Upper extremity function has a strong impact on the quality of life in cervical spinal cord–injured patients. Upper extremity function depends on many factors, such as muscle strength, level of lesion, and extension of the cord damage in its axial axis produced by the injury. These variables can be obtained by the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, which is the standard for the functional evaluation of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between upper limb muscle strength, level of injury, and axial damage with the functionality of upper limb measured using the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT) and the 9 Hole Peg Test (9HPT) in cervical SCI. Twenty-nine patients were included in this study. Our results suggest that both the JTHFT and 9HPT can be similarly used to quantify functional impairment after cervical SCI. Moreover, our data suggest that the upper extremity motor score, JTHFT, and 9HPT strongly correlate with the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale (graded from A to E), but not with the lesion level. Our findings can be of great importance for the clinician or researchers whose therapeutic interventions have as a main objective to improve upper limb functionality in patients with cervical SCI. We suggest that ASIA impairment scale, ASIA motor score, and functional tests (including JTHFT and/or 9HPT) could be used as outcome measures in cervical SCI clinical trials.

The upper extremity behavior in smoothness and efficiency metrics should be different between paraplegic and tetraplegic patients. The aim of this article was to analyze the behavior of these metrics after receiving upper extremity training with the humanoid robot Robic as a treatment. Ten pediatric patients participated in the study and completed ten experimental sessions with Robic. Patients were assessed at baseline and at ending the training using the Box and Block test and a non-immersive virtual application based on the Leap Motion Controller available in the RehabHand software. From this application, the smoothness metric was calculated as the number of peaks or units of movement detected in the velocity profile of the hand during the execution of the task, and the efficiency metric was assessed by calculating the length of the hand trajectory. Patients with tetraplegia had a significantly longer trajectory (286.01 ± 59.87 mm) than paraplegics (123.61 ± 17.14 mm) in the baseline situation. However, at the end of the training, there were no differences between them. In the Box and Block test, the paraplegic group passed more cubes than tetraplegics. In conclusion, the first experience with a Robic robot in SCI was very positive, with observed improvements in upper extremity dexterity in trained patients.

This study aimed: (1) to evaluate the hand motor fatigability in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) and compare it with measurements obtained form an able-bodied population; (2) to compare the hand motor fatigability in people with tetraplegia and in people with paraplegia; and (3) to analyse if motor fatigability is different in people with SCI with and without clinical significant perceived fatigability. Materials and Methods: 96 participants with SCI (40 cervical and 56 thoracolumbar) and 63 able-bodied controls performed a simple hand isometric task to assess motor fatigability. The Fatigue Severity Scale was used for perceived fatigability evaluation. Results: The main results of this study can be summarized as follows: (1) the waning in muscle force (motor fatigability) during a fatiguing task is similar in controls and participants with SCI; (2) the motor fatigability is influenced by the maximal muscle force (measured at the beginning of the task); and (3) the perceived fatigability and the motor fatigability are largely independent in the individuals with SCI. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the capability to maintain a prolonged effort is preserved in SCI, and this capacity depends on the residual maximal muscle force in people with SCI.

Background. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) has an analgesic effect superior to a placebo in chronic pain. Some years ago, tDCS was implemented at the Hospital Nacional of Paraplegics (Toledo, Spain) to treat patients with pharmacological resistance to chronic pain. Objective. The main objectives of this study with tDCS were (1) to confirm the safety of one-year treatment; (2) to estimate the number of patients after one year in treatment; (3) to describe the effects of tDCS on the pain intensity during one-year treatment; and (4) to identify factors related to treatment success. Methods. This was a retrospective study conducted at the National Hospital for Paraplegics with 155 patients with pharmacologically resistant chronic pain. Anodal tDCS was applied over the M1 for 20 min at 1.5 mA for 10 treatment sessions from Monday to Friday (Induction phase), followed by 2–3 sessions per month (Maintenance phase). Pain intensity was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Results. Anodal tDCS on M1 confirmed the reduction in the pain intensity. Moreover, 58% of outpatients completed one year of treatment. Only the VAS values obtained during the baseline influenced the response to treatment. Patients with a very high VAS at the baseline were more likely to not respond adequately to tDCS treatment. Conclusions. Anodal tDCS over M1 is an adequate therapy (safe and efficient) to treat drug-resistant chronic pain. Moreover, pain intensity at the start of treatment could be a predictor of patients’ continuity with tDCS for at least one year.

(1) Background: The influence of robotic therapy on patients with sub-acute cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) for improving their activities of daily living (ADL) performance is unclear; (2) Methods: 31 subjects with cervical SCI completed the training randomly assigned to an intervention or control group during 40 sessions. All the subjects received, in each session, 30 min of upper-extremity conventional therapy. In addition, the subjects within the control group received another 30 min of conventional therapy, whereas subjects within the intervention group received 30 min of robotic therapy with Armeo Spring (Hocoma AG, Volketswil, Switzerland). Therefore, the ADL of drinking was trained by using the exoskeleton. Feasibility and efficacy measurements as clinical scales and kinematic indices, and usability questionnaires, were used as assessment at baseline and at the ending of the study (week 10); (3) Results: The intervention group significantly improved with regards to the feeding and grooming items of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure scale. The improvement in the movement smoothness related to the activity of drinking was greater in the intervention group than in the control (p = 0.034); (4) Conclusions: The findings of this study reveal that patients with cervical SCI improve their performance in ADL with robotic therapy.