The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of increasing levels of prepartum and postpartum protein supplementation on nutrient intake and digestibility, productive performance and metabolic status of beef heifers on tropical pasture. Twenty-eight pregnant beef heifers with bodyweight and body condition score of 459.7 ± 6.8 kg and 5.8 ± 0.10 respectively, were used. The experiment was performed according to a completely randomised design, with the following four treatments: 0.0, 0.4, 0.8 and 1.2 kg/animal.day of protein supplement containing 25% crude protein. All animals received a mineral mixture ad libitum. The experiment lasted 210 days, divided into three experimental periods. The supplementation level increased the intake of all evaluated nutrients, digestibility of organic matter, neutral detergent fibre corrected for ash and protein, as well as higher average daily gain prepartum and bodyweight of calves at birth (P < 0.05). Protein supplement at the levels evaluated did not affect body condition score (P > 0.05). An interaction effect between treatment × days in relation to calving occurred for concentrations of serum urea nitrogen, total proteins, albumin and globulins (P < 0.05). Supplementation did not affect glucose, triglyceride, non-esterified fatty acids, ß-hydroxybutyrate or progesterone (P > 0.05). In conclusion, supply of up to 1.2 kg/day of protein supplement for grazing beef heifers optimises forage intake and average daily gain before calving, and improves the indicators of the protein status.

The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of energy-protein supplementation in preand postpartum periods on the productive and metabolic responses of grazing beef cows on tropical pasture. A group of 48 multiparous Nellore cows, with an initial gestation period of 6.4 months, body weight (BW) of 514.9 kg, and body condition score (BCS) of 5.4, was distributed in a completely randomized design, in a 2×2 factorial arrangement. The evaluated treatments were: UNS-UNS, unsupplemented during prepartum and postpartum; UNS-SUP, unsupplemented during prepartum and supplemented during postpartum; SUP-UNS, supplemented during prepartum and unsupplemented during postpartum; and SUP-SUP, supplemented during preand postpartum. The energy-protein supplement was offered at an amount of 1.5 kg per animal per day. Prepartum supplementation increased average daily gain and BCS at calving. Prepartum supplementation reduced non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) and increased serum concentrations of total proteins and globulins during postpartum. Postpartum supplementation increased the BCS of cows and BW of calves at the end of the experiment. Postpartum supplementation increased blood concentrations of progesterone, while NEFA decreased. Supplementation with 1.5 kg per day of the energy-protein supplement during the last 84 days of gestation improves productive performance and metabolic status during the preand postpartum periods of grazing cows.

Our objective was to evaluate the effects of protein supplementation frequency and supplementation plans during gestation on productive performance and metabolic responses of grazing super-precocious Nellore heifers. Thirty-five pregnant Nellore heifers were used in a completely randomized design in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement with an additional control group. The factors were the following: 1. Frequency of supplementation: (a) Daily (seven times per week), (b) Infrequent (three times per week); 2. Supplementation plans: (a) Constant, (b) Increasing. A control group with no supplementation was included. Two digestibility trials were carried out on the 40th and 130th experimental days. Productive performance and body composition were evaluated in the prepartum and postpartum periods. Blood samples were collected at −114, −113, −15, −14, +15, +30, and +45 days relative to calving for measuring metabolic status. Supplementation (daily and infrequent) increased the intake of total dry matter (DM) (p ≤ 0.004), average daily gain (p < 0.001), and body weight at calving (p = 0.008) at prepartum. However, frequency or supplementation plan did not alter (p > 0.17) the intake of total DM and forage DM. There was an effect (p ≤ 0.02) of the supplementation plan on subcutaneous thickness fat in the prepartum period and albumin and non-esterified fatty acid concentrations (p < 0.004) in the postpartum period. Nonetheless, frequency and supplementation plans did not affect (p ≥ 0.10) heifers’ productive performance during the postpartum period. In conclusion, protein supplementation frequency and supplementation plan during beef heifers’ gestation do not negatively impact their productive performance or metabolic responses.

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the provision of a protein-rich supplement on productive performance, and metabolic profile on grazing suckling female beef calves in tropical conditions during 150 d of experimentation.Methods: Fifty-six Nellore suckling female calves, and their respective dams were distributed in a completely randomised design and made to undergo two treatments as follows: UNS (without supplementation), and SUP (supplementation with 5 g/kg body weight [BW] of a protein supplement). Throughout the experiment, animal performance and metabolic profile were evaluated. Also, ureagenesis and gluconeogenesis were assessed for gene expression.Results: SUP female calves showed a higher voluntary intake (p≤0.03) of the diet components evaluated, digestibility of organic matter (p≤0.02) and microbial nitrogen production (MICN; p≤0.02) compared to UNS female calves. In its turn, serum urea nitrogen (p≤0.01) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (p≤0.03) levels and ureagenesis (p≤0.04) increased in SUP female calves compared to UNS female calves. Blood glucose and triglyceride levels were not affected by supplementation. The average daily gain (ADG) from SUP female calves was higher (p≤0.02) compared with UNS female calves. However, supplementation did not affect the body measures of the animals.Conclusion: In summary, provision of a protein-rich supplement improves the intake and nutrients digestibility, ADG and final BW and increases metabolic indicators of the protein status in grazing suckling female beef calves in tropical conditions.

The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of dietary supplementation with a protein-energy concentrate during the pre-weaning period on the nutritional and productive performance and on the metabolic response of crossbred female calves fed medium-quality forage in a dual-purpose system. Twelve Gyr×Holstein suckling female calves, with a body weight of 123.0±0.23 kg and an initial average age of 5.7±0.38 months, were distributed in a completely randomized design. Two treatments were carried out: animals without supplementation (control); and animals supplemented with 5.0 g kg^-1 body weight of a protein-energy concentrate, containing 23.01% crude protein and 78% total digestible nutrients. Supplementation increased the intake of crude protein, nonfibrous carbohydrates, and neutral detergent fiber, but had no effect on dry matter intake. There was also an increase in the blood concentration of serum urea nitrogen. In addition, supplementation decreased forage intake time and increased idle time. The final body weight of the supplemented female calves was the heaviest, but did not influence the body measurements of the animals. Supplementation with 5.0 g kg^-1 body weight of a protein-energy concentrate during the pre-weaning period improves the productive performance of crossbred female calves.

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prepartum supplementation levels on the productive and nutritional performance and metabolic responses of Nellore cows in a grazing system. Forty-four pregnant Nellore cows multiparous with an initial mean gestation time of 230 days, average initial body weight (BW) of 541 ± 19 kg, and body condition score (BCS) of 5.5 ± 1.7 were used and distributed in a completely randomized design, with four treatments and 11 cows per treatment. The treatments evaluated consisted of four supplementation levels in the prepartum period with a duration of 60 days, according to the following scheme: 0.0 (Control = CON); 0.5 (LOW); 1.0 (Medium = MED) and; 1.5 (High = HIG) kg per animal day-1 of supplement. The supplement was composed of wheat meal and urea, and formulated to contain 22% of crude protein (CP). A positive linear effect (P < 0.05) was observed on the intake of CP and CP:digested organic matter (DOM) ratio as supplementation levels were increased. In addition, a quadratic effect (P < 0.05) was detected on the intake of neutral detergent fiber corrected for ash and protein (apNDF), digested neutral detergent fiber, and DOM with increasing supplementation levels in the prepartum period, in which MED cows had higher intakes compared to CON, LOW, and HIG cows. Prepartum supplementation levels did not affect (P > 0.10) the average daily gain in the prepartum or postpartum periods and, BCS of the dams, and BW of calves at birth or 45 days of age. In the prepartum period, supplementation levels did not affect (P > 0.10) the blood concentrations of total proteins, albumin, globulins, glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, non-esterified fatty acids, and beta-hydroxybutyrate in the experimental cows. In conclusion, the provision of 1.0 kg of supplement per animal per day during the last 60 days of pregnancy improves prepartum nutritional performance and postpartum milk production of grazing beef cows.