The Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank (RCSB PDB), the US data center for the global PDB archive and a founding member of the Worldwide Protein Data Bank partnership, serves tens of thousands of data depositors in the Americas and Oceania and makes 3D macromolecular structure data available at no charge and without restrictions to millions of RCSB.org users around the world, including >660 000 educators, students and members of the curious public using PDB101.RCSB.org. PDB data depositors include structural biologists using macromolecular crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, 3D electron microscopy and micro-electron diffraction. PDB data consumers accessing our web portals include researchers, educators and students studying fundamental biology, biomedicine, biotechnology, bioengineering and energy sciences. During the past 2 years, the research-focused RCSB PDB web portal (RCSB.org) has undergone a complete redesign, enabling improved searching with full Boolean operator logic and more facile access to PDB data integrated with >40 external biodata resources. New features and resources are described in detail using examples that showcase recently released structures of SARS-CoV-2 proteins and host cell proteins relevant to understanding and addressing the COVID-19 global pandemic.

The Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank (RCSB PDB, RCSB.org), the US Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB, wwPDB.org) data center for the global PDB archive, provides access to the PDB data via its RCSB.org research-focused web portal. We report substantial additions to the tools and visualization features available at RCSB.org, which now delivers more than 227000 experimentally determined atomic-level three-dimensional (3D) biostructures stored in the global PDB archive alongside more than 1 million Computed Structure Models (CSMs) of proteins (including models for human, model organisms, select human pathogens, crop plants and organisms important for addressing climate change). In addition to providing support for 3D structure motif searches with user-provided coordinates, new features highlighted herein include query results organized by redundancy-reduced Groups and summary pages that facilitate exploration of groups of similar proteins. Newly released programmatic tools are also described, as are enhanced training opportunities.

Analyses of publicly available structural data reveal interesting insights into the impact of the three‐dimensional (3D) structures of protein targets important for discovery of new drugs (e.g., G‐protein‐coupled receptors, voltage‐gated ion channels, ligand‐gated ion channels, transporters, and E3 ubiquitin ligases). The Protein Data Bank (PDB) archive currently holds > 155,000 atomic‐level 3D structures of biomolecules experimentally determined using crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and electron microscopy. The PDB was established in 1971 as the first open‐access, digital‐data resource in biology, and is now managed by the Worldwide PDB partnership (wwPDB; wwPDB.org). US PDB operations are the responsibility of the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics PDB (RCSB PDB). The RCSB PDB serves millions of RCSB.org users worldwide by delivering PDB data integrated with ∼40 external biodata resources, providing rich structural views of fundamental biology, biomedicine, and energy sciences. Recently published work showed that the PDB archival holdings facilitated discovery of ∼90% of the 210 new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration 2010–2016. We review user‐driven development of RCSB PDB services, examine growth of the PDB archive in terms of size and complexity, and present examples and opportunities for structure‐guided drug discovery for challenging targets (e.g., integral membrane proteins).

Motivation: Tools for pairwise alignments between 3D structures of proteins are of fundamental importance for structural biology and bioinformatics, enabling visual exploration of evolutionary and functional relationships. However, the absence of a user-friendly, browser-based tool for creating alignments and visualizing them at both 1D sequence and 3D structural levels makes this process unnecessarily cumbersome. Results: We introduce a novel pairwise structure alignment tool (rcsb.org/alignment) that seamlessly integrates into the RCSB Protein Data Bank (RCSB PDB) research-focused RCSB.org web portal. Our tool and its underlying application programming interface (alignment.rcsb.org) empowers users to align several protein chains with a reference structure by providing access to established alignment algorithms (FATCAT, CE, TM-align, or Smith–Waterman 3D). The user-friendly interface simplifies parameter setup and input selection. Within seconds, our tool enables visualization of results in both sequence (1D) and structural (3D) perspectives through the RCSB PDB RCSB.org Sequence Annotations viewer and Mol* 3D viewer, respectively. Users can effortlessly compare structures deposited in the PDB archive alongside more than a million incorporated Computed Structure Models coming from the ModelArchive and AlphaFold DB. Moreover, this tool can be used to align custom structure data by providing a link/URL or uploading atomic coordinate files directly. Importantly, alignment results can be bookmarked and shared with collaborators. By bridging the gap between 1D sequence and 3D structures of proteins, our tool facilitates deeper understanding of complex evolutionary relationships among proteins through comprehensive sequence and structural analyses. Availability and implementation: The alignment tool is part of the RCSB PDB research-focused RCSB.org web portal and available at rcsb.org/alignment. Programmatic access is available via alignment.rcsb.org. Frontend code has been published at github.com/rcsb/rcsb-pecos-app. Visualization is powered by the open-source Mol* viewer (github.com/molstar/molstar and github.com/molstar/rcsb-molstar) plus the Sequence Annotations in 3D Viewer (github.com/rcsb/rcsb-saguaro-3d).

We present the results for CAPRI Round 30, the first joint CASP‐CAPRI experiment, which brought together experts from the protein structure prediction and protein–protein docking communities. The Round comprised 25 targets from amongst those submitted for the CASP11 prediction experiment of 2014. The targets included mostly homodimers, a few homotetramers, and two heterodimers, and comprised protein chains that could readily be modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank. On average 24 CAPRI groups and 7 CASP groups submitted docking predictions for each target, and 12 CAPRI groups per target participated in the CAPRI scoring experiment. In total more than 9500 models were assessed against the 3D structures of the corresponding target complexes. Results show that the prediction of homodimer assemblies by homology modeling techniques and docking calculations is quite successful for targets featuring large enough subunit interfaces to represent stable associations. Targets with ambiguous or inaccurate oligomeric state assignments, often featuring crystal contact‐sized interfaces, represented a confounding factor. For those, a much poorer prediction performance was achieved, while nonetheless often providing helpful clues on the correct oligomeric state of the protein. The prediction performance was very poor for genuine tetrameric targets, where the inaccuracy of the homology‐built subunit models and the smaller pair‐wise interfaces severely limited the ability to derive the correct assembly mode. Our analysis also shows that docking procedures tend to perform better than standard homology modeling techniques and that highly accurate models of the protein components are not always required to identify their association modes with acceptable accuracy. Proteins 2016; 84(Suppl 1):323–348. © 2016 The Authors Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Protein–Protein Interactions (PPI) are essentials for most cellular processes and thus, unveiling how proteins interact is a crucial question that can be better understood by identifying which residues are responsible for the interaction. Computational approaches are orders of magnitude cheaper and faster than experimental ones, leading to proliferation of multiple methods aimed to predict which residues belong to the interface of an interaction. We present BIPSPI, a new machine learning-based method for the prediction of partner-specific PPI sites. Contrary to most binding site prediction methods, the proposed approach takes into account a pair of interacting proteins rather than a single one in order to predict partner-specific binding sites. BIPSPI has been trained employing sequence-based and structural features from both protein partners of each complex compiled in the Protein–Protein Docking Benchmark version 5.0 and in an additional set independently compiled. Also, a version trained only on sequences has been developed. The performance of our approach has been assessed by a leave-one-out cross-validation over different benchmarks, outperforming state-of-the-art methods. BIPSPI web server is freely available at http://bipspi.cnb.csic.es. BIPSPI code is available at https://github.com/bioinsilico/BIPSPI. Docker image is available at https://hub.docker.com/r/bioinsilico/bipspi/. Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.