Alexey Sizikov

Dr. Alexey Sizikov

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMark Markovich Melamud
Mark Markovich Melamud
Evgeny ErmakovEvgeny Ermakov
Evgeny Ermakov
ABAnastasiia Sergeevna Boiko
Anastasiia Sergeevna Boiko
DKDaria A. Kamaeva
Daria A. Kamaeva
ASAlexey Sizikov
Alexey Sizikov
VBValentina Buneva
Valentina Buneva
Changes in cytokine profiles and cytokine networks are known to be a hallmark of autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and multiple sclerosis (MS). However, cytokine profiles research studies are usually based on the analysis of a small number of cytokines and give conflicting results. In this work, we analyzed cytokine profiles of 41 analytes in patients with SLE and MS compared with healthy donors using multiplex immunoassay. The SLE group included treated patients, while the MS patients were drug-free. Levels of 11 cytokines, IL-1b, IL-1RA, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-15, MCP-1/CCL2, Fractalkine/CX3CL1, MIP-1a/CCL3, MIP-1b/CCL4, and TNFa, were increased, but sCD40L, PDGF-AA, and MDC/CCL22 levels were decreased in SLE patients. Thus, changes in the cytokine profile in SLE have been associated with the dysregulation of interleukins, TNF superfamily members, and chemokines. In the case of MS, levels of 10 cytokines, sCD40L, CCL2, CCL3, CCL22, PDGF-AA, PDGF-AB/BB, EGF, IL-8, TGF-a, and VEGF, decreased significantly compared to the control group. Therefore, cytokine network dysregulation in MS is characterized by abnormal levels of growth factors and chemokines. Cross-disorder analysis of cytokine levels in MS and SLE showed significant differences between 22 cytokines. Protein interaction network analysis showed that all significantly altered cytokines in both SLE and MS are functionally interconnected. Thus, MS and SLE may be associated with impaired functional relationships in the cytokine network. A cytokine correlation networks analysis revealed changes in correlation clusters in SLE and MS. These data expand the understanding of abnormal regulatory interactions in cytokine profiles associated with autoimmune diseases.

1 July 2022 in Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders - Drug Targets
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMark Markovich Melamud
Mark Markovich Melamud
Evgeny ErmakovEvgeny Ermakov
Evgeny Ermakov
ABAnastasiia Sergeevna Boiko
Anastasiia Sergeevna Boiko
DKDaria A. Kamaeva
Daria A. Kamaeva
ASAlexey Sizikov
Alexey Sizikov
VBValentina Buneva
Valentina Buneva
Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is known to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). SLE patients suffer from CVD 3.5 times more often than healthy people. Cytokine-mediated inflammation is actively involved in the development of cardiovascular pathology. Objective: Here, we analyzed serum levels of nine cytokines of steroids-treated SLE patients depending on the presence of concomitant CVD. Methods: The levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-21, tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), B-cell activating factor (BAFF), and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) were analyzed using multiplex immunoassay. Results: In the total group of SLE patients (n=29), the concentrations of IL-6 and IL-10 were higher, and the APRIL level decreased compared to healthy donors (n=39, p<0.05). The same changes were observed in the group of patients without CVD (n=15); the levels of IL-6 and IL-10 were found to be increased, and the level of APRIL was lower than in healthy individuals (p<0.05). In the group of SLE patients with CVD (n=14), the concentrations of IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and TNFα were found to be increased (p<0.05). Interestingly, the levels of TNFα and BAFF in SLE patients with CVD were higher than in patients without cardiovascular pathology. Thus, TNFα and BAFF levels were significantly altered in SLE with concomitant CVD compared to SLE without CVD. Conclusion: These findings suggest that cytokine profiles in SLE with concomitant CVD and SLE without CVD are different, which should be considered in further research with large samples.

17 June 2022 in Terapevticheskii arkhiv
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMaksim Korolev
Maksim Korolev
ELElena A. Letyagina
Elena A. Letyagina
ASAlexey Sizikov
Alexey Sizikov
LBLarisa A. Bogoderova
Larisa A. Bogoderova
YUYuliya B. Ubshaeva
Yuliya B. Ubshaeva
YKYuliya Kurochkina
Yuliya Kurochkina
Background. Currently, observations are accumulating indicating the negative effect of therapy with a number of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) drugs on the course of COVID-19. These facts determine the relevance of studying the factors of severe course and unfavorable outcome in immuno-inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IIRD) patients treated with bDMARDs in order to develop tactics for managing this category of patients in a pandemic. Aim. To evaluate the influence of clinical and demographic factors on the risk of development, severity of the course and clinical outcomes of a new coronavirus infection in patients suffering from IIRD and receiving therapy with genetically engineered biological drugs. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of the database of the register of patients with IIRD receiving bDMARDs in the Novosibirsk region was performed, which included 318 patients, 94 of whom had indications of having suffered viral infection/pneumonia for the period from 01.04.2020 to 31.12.2020. Results. According to the data obtained, at the time of the analysis, 94 people out of 318 patients with IIRD had a new coronavirus infection. Most (53%) of the patients had a mild infection. At the same time, the nosological form, the use of anti-rheumatic drugs and glucocorticoids did not increase the risks of severe coronavirus infection. When using bDMARDs, only anti-B-cell therapy (rituximab) associated with statistically significant increase in the risk of severe/extremely severe COVID-19. The mortality rate according to the analysis of the register was 6,38%. Conclusion. Patients with IIRD have a high risk of severe coronavirus infection, while the severity of the disease is associated with the type of therapy performed.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMark Markovich Melamud
Mark Markovich Melamud
ATAnna Tolmacheva
Anna Tolmacheva
ASAlexey Sizikov
Alexey Sizikov
NKNataliya Klyaus
Nataliya Klyaus
EZEvgenii Sergeevich Zhuravlev
Evgenii Sergeevich Zhuravlev
Evgeny ErmakovEvgeny Ermakov
Evgeny Ermakov
NETosis is assumed to be involved in the pathogenesis of common rheumatic diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, the levels of circulating NETosis biomarkers and the extent of changes in these markers in specific rheumatic diseases are not fully understood. In this study, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration as a non-specific marker, as well as myeloperoxidase (MPO) and citrullinated histone H3 (H3cit) as specific markers of NETosis, were investigated in SLE, RA, PsA, and AS. Analysis of covariance, accounting for sex, age and disease duration, showed that total cfDNA was elevated in SLE and AS compared with healthy subjects. Nuclear and mitochondrial cfDNA were elevated in four diseases. However, nuclear cfDNA was increased to a greater extent in SLE but mitochondrial cfDNA was higher in RA. MPO and H3cit were significantly elevated in SLE compared with other diseases, although MPO was also higher in RA. Elevated concentrations of MPO and H3cit in SLE were associated with the presence of concomitant cardiovascular diseases. The effect of biological therapy on mitochondrial cfDNA, MPO, and H3cit was also shown. The proinflammatory cytokine IL-18, implicated in the induction of NETosis, was similarly elevated in the four rheumatic diseases. Thus, the most striking signs of NETosis are found in SLE, although they are also present in RA. PsA and AS were mainly characterized by an increase in cfDNA. These data highlight characteristic changes in NETosis markers in four rheumatic diseases.

5 January 2025 in The Egyptian Rheumatologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Evgeny ErmakovEvgeny Ermakov
Evgeny Ermakov
ATAnna Tolmacheva
Anna Tolmacheva
VKVadim V. Kon’kOv
Vadim V. Kon’kOv
MMMark M. Melamud
Mark M. Melamud
ASAlexey Sizikov
Alexey Sizikov
VBValentina N. Buneva
Valentina N. Buneva

31 December 2023 in Rheumatology Science and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SESh. Erdes
Sh. Erdes
VMV. I. Mazurov
V. I. Mazurov
IGI. Z. Gaydukova
I. Z. Gaydukova
OAO. N. Anoshenkova
O. N. Anoshenkova
IVI. B. Vinogradova
I. B. Vinogradova
СДС. Ю. Давидьян
С. Ю. Давидьян
Background. Netakimab has shown high efficacy in controlled clinical trials in the treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). This article presents results of an observational study of netakimab using in routine clinical practice.Methods. Patients were recruited for the study from August 2020 to December 2021 at 23 centers in the Russian Federation. The study included patients who were prescribed netakimab therapy before enrollment, so clinical and medical history data for the first visit were entered retrospectively, and following visits at weeks 12, 24 and 52 of therapy were collected within the study. Drug survival rate has been calculated according to Kaplan – Meier analysis.Results. The study included 137 patients (93 men and 14 women) with AS. The average age of patients was 42.3 (±11.9) years, 34.3% of patients had previously received therapy with genetically engineered biologic drugs, mainly tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. At the end of the analyzed period (52 weeks of therapy), 90.4% [95% CI: 85.4–95.7] of patients continued treatment with netakimab. The BASDAI and ASDAS-CRP showed statistically significant decreases in scores from baseline at all time points. Netakimab was well tolerated by patients; adverse effects (AEs), related to therapy according to the investigator’s opinion, were reported in 7 (5.1%) patients. 2 patients stopped taking netakimab due to AEs: terminal ileitis and chronic colitis.Conclusions. In real-world clinical practice, netakimab demonstrated high retention rates, a favorable safety profile, and sustained efficacy throughout the first year of therapy.