK signaling pathway; its inactivation results in NF1, a multisystem disorder with pigmentary and tumor manifestations. Methods: A total of 60 pediatric and young adult patients of University Clinic Aksai were selected based on Legius criteria and studied clinically; genetic variants of NF1 gene were determined with AmpliSeq for Illumina Myeloid Panel (next generation sequencing). Results: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic (with some variants of unknown significance) were detected in 58 of 60 (96.7%) patients. Among them, 27 (46.6%) carried point variants, 21 (36.2%) had genomic deletions, 3 (5.2%) had duplications, 3 (5.2%) insertions, and 4 (6.9%) had exon–intron splicing site variants. Notably, all patients with duplication insertions and splicing variants presented with plexiform neurofibromas. Conclusions: The study defines the first variant spectrum in a Kazakhstani population, confirming genotype–phenotype correlations consistent with European cohorts (l.). These data highlight the predominance of structural and splicing alterations in patients with plexiform neurofibromas and support the integration of molecular testing into clinical management of NF1 in Kazakhstan.