The GEDI LiDAR system was specifically designed to detect vegetation structure and has proven to be a suitable tool for estimating forest biophysical parameters, especially canopy height, at a global scale. This study compares the GEDI relative height metric (RH100) over different forest types, especially deciduous broadleaf and evergreen coniferous located in Thuringia, Germany, to understand how the forest structural differences affect the GEDI height estimation. A canopy height model that was produced using digital terrain and surface models (DTM and DSM) derived from airborne laser scanning data is used as the reference data. Based on the result, GEDI canopy height over needleleaf forest is slightly more accurate (RMSE = 6.61 m) than that over broadleaf (RMSE = 8.30 m) and mixed (RMSE = 7.94 m) forest. Evaluation of the GEDI acquisition parameters shows that differences in beam type, sensitivity, and acquisition time do not significantly affect the accuracy of canopy heights, especially over needleleaf forests. Considering foliage condition impacts on canopy height estimation, the contrasting result is observed in the broadleaf and needleleaf forests. The GEDI dataset acquired during the winter when deciduous species shed their leaves (the so-called leaf-off dataset), outperforms the leaf-on dataset in the broadleaf forest but shows less accurate results for the needleleaf forest. Considering the effect of the plant area index (PAI) on the accuracy of the GEDI canopy height, the GEDI dataset is divided into two sets with low and high PAI values with a threshold of median PAI = 2. The results show that the low PAI dataset (median PAI < 2) corresponds to the non-growing season (autumn and winter) in the broadleaf forest. The slightly better performance of GEDI using the non-growing dataset (RMSE = 7.40 m) compared to the growing dataset (RMSE = 8.44 m) in the deciduous broadleaf forest and vice versa, the slightly better result using the growing dataset (RMSE = 6.38 m) compared to the non-growing dataset (RMSE = 7.24 m) in the evergreen needleleaf forest is in line with the results using the leaf-off/leaf-on season dataset. Although a slight improvement in canopy height estimation was observed using either the leaf-off or non-growing season dataset for broadleaf forest, and either the leaf-on or growing season dataset for needleleaf forest, the approach of filtering GEDI data based on such seasonal acquisition time is recommended when retrieving canopy height over pure stands of broadleaf or needleleaf species, and the sufficient dataset is available.

Exploring vertical forest structures worldwide via remote sensing faces challenges. Recent technologies like waveform LiDAR from NASA’s Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) and SAR Tomography (TomoSAR) from future European Space Agency (ESA) BIOMASS offer promising solutions. This paper assesses the performance of spaceborne GEDI and TomoSAR airborne data from an ESA’s TomoSense campaign to highlight the important role of GEDI measurements in BIOMASS algorithm training and establishing precise site-specific processing parameters. Our study in Germany’s Eifel National Park delves into the precision of GEDI and P-band TomoSAR in measuring surface (Digital Terrain Model - DTM) and vegetation (Canopy Height Model - CHM) heights. Results demonstrate that GEDI and P-band TomoSAR offer high-resolution and precise surface and vegetation heights and vertical profile measurements. While GEDI relative height (RH) at 98% (RH98) was previously recommended for tropical forests, our findings advocate for RH85 as the optimal metric for temperate forests. The research supports improving the accuracy of both DTM and CHM utilizing GEDI beams with full-power lasers coupled with high sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio. Ground elevation measurements are more accurate than canopy height estimates for temperate forests, with DTM RMSE about 2m and CHM RMSE about 3m for GEDI and TomoSAR measurements. By analyzing the vertical structure of monthly GEDI data, we note a 1-meter shift in the volume peak between GEDI’s leaf-on and leaf-off periods. At the same time, TomoSAR consistently exhibits a lower volume peak by about 2 meters compared to GEDI during leaf-on seasons. In conclusion, our research underscores the complementary roles of TomoSAR and GEDI in accurately mapping diverse forest types, thereby bolstering the effectiveness of the BIOMASS mission.